IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1034-d863842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Greenhouse Tomato Foliage Temperature Using DNN and ML Models

Author

Listed:
  • Roei Grimberg

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organisation, Volcani Center, HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

  • Meir Teitel

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organisation, Volcani Center, HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Shay Ozer

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organisation, Volcani Center, HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Asher Levi

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organisation, Volcani Center, HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel)

  • Avi Levy

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel)

Abstract

Since leaf temperature (LT) is not a trivial measurement, deep-neural networks (DNN) and machine learning (ML) models were evaluated in this study as tools for estimating foliage temperature. Two DNN methods were used. The first DNN used convolutional layers, while the second DNN was based on fully-connected layers and was trained by cross-validation techniques. The machine learning used the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) method for LT estimation. All models used the meteorological and microclimatic parameters (hereafter referred to as features) of the examined greenhouses to determine the average foliage temperature. The models were trained on 75% of the collected data and tested on the remaining 25%. RMS and absolute error were used to evaluate the performance of the different models compared to the LT values measured by a thermal camera. In addition, after finding the correlation of each feature to the leaf temperature, the models were trained based on the high-correlated features only. The machine learning model was superior to DNN when all available features were used and when only high-correlated features were used, resulting in errors of 0.7 °C and 0.8 °C, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Roei Grimberg & Meir Teitel & Shay Ozer & Asher Levi & Avi Levy, 2022. "Estimation of Greenhouse Tomato Foliage Temperature Using DNN and ML Models," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1034-:d:863842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1034/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1034/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, B.A. & Shellie, K.C., 2016. "Evaluation of neural network modeling to predict non-water-stressed leaf temperature in wine grape for calculation of crop water stress index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 38-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihun Kim & Il Do Ha & Sookhee Kwon & Ikhoon Jang & Myung Hwan Na, 2023. "A Smart Farm DNN Survival Model Considering Tomato Farm Effect," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levin, Alexander D., 2019. "Re-evaluating pressure chamber methods of water status determination in field-grown grapevine (Vitis spp.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 422-429.
    2. Kumar, Navsal & Adeloye, Adebayo J. & Shankar, Vijay & Rustum, Rabee, 2020. "Neural computing modelling of the crop water stress index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Krista C. Shellie & Bradley A. King, 2020. "Application of a Daily Crop Water Stress Index to Deficit Irrigate Malbec Grapevine under Semi-Arid Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Melo, Leonardo Leite de & Melo, Verônica Gaspar Martins Leite de & Marques, Patrícia Angélica Alves & Frizzone, Jose Antônio & Coelho, Rubens Duarte & Romero, Roseli Aparecida Francelin & Barros, Timó, 2022. "Deep learning for identification of water deficits in sugarcane based on thermal images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Ramírez-Cuesta, J.M. & Ortuño, M.F. & Gonzalez-Dugo, V. & Zarco-Tejada, P.J. & Parra, M. & Rubio-Asensio, J.S. & Intrigliolo, D.S., 2022. "Assessment of peach trees water status and leaf gas exchange using on-the-ground versus airborne-based thermal imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    6. King, B.A. & Tarkalson, D.D. & Sharma, V. & Bjorneberg, D.L., 2021. "Thermal Crop Water Stress Index Base Line Temperatures for Sugarbeet in Arid Western U.S," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1034-:d:863842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.