IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1330-d900239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Models for Utilization in Genomic Prediction of Agronomic Traits in the Louisiana Sugarcane Breeding Program

Author

Listed:
  • Subhrajit Satpathy

    (School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
    Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Dipendra Shahi

    (School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA)

  • Brayden Blanchard

    (Sugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA 70776, USA)

  • Michael Pontif

    (Sugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA 70776, USA)

  • Kenneth Gravois

    (Sugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA 70776, USA)

  • Collins Kimbeng

    (Sugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA 70776, USA)

  • Anna Hale

    (Sugar Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA 70360, USA)

  • James Todd

    (Sugar Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA 70360, USA)

  • Atmakuri Rao

    (Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Niranjan Baisakh

    (School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA)

Abstract

Sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) is an important perennial grass crop for both sugar and biofuel industries. The Louisiana sugarcane breeding program is focused on improving sugar yield by incrementally increasing genetic gain. With the advancement in genotyping and (highthroughput) phenotyping techniques, genomic selection is a promising marker-assisted breeding tool. In this study, we assessed ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP) and various Bayesian models to evaluate genomic prediction accuracy using a 10-fold cross validation on 95 commercial and elite parental clones from the Louisiana sugarcane breeding program. Datasets (individual and pooled in various combinations) were constructed based on soil type (light—Commerce silty loam, heavy—Sharkey clay) and crop (plant cane, ratoon). A total of 3906 SNPs were used to predict the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of the clones for sucrose content and cane and sugar yield. Prediction accuracy was estimated by both Spearman’s rank correlation and Pearson’s correlation between phenotypic breeding values and GEBVs. All traits showed significant variation with moderate (42% for sucrose content) to high (85% for cane and sugar yield) heritability. Prediction accuracy based on rank correlation was high (0.47–0.80 for sucrose content; 0.61–0.69 for cane yield, and 0.56–0.72 for sugar yield) in all cross-effect prediction models where soil and crop types were considered as fixed effects. In general, Bayesian models demonstrated a higher correlation than rrBLUP. The Pearson’s correlation without soil and crop type as fixed effects was lower with no clear pattern among the models. The results demonstrate the potential implementation of genomic prediction in the Louisiana sugarcane variety development program.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhrajit Satpathy & Dipendra Shahi & Brayden Blanchard & Michael Pontif & Kenneth Gravois & Collins Kimbeng & Anna Hale & James Todd & Atmakuri Rao & Niranjan Baisakh, 2022. "Evaluation of Models for Utilization in Genomic Prediction of Agronomic Traits in the Louisiana Sugarcane Breeding Program," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1330-:d:900239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    2. Goldemberg, José & Coelho, Suani Teixeira & Guardabassi, Patricia, 2008. "The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 2086-2097, June.
    3. Jian Zeng & Dorian Garrick & Jack Dekkers & Rohan Fernando, 2018. "A nested mixture model for genomic prediction using whole-genome SNP genotypes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Anne Musson & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the effect of crisis on cooperatives: a Bayesian performance analysis of French craftsmen cooperatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(25), pages 2657-2678, May.
    3. Prüser, Jan, 2017. "Forecasting US inflation using Markov dimension switching," Ruhr Economic Papers 710, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Armagan, Artin & Dunson, David, 2011. "Sparse variational analysis of linear mixed models for large data sets," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(8), pages 1056-1062, August.
    5. Wang, Hong & Forbes, Catherine S. & Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Vaz, John, 2020. "The determinants of bank loan recovery rates in good times and bad – New evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 875-897.
    6. Fan, Jianqing & Jiang, Bai & Sun, Qiang, 2022. "Bayesian factor-adjusted sparse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 3-19.
    7. Kastner, Gregor, 2019. "Sparse Bayesian time-varying covariance estimation in many dimensions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 98-115.
    8. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
    9. Deborah Bentivoglio & Adele Finco & Mirian Rumenos Piedade Bacchi, 2016. "Interdependencies between Biofuel, Fuel and Food Prices: The Case of the Brazilian Ethanol Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Martin Feldkircher & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & Michael Pfarrhofer, 2022. "APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND FORECASTING IN HUGE‐DIMENSIONAL MULTICOUNTRY VARs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1625-1658, November.
    11. Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2022. "On incentive-compatible estimators," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 204-220.
    12. Ruixin Guo & Hongtu Zhu & Sy-Miin Chow & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2012. "Bayesian Lasso for Semiparametric Structural Equation Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 567-577, June.
    13. Oguzhan Cepni & I. Ethem Guney & Norman R. Swanson, 2020. "Forecasting and nowcasting emerging market GDP growth rates: The role of latent global economic policy uncertainty and macroeconomic data surprise factors," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 18-36, January.
    14. Francesca Caselli & Matilde Faralli & Paolo Manasse & Ugo Panizza, 2021. "On the Benefits of Repaying," IMF Working Papers 2021/233, International Monetary Fund.
    15. Mehran Aflakparast & Mathisca de Gunst & Wessel van Wieringen, 2020. "Analysis of Twitter data with the Bayesian fused graphical lasso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    16. Hauzenberger, Niko, 2021. "Flexible Mixture Priors for Large Time-varying Parameter Models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 87-108.
    17. Korobilis, Dimitris, 2015. "Quantile forecasts of inflation under model uncertainty," MPRA Paper 64341, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Chan, Joshua C.C., 2021. "Minnesota-type adaptive hierarchical priors for large Bayesian VARs," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1212-1226.
    19. Wang, Jiqian & He, Xiaofeng & Ma, Feng & Li, Pan, 2022. "Uncertainty and oil volatility: Evidence from shrinkage method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Giorgio E. Primiceri, 2021. "Economic Predictions With Big Data: The Illusion of Sparsity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2409-2437, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1330-:d:900239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.