IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i4p555-d793092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Tillage and Fertilization on CO 2 Emission from Soil under Maize Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana Salinas-Alcántara

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Rocio Vaca

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Pedro del Águila

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Nadia de la Portilla-López

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Gustavo Yáñez-Ocampo

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Laura A. Sánchez-Paz

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

  • Jorge A. Lugo

    (Laboratorio de Edafología y Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario No. 100, Toluca 50000, Mexico)

Abstract

Agriculture is in a constant state of change. Its new practices and technologies represent impacts that are difficult to predict. The transition from animal traction to tractors and the substitution of manure for synthetic fertilizers are changes that are taking place particularly in developed countries, yet they are increasing in developing ones. However, the effect of these changes on agriculture and soil CO 2 emissions remains controversial. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of two tillage systems and fertilization on the CO 2 emissions from the soil under maize cultivation. Therefore, it consisted of two tillage systems, namely tractor (T) and animal (A) traction, and four fertilization methods. The fertilization treatments tested were: (CH) application of N, P, K chemical fertilizer; (HM) application of horse manure; (CM) application of chicken manure; and (CT) unfertilized control. We found that the soil CO 2 emission rates in the maize growing season was higher than those in the tillage before the harvest season. Soil respiration peaked in June after the second fertilizer application (9394.59–12,851.35 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 at tractor and 7091.89–12,655.86 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 at animal traction). The production of corn grain only presented differences between the treatments with and without application of fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana Salinas-Alcántara & Rocio Vaca & Pedro del Águila & Nadia de la Portilla-López & Gustavo Yáñez-Ocampo & Laura A. Sánchez-Paz & Jorge A. Lugo, 2022. "Impact of Tillage and Fertilization on CO 2 Emission from Soil under Maize Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:555-:d:793092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/4/555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schramski, J.R. & Jacobsen, K.L. & Smith, T.W. & Williams, M.A. & Thompson, T.M., 2013. "Energy as a potential systems-level indicator of sustainability in organic agriculture: Case study model of a diversified, organic vegetable production system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 267(C), pages 102-114.
    2. Dejie Kong & Nana Liu & Chengjie Ren & Huiying Li & Weiyu Wang & Na Li & Guangxin Ren & Yongzhong Feng & Gaihe Yang, 2020. "Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil CO 2 Emission Depends on Crop Rotation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jónsson, Jón Örvar G. & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P. & Giannakis, Georgios V., 2019. "Tools for Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Ecosystem Services, EROI and Economic Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 109-119.
    2. Giuseppe Todde & Lelia Murgia & Maria Caria & Antonio Pazzona, 2018. "A Comprehensive Energy Analysis and Related Carbon Footprint of Dairy Farms, Part 2: Investigation and Modeling of Indirect Energy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Carl F. Jordan, 2016. "The Farm as a Thermodynamic System: Implications of the Maximum Power Principle," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred & Reddy, D. Narasimha & Venkatanarayana, M. & Harriss-White, Barbara, 2016. "System of Rice Intensification provides environmental and economic gains but at the expense of social sustainability — A multidisciplinary analysis in India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 159-168.
    5. Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues, 2021. "Direct and indirect energy consumption in farming: Impacts from fertilizer use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Maria Lampridi & Dimitrios Kateris & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Energy Footprint of Mechanized Agricultural Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Roberto Mancinelli & Sara Marinari & Mariam Atait & Verdiana Petroselli & Gabriele Chilosi & Merima Jasarevic & Alessia Catalani & Zainul Abideen & Morad Mirzaei & Mohamed Allam & Emanuele Radicetti, 2023. "Durum Wheat–Potato Crop Rotation, Soil Tillage, and Fertilization Source Affect Soil CO 2 Emission and C Storage in the Mediterranean Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Martinho, V.J.P.D., 2020. "Relationships between agricultural energy and farming indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:555-:d:793092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.