IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2160-d1004584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spider Mites Detection in Wheat Field Based on an Improved RetinaNet

Author

Listed:
  • Denghao Pang

    (School of Internet, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Hong Wang

    (School of Internet, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Peng Chen

    (School of Internet, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Dong Liang

    (School of Internet, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Agro-Ecological Big Data Analysis & Application, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

As a daily staple food of more than one third of the world’s population, wheat is one of the main food crops in the world. The increase in wheat production will help meet the current global food security needs. In the process of wheat growth, diseases and insect pests have great influence on the yield, which leads to a significant decline. Wheat spider mites are the most harmful to wheat because they are too small to be found. Therefore, how to use deep learning to identify small pests is a hot spot in modern intelligent agriculture research. In this paper, we propose an improved RetinaNet model and train it on our own dataset of wheat spider mites. Firstly, the wheat spider mites dataset is expanded from 1959 to 9215 by using two different angles and image segmentation methods. Secondly, the wheat spider mite feature detection head is added to improve the identification of small targets. Thirdly, the feature pyramid in FPN is further optimized, and the high-resolution feature maps are fully utilized to fuse the regression information of shallow feature maps and the semantic information of deep feature maps. Finally, the anchor generation strategy is optimized according to the amount of mites. Experimental results on the newly established wheat mite dataset validated our proposed model, yielding 81.7% mAP, which is superior to other advanced object detection methods in detecting wheat spider mites.

Suggested Citation

  • Denghao Pang & Hong Wang & Peng Chen & Dong Liang, 2022. "Spider Mites Detection in Wheat Field Based on an Improved RetinaNet," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2160-:d:1004584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Du & Yaqin Sun & Shuo Chen & Jiedong Feng & Yindi Zhao & Zhigang Yan & Xuewei Zhang & Yuchen Bian, 2022. "A Novel Object Detection Model Based on Faster R-CNN for Spodoptera frugiperda According to Feeding Trace of Corn Leaves," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Gurdeep Singh Malhi & Manpreet Kaur & Prashant Kaushik, 2021. "Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahboobe Ghobadi & Mahdi Gheysari & Mohammad Shayannejad & Hamze Dokoohaki, 2023. "Analyzing the Effects of Planting Date on the Uncertainty of CERES-Maize and Its Potential to Reduce Yield Gap in Arid and Mediterranean Climates," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Singh, Ajay Kumar & Ashraf, Shah Nawaz & Sharma, Sandeep Kumar, 2023. "Farmer’s Perception on Climatic Factors and Social-economic Characteristics in the Agricultural Sector of Gujarat," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 4(1), March.
    3. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Sanjeev Kumar & Ajay K. Singh, 2023. "Modeling the effects of climate change on agricultural productivity: evidence from Himachal Pradesh, India," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 521-548, June.
    5. Shobande, Olatunji A. & Asongu, Simplice A., 2022. "The Critical Role of Education and ICT in Promoting Environmental Sustainability in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Panel VAR Approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Anna Lyjak, 2021. "Analysis of Changes in Agricultural Use of Land After Poland’s Accession to the EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 517-533.
    7. Sayamol Charoenratana & Cholnapa Anukul & Peter M. Rosset, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and Food Security: Livelihood Strategies Pursued by Farmers during the Maize Monoculture Boom in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Antonio Valente & Carlos Costa & Leonor Pereira & Bruno Soares & José Lima & Salviano Soares, 2022. "A LoRaWAN IoT System for Smart Agriculture for Vine Water Status Determination," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Dae-Ho Jung & Jung-Eek Son, 2021. "CO 2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Peres Ofori, 2021. "Mortgage market and climate variability adaptation: evidence from the mortgage market in emerging cities," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Marius Mihai Micu & Toma Adrian Dinu & Gina Fintineru & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Elena Stoian & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Paula Stoicea & Adina Iorga, 2022. "Climate Change—Between “Myth and Truth” in Romanian Farmers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Taifeng Yang & Xuetao Huang & Yue Wang & Houjian Li & Lili Guo, 2022. "Dynamic Linkages among Climate Change, Mechanization and Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Carotti, Laura & Pistillo, Alessandro & Zauli, Ilaria & Meneghello, Davide & Martin, Michael & Pennisi, Giuseppina & Gianquinto, Giorgio & Orsini, Francesco, 2023. "Improving water use efficiency in vertical farming: Effects of growing systems, far-red radiation and planting density on lettuce cultivation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Huaquan Zhang & Yashuang Tang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, 2022. "Measuring the Effects of Climate Change on Wheat Production: Evidence from Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Adel Benhamed & Yousif Osman & Ousama Ben-Salha & Zied Jaidi, 2023. "Unveiling the Spatial Effects of Climate Change on Economic Growth: International Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Ahmed Awad & Wan Luo & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Mustafa El-Rawy & Hesham N. Farres & Mohamed EL-Sayed Gabr, 2021. "Farmers’ Awareness in the Context of Climate Change: An Underutilized Way for Ensuring Sustainable Farmland Adaptation and Surface Water Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Karolina Ratajczak & Hanna Sulewska & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Agnieszka Faligowska & Grażyna Szymańska, 2023. "Phytostimulator Application after Cold Stress for Better Maize ( Zea mays L.) Plant Recovery," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Jiaxu Ling & Yongji Xue & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Farmers’ Awareness of Climate Change on Their Willingness to Adopt Low-Carbon Production: Based on the TAM-SOR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Monika Puchlik & Janina Piekutin & Katarzyna Dyczewska, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on Surface Water Quality in North-Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Li-Tao Yang & Yong-Gang Sun & Chuan Jiang & Jun-Fang Zhao & Jin-Xia Qian, 2023. "Vulnerability Assessment of Potato Growth to Climate Change Based on GIS in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2160-:d:1004584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.