IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i5p595-d800755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

QTL Mapping of Leaf Area Index and Chlorophyll Content Based on UAV Remote Sensing in Wheat

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Wang

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
    Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Xue Gao

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Yukun Cheng

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Yi Ren

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Zhihui Zhang

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Rui Wang

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Junmei Cao

    (Research Institute of Grain Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China)

  • Hongwei Geng

    (College of Agronomy, High Quality Special Wheat Crop Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

Abstract

High-throughput phenotypic identification is a prerequisite for large-scale identification and gene mining of important traits. However, existing work has rarely leveraged high-throughput phenotypic identification into quantitative trait locus (QTL) acquisition in wheat crops. Clarifying the feasibility and effectiveness of high-throughput phenotypic data obtained from UAV multispectral images in gene mining of important traits is an urgent problem to be solved in wheat. In this paper, 309 lines of the spring wheat Worrakatta × Berkut recombinant inbred line (RIL) were taken as materials. First, we obtained the leaf area index (LAI) including flowering, filling, and mature stages, as well as the flag leaf chlorophyll content (CC) including heading, flowering, and filling stages, from multispectral images under normal irrigation and drought stress, respectively. Then, on the basis of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI), which were determined by multispectral imagery, the LAI and CC were comprehensively estimated through the classification and regression tree (CART) and cross-validation algorithms. Finally, we identified the QTLs by analyzing the predicted and measured values. The results show that the predicted values of determination coefficient ( R 2 ) ranged from 0.79 to 0.93, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.30 to 1.05, and the relative error (RE) ranged from 0.01 to 0.18. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients of predicted and measured values ranged from 0.93 to 0.94 for CC and from 0.80 to 0.92 for LAI at different wheat growth stages under normal irrigation and drought stress. Additionally, a linkage map of this RIL population was constructed by 11,375 SNPs; eight QTLs were detected for LAI on wheat chromosomes 1BL, 2BL (four QTLs), 3BL, 5BS, and 5DL, and three QTLs were detected for CC on chromosomes 1DS (two QTLs) and 3AL. The closely linked QTLs formed two regions on chromosome 2BL (from 54 to 56 cM and from 96 to 101 cM, respectively) and one region on 1DS (from 26 to 27 cM). Each QTL explained phenotypic variation for LAI from 2.5% to 13.8% and for CC from 2.5% to 5.8%. For LAI, two QTLs were identified at the flowering stage, two QTLs were identified at the filling stage, and three QTLs were identified at the maturity stage, among which QLAI.xjau-5DL-pre was detected at both filling and maturity stages. For CC, two QTLs were detected at the heading stage and one QTL was identified at the flowering stage, among which QCC.xjau-1DS was detected at both stages. Three QTLs ( QLAI.xjau-2BL-pre.2 , QLAI.xjau-2BL.2 , and QLAI.xjau-3BL-pre ) for LAI were identified under drought stress conditions. Five QTLs for LAI and two QTLs for CC were detected by imagery-predicted values, while four QTLs for LAI and two QTLs for CC were identified by manual measurement values. Lastly, investigations of these QTLs on the wheat reference genome identified 10 candidate genes associated with LAI and three genes associated with CC, belonging to F-box family proteins, peroxidase, GATA transcription factor, C 2 H 2 zinc finger structural protein, etc., which are involved in the regulation of crop growth and development, signal transduction, and response to drought stress. These findings reveal that UAV sensing technology has relatively high reliability for phenotyping wheat LAI and CC, which can play an important role in crop genetic improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Wang & Xue Gao & Yukun Cheng & Yi Ren & Zhihui Zhang & Rui Wang & Junmei Cao & Hongwei Geng, 2022. "QTL Mapping of Leaf Area Index and Chlorophyll Content Based on UAV Remote Sensing in Wheat," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:595-:d:800755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corey Lesk & Pedram Rowhani & Navin Ramankutty, 2016. "Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7584), pages 84-87, January.
    2. Wanneng Yang & Zilong Guo & Chenglong Huang & Lingfeng Duan & Guoxing Chen & Ni Jiang & Wei Fang & Hui Feng & Weibo Xie & Xingming Lian & Gongwei Wang & Qingming Luo & Qifa Zhang & Qian Liu & Lizhong , 2014. "Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanxin Zhang & Hao Feng & Shaoyu Han & Zhengkai Shi & Haoran Xu & Yang Liu & Haikuan Feng & Chengquan Zhou & Jibo Yue, 2022. "Monitoring of Soybean Maturity Using UAV Remote Sensing and Deep Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Yu Wang & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Tian Zhang & Wenhui Zhang, 2022. "Identifying and Counting Tobacco Plants in Fragmented Terrains Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images in Beipanjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro del Pozo & Nidia Brunel-Saldias & Alejandra Engler & Samuel Ortega-Farias & Cesar Acevedo-Opazo & Gustavo A. Lobos & Roberto Jara-Rojas & Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, 2019. "Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies of Agriculture in Mediterranean-Climate Regions (MCRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Kedi Liu & Ranran Wang & Inge Schrijver & Rutger Hoekstra, 2024. "Can we project well-being? Towards integral well-being projections in climate models and beyond," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. El-Saied E. Metwaly & Hatim M. Al-Yasi & Esmat F. Ali & Hamada A. Farouk & Saad Farouk, 2022. "Deteriorating Harmful Effects of Drought in Cucumber by Spraying Glycinebetaine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. repec:ags:aaea22:335489 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen & Pavinee Chanvichit, 2024. "Historical Analysis of the Effects of Drought on Rice and Maize Yields in Southeast Asia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. N. Zhang & H. Huang, 2018. "Assessment of world disaster severity processed by Gaussian blur based on large historical data: casualties as an evaluating indicator," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 173-187, May.
    8. Liu, Zhipeng & Jiao, Xiyun & Zhu, Chengli & Katul, Gabriel G. & Ma, Junyong & Guo, Weihua, 2021. "Micro-climatic and crop responses to micro-sprinkler irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Teresa Armada Brás & Jonas Jägermeyr & Júlia Seixas, 2019. "Exposure of the EU-28 food imports to extreme weather disasters in exporting countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1373-1393, December.
    10. Singh, Kuntal & McClean, Colin J. & Büker, Patrick & Hartley, Sue E. & Hill, Jane K., 2017. "Mapping regional risks from climate change for rainfed rice cultivation in India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 76-84.
    11. Marcinkowski, Paweł & Piniewski, Mikołaj, 2024. "Future changes in crop yield over Poland driven by climate change, increasing atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen stress," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Yusifzada, Tural, 2022. "Response of Inflation to the Climate Stress: Evidence from Azerbaijan," MPRA Paper 116522, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Sep 2022.
    13. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Phetheet, Jirapat & Hill, Mary C. & Barron, Robert W. & Gray, Benjamin J. & Wu, Hongyu & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Heger, Wade & Kisekka, Isaya & Golden, Bill & Rossi, Matthew W., 2021. "Relating agriculture, energy, and water decisions to farm incomes and climate projections using two freeware programs, FEWCalc and DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Francisco Costa & Fabien Forge & Jason Garred & João Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "The Impact of Climate Change on Risk and Return in Indian Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Balázs Varga & Zsuzsanna Farkas & Emese Varga-László & Gyula Vida & Ottó Veisz, 2022. "Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 Concentration Influences the Rooting Habits of Winter-Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Qimeng Pan & Lysa Porth & Hong Li, 2022. "Assessing the Effectiveness of the Actuaries Climate Index for Estimating the Impact of Extreme Weather on Crop Yield and Insurance Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Shahzad, Muhammad Faisal & Abdulai, Awudu, 2020. "Adaptation to extreme weather conditions and farm performance in rural Pakistan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Kelly R. Wilson & Robert L. Myers & Mary K. Hendrickson & Emily A. Heaton, 2022. "Different Stakeholders’ Conceptualizations and Perspectives of Regenerative Agriculture Reveals More Consensus Than Discord," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    21. Bohan, David & Schmucki, Reto & Abay, Abrha & Termansen, Mette & Bane, Miranda & Charalabiis, Alice & Cong, Rong-Gang & Derocles, Stephane & Dorner, Zita & Forster, Matthieu & Gibert, Caroline & Harro, 2020. "Designing farmer-acceptable rotations that assure ecosystem service provision inthe face of climate change," MPRA Paper 112313, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:595-:d:800755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.