IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i7p1363-d1189803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology of Automatic Evaluation of Dairy Herd Fatness

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey S. Yurochka

    (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1st Institutsky Proezd 5, 109428 Moscow, Russia)

  • Igor M. Dovlatov

    (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1st Institutsky Proezd 5, 109428 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitriy Y. Pavkin

    (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1st Institutsky Proezd 5, 109428 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladimir A. Panchenko

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian University of Transport, 127994 Moscow, Russia)

  • Aleksandr A. Smirnov

    (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1st Institutsky Proezd 5, 109428 Moscow, Russia)

  • Yuri A. Proshkin

    (Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution, Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1st Institutsky Proezd 5, 109428 Moscow, Russia)

  • Igor Yudaev

    (Energy Department, Kuban State Agrarian University, 350044 Krasnodar, Russia)

Abstract

The global recent development trend in dairy farming emphasizes the automation and robotization of milk production. The rapid development rate of dairy farming requires new technologies to increase the economic efficiency and improve production. The research goal was to increase the milk production efficiency by introducing the technology to automatically assess the fatness of a dairy herd in 0.25-point step on a 5-point scale. Experimental data were collected on the 3D ToF camera O3D 303 installed in a walk-through machine on robotic free-stall farms in the period from August 2020 to November 2022. The authors collected data on 182 animals and processed 546 images. All animals were between 450 and 700 kg in weight. Based on the regression analysis, they developed software to find and identify the main five regions of interest: the spinous processes of the lumbar spine and back; the transverse processes of the lumbar spine and the gluteal fossa area; the malar and sciatic tuberosities; the tail base; and the vulva and anus region. The adequacy of the proposed technology was verified by means of a parallel expert survey. The developed technology was tested on 3 farms with a total of 1810 cows and is helpful for the non-contact evaluation of the fatness of a dairy herd within the herd’s life cycle. The developed method can be used to evaluate the tail base area with 100% accuracy. The hungry hole can be determined with a 98.9% probability; the vulva and anus area—with a 95.10% probability. Protruding vertebrae—namely, spinous processes and transverse processes—were evaluated with a 52.20% and 51.10% probability. The system’s overall accuracy was assessed as 93.4%, which was a positive result. Animals in the condition of 2.5 to 3.5 at 5–6 months were considered healthy. The developed system makes it possible to divide the animals into three groups, confirming their physiological status: normal range body condition, exhaustion, and obesity. By means of a correlation dependence equal to R = 0.849 (Pearson method), the authors revealed that animals of the same breed and in the same lactation range have a linear dependence of weight-to-fatness score. They have developed an algorithm for automated assessment of the fatness of animals with further staging of their physiological state. The economic effect of implementing the proposed system has been demonstrated. The effect of increasing the production efficiency of a dairy farm by introducing the technology of automatic evaluation of the fatness of a dairy herd with a 0.25-point step on a 5-point scale had been achieved. The overall accuracy of the system was estimated at 93.4%.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey S. Yurochka & Igor M. Dovlatov & Dmitriy Y. Pavkin & Vladimir A. Panchenko & Aleksandr A. Smirnov & Yuri A. Proshkin & Igor Yudaev, 2023. "Technology of Automatic Evaluation of Dairy Herd Fatness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1363-:d:1189803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walenty Poczta & Joanna Średzińska & Maciej Chenczke, 2020. "Economic Situation of Dairy Farms in Identified Clusters of European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Habtamu Alem, 2021. "The Role of Technical Efficiency Achieving Sustainable Development: A Dynamic Analysis of Norwegian Dairy Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jibo Yue & Chengquan Zhou & Haikuan Feng & Yanjun Yang & Ning Zhang, 2023. "Novel Applications of Optical Sensors and Machine Learning in Agricultural Monitoring," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-4, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lukáš Čechura & Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Irena Benešová, 2021. "Productivity and Efficiency in European Milk Production: Can We Observe the Effects of Abolishing Milk Quotas?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Kingdom Simfukwe & Moses Majid Limuwa & Friday Njaya, 2022. "Are Chilimira Fishers of Engraulicypris sardella ( Günther , 1868) in Lake Malawi Productive? The Case of Nkhotakota District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Diro, Samuel & Mohammed, Ali & Getahun, Wudineh & Mamo, Tadele, 2024. "Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Wheat Farmers in Ethiopia: A Panel Data Approach," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344277, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    4. Diana Elena Micle & Florina Deiac & Alexandru Olar & Raul Florentin Drența & Cristian Florean & Ionuț Grigore Coman & Felix Horațiu Arion, 2021. "Research on Innovative Business Plan. Smart Cattle Farming Using Artificial Intelligent Robotic Process Automation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Nguyen-Anh, Tuan & Hoang-Duc, Chinh & Tiet, Tuyen & Nguyen-Van, Phu & To-The, Nguyen, 2022. "Composite effects of human, natural and social capitals on sustainable food-crop farming in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Andrzej Parzonko & Anna Justyna Parzonko & Piotr Bórawski & Ludwik Wicki, 2023. "Return on Equity in Dairy Farms from Selected EU Countries: Assessment Based on the DuPont Model in Years 2004–2020," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Zdeňka Náglová & Tamara Rudinskaya, 2021. "Factors Influencing Technical Efficiency in the EU Dairy Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Kołoszycz, Ewa, 2020. "Economic Viability Of Dairy Farms In Selected European Union Countries," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    9. Bożena Kusz & Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Maciej Oesterreich & Ludwik Wicki & Grzegorz Zimon, 2022. "Selected Economic Determinants of Labor Profitability in Family Farms in Poland in Relation to Economic Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Piotr Borawski & Beata Kalinowska & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Andrzej Parzonko & Bogdan Klepacki & James Willam Dunn, 2021. "Changes in the Milk Market in the United States on the Background of the European Union and the World," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1010-1033.
    11. Asif Rasool & David Abler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in US Farms: A New Clustering by Production Potentials," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Georgia Koutouzidou & Athanasios Ragkos & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Evolution of the Structure and Economic Management of the Dairy Cow Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Roel Jongeneel & Ana Gonzalez-Martinez, 2022. "EU Dairy after the Quota Abolition: Inelastic Asymmetric Price Responsiveness and Adverse Milk Supply during Crisis Time," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Maria Zuba-Ciszewska & Aleksandra Kowalska & Aneta Brodziak & Louise Manning, 2023. "Organic Milk Production Sector in Poland: Driving the Potential to Meet Future Market, Societal and Environmental Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Habtamu Alem, 2023. "The role of green total factor productivity to farm-level performance: evidence from Norwegian dairy farms," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Susanna Lahnamäki-Kivelä & Tuomas Kuhmonen, 2022. "How Farmers Conceive and Cope with Megatrends: The Case of Finnish Dairy Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Karolina Pawlak & Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, 2020. "The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Jongeneel, Roel & Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana Rosa, 2022. "The role of market drivers in explaining the EU milk supply after the milk quota abolition," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 194-209.
    19. Xabier Díaz de Otálora & Agustín del Prado & Federico Dragoni & Fernando Estellés & Barbara Amon, 2021. "Evaluating Three-Pillar Sustainability Modelling Approaches for Dairy Cattle Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1363-:d:1189803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.