IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1672-d939613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applications of Nanotechnology-Based Agrochemicals in Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture: An Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Fahad Khan

    (Department of Biotechnology, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, 19, Knowledge Park-II, Institutional Area, Greater Noida 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Pratibha Pandey

    (Department of Biotechnology, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, 19, Knowledge Park-II, Institutional Area, Greater Noida 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Tarun Kumar Upadhyay

    (Department of Biotechnology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences and Centre of Research for Development, Parul University, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India)

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture is crucial for stimulating both developing and developed countries. Agriculture needs modernization and innovation to meet the increasing demands of food for the growing global population and to maintain environmental sustainability simultaneously. Nanotechnology has gained wider attention in food safety improvement and environment protection by augmenting the efficacy of agricultural inputs and giving potent solutions to agricultural issues for improving food security and productivity. Modern agricultural practices have been found to be associated with the degradation of the environment, ecosystems, and land due to agricultural pollution. Our review provides a detailed insight into the recent developments in nanotechnology-based agrochemicals which have transformed the agriculture sector with better plant growth, crop yields, nano-facilitated soil remediation, and identifying environmental contaminants. The incorporation of nanoscale bioagrochemicals such as nano-pesticides, nano-fertilizers, nanoformulations, and nanosensors in agriculture has revolutionized the traditional agro-practices making them more sustainable, ingenious, and environmentally efficient. Furthermore, we also list recently explored nanotechnology-based agrochemicals including nanocomposites that have significantly overcome the crucial issues associated with food packaging and agricultural sustainability. However, further research is still warranted to study their migration in food products and their environmental implications. Altogether, this review will be highly beneficial for future researchers to understand and exploit the potential of nanomaterials for better food security and sustainable agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahad Khan & Pratibha Pandey & Tarun Kumar Upadhyay, 2022. "Applications of Nanotechnology-Based Agrochemicals in Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture: An Overview," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1672-:d:939613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siegel, Karen M. & Bastos Lima, Mairon G., 2020. "When international sustainability frameworks encounter domestic politics: The sustainable development goals and agri-food governance in South America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Katia Vladimirova & David Le Blanc, 2015. "How well are the links between education and other sustainable development goals covered in UN flagship reports? A contribution to the study of the science-policy interface on education in the UN syst," Working Papers 146, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    3. Prue F.E. Addison & P. J. Stephenson & Joseph W. Bull & Giulia Carbone & Mark Burgman & Michael J. Burgass & Leah R. Gerber & Pippa Howard & Nadine McCormick & Louise McRae & Kim E. Reuter & Malcolm S, 2020. "Bringing sustainability to life: A framework to guide biodiversity indicator development for business performance management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3303-3313, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camelia Teodorescu & Marin Burcea & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Florentina-Cristina Merciu & Adrian-Nicolae Jipa & Laurenţiu-Ştefan Szemkovics, 2023. "Swine Breeding in the Villages of Vâlcea County, Oltenia (Romania)—Tradition or Necessity?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Nikola Cvetković & Aleksandar Đoković & Milan Dobrota & Milan Radojičić, 2023. "New Methodology for Corn Stress Detection Using Remote Sensing and Vegetation Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Aminullah, Erman, 2024. "Forecasting of technology innovation and economic growth in Indonesia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Lin Zhang & Jinyan Chen & Faustino Dinis & Sha Wei & Chengzhi Cai, 2022. "Decoupling Effect, Driving Factors and Prediction Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction and Product Supply Guarantee in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornelia Guell & Catherine R. Brown & Otto W. Navunicagi & Viliamu Iese & Neela Badrie & Morgan Wairiu & Arlette Saint Ville & Nigel Unwin, 2022. "Perspectives on strengthening local food systems in Small Island Developing States," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1227-1240, October.
    2. Gloria Novovic, 2022. "Can Agenda 2030 bring about “localization”? Policy limitations of Agenda 2030 in the broader global governance system," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    3. T. B. White & S. O. Petrovan & L. A. Bennun & T. Butterworth & A. P. Christie & H. Downey & S. B. Hunter & B. R. Jobson & S. O. S. E. zu Ermgassen & W. J. Sutherland, 2023. "Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4719-4733, November.
    4. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Francesco Ranalli & Riccardo Camilli, 2022. "La pianificazione della sostenibilit? nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 109-134.
    6. Ya-Ching Chang & Hsing-Lung Lien, 2020. "Mapping Course Sustainability by Embedding the SDGs Inventory into the University Curriculum: A Case Study from National University of Kaohsiung in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Magdalena Jelonek & Maria Urbaniec, 2019. "Development of Sustainability Competencies for the Labour Market: An Exploratory Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. STEFANOVA, Julia Stoyancheva, 2022. "Problems And Prospects To Sustainable Development In Covid-19 “New Normal”: Evidence From Western Balkans’ Stock Markets," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 26(3), pages 6-34, September.
    9. -, 2018. "Methodological guide on planning for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Latin America and the Caribbean," Documentos de Proyectos 44193, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni & Antonio Chirico, 2022. "The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five‐dimensional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3216-3230, November.
    11. José A. Puppim de Oliveira & Umesh Mukhi & Camilla Quental & Paulo Jordão de Oliveira Cerqueira Fortes, 2022. "Connecting businesses and biodiversity conservation through community organizing: The case of babassu breaker women in Brazil," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2618-2634, July.
    12. Meisam Ranjbari & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi & Simone Domenico Scagnelli & Peer-Olaf Siebers & Francesco Quatraro, 2021. "Recovery agenda for sustainable development post COVID-19 at the country level: developing a fuzzy action priority surface," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16646-16673, November.
    13. Frank Biermann & Thomas Hickmann & Carole-Anne Sénit & Marianne Beisheim & Steven Bernstein & Pamela Chasek & Leonie Grob & Rakhyun E. Kim & Louis J. Kotzé & Måns Nilsson & Andrea Ordóñez Llanos & Chu, 2022. "Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 795-800, September.
    14. Gizachew Berhanu Gelet & Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael & Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene, 2023. "The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Ilija Djekic & Laura Batlle-Bayer & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Anet Režek Jambrak, 2021. "Role of the Food Supply Chain Stakeholders in Achieving UN SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Guarini, Giulio & Laureti, Tiziana & Garofalo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Territorial and individual educational inequality: A Capability Approach analysis for Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 247-262.
    17. Thomas B. White & Leonardo R. Viana & Geneviève Campbell & Claire Elverum & Leon A. Bennun, 2021. "Using technology to improve the management of development impacts on biodiversity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3502-3516, December.
    18. Rambla, Xavier & Langthaler, Margarita, 2016. "The SDGs and inclusive education for all: From special education to addressing social inequalities," Briefing Papers 14, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    19. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Gemma Burford & Peter Tamás & Marie K. Harder, 2016. "Can We Improve Indicator Design for Complex Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison of a Values-Based and Conventional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-38, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1672-:d:939613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.