IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1787-d1236396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Machinery Socialization Service Adoption, Risks, and Relative Poverty of Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Hailan Qiu

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330044, China)

  • Mingrui Feng

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330044, China)

  • Yiming Chi

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330044, China)

  • Mingzhong Luo

    (College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Agricultural machinery socialization services are an important means of alleviating poverty and promoting agricultural modernization. Based on 2750 items of survey data from farmers in Henan Province, this paper empirically tests the impact and mechanism of agricultural machinery socialization service adoption on the relative poverty of farmers by using a binary logit model and mediation effect model. The results show that the adoption of agricultural machinery socialization services has a significant negative impact on the relative poverty of farmers. The reduction in natural risk plays an intermediary role in the impact of the adoption of agricultural machinery socialization services on the relative poverty of farmers. The size of the household labor force and the land operation scale affect the poverty reduction effect of agricultural machinery socialization services. It can be seen that in the relative poverty governance stage, we should improve the development of the agricultural machinery socialization service system, enhance the risk resistance of farmers, build a supporting system for farmers’ employment skills training, and encourage an orderly connection between the large-scale operation of agricultural land and the large-scale operation of services so as to fully realize the poverty reduction role of agricultural machinery socialization services.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailan Qiu & Mingrui Feng & Yiming Chi & Mingzhong Luo, 2023. "Agricultural Machinery Socialization Service Adoption, Risks, and Relative Poverty of Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1787-:d:1236396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1787/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1787/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan, Guanghua & Hu, Xiaoshan & Liu, Weiqun, 2021. "China's poverty reduction miracle and relative poverty: Focusing on the roles of growth and inequality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Reddy, Amarender A. & Rani, Radhika Ch. & Reddy, G.P., 2014. "Labor Scarcity and Farm Mechanisation: A Cross State Comparison," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 69(3), pages 1-12.
    4. Stéphane Hallegatte & Adrien Vogt-Schilb & Julie Rozenberg & Mook Bangalore & Chloé Beaudet, 2020. "From Poverty to Disaster and Back: a Review of the Literature," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 223-247, April.
    5. Binswanger, Hans, 1986. "Agricultural Mechanization: A Comparative Historical Perspective," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 1(1), pages 27-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruisheng Li & Jiaoyan Chen & Dingde Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Socialized Service on Grain Production: Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Yi Liu & Hanyue Wang & Chongxu Liu & Mengding Li & Dingde Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Outsourcing Service Adoption on Pesticide Application Reduction from the Perspective of the Principal–Agent Theory: An Empirical Study from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Heng Zhang & Xiuguang Bai & Mao Zhao, 2024. "How Socialized Services Affect Agricultural Economic Resilience—Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunhui Wang & Yihua Chen & Zhiying Li, 2024. "Escaping poverty: changing characteristics of China’s rural poverty reduction policy and future trends," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Valda Rondelli & Enrico Capacci & Bruno Franceschetti, 2022. "Evaluation of the Stability Behavior of an Agricultural Unmanned Ground Vehicle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Hiroyuki Takeshima & Rajendra Prasad Adhikari & Anjani Kumar, 2016. "Is Access to Tractor Service a Binding Constraint for Nepali Terai Farmers?," Working Papers id:9604, eSocialSciences.
    4. Susana Ferreira, 2024. "Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation Policies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 207-231, October.
    5. Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & Salhab,Melda, 2020. "People in Harm's Way : Flood Exposure and Poverty in 189 Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9447, The World Bank.
    6. Yidi Liu & Xin Li & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng, 2024. "Consequences of China’s 2018 Online Lending Regulation and the Promise of PolicyTech," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1235-1256, September.
    7. Songmao Wang & Yingzhi Guo & Zhaoli He, 2023. "Analysis on the Measurement and Dynamic Evolution of Multidimensional Return to Poverty in Chinese Rural Households," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 31-52, January.
    8. Hiroyuki Takeshima & Yanyan Liu & Ian Masias, 2018. "Evolution of Agricultural Mechanization in Vietnam: Insights from a Literature Review and Multiple Rounds of a Farm Household Survey," Working Papers id:12785, eSocialSciences.
    9. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Berhane, Guush & Dereje, Mekdim & Minten, Bart & Tamru, Seneshaw, 2020. "The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 10, pages 329-375, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Jiquan Peng & Zihao Zhao & Lili Chen, 2022. "The Impact of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Rural Poverty in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Ager, Philipp & Goñi, Marc & Salvanes, Kjell Gunnar, 2023. "Gender-biased technological change: Milking machines and the exodus of women from farming," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 16/2023, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    13. Michael A. Clemens & Ethan G. Lewis & Hannah M. Postel, 2018. "Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1468-1487, June.
    14. Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2015. "Identifying the effects of market imperfections for a scale biased agricultural technology: Tractors in Nigeria," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211937, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Qun Wang & Lu Shu & Xiaojun Lu, 2023. "Dynamics of multidimensional poverty and its determinants among the middle-aged and older adults in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Idelphonse O. Saliou & Afio Zannou & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Albert N. Honlonkou, 2020. "Drivers of Mechanization in Cotton Production in Benin, West Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Gandidzanwa, Colleta & Liebenberg, Frikkie, 2016. "Towards a New Capital Formation Series for Machinery in South African Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 55(3), September.
    18. Xia, Fangzhou & Huang, Jing & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2024. "Government concerns, the benefit cliff, and land use: A comparative study of rural impoverished and marginalised impoverished groups," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    19. Yukichi Y. & Mano Yukichi Y. & Takahashi Kazushi & Otsuka Keijiro, 2017. "Contract Farming, Farm Mechanization, and Agricultural Intensification: The Case of Rice Farming in Cote d’Ivoire," Working Papers 157, JICA Research Institute.
    20. Karagiannis, Giannis, 1999. "Proportional Profit Taxes And Resource Management Under Production Uncertainty," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1787-:d:1236396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.