IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i8p737-d607393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Maize Seed Productivity in Mexico between 1983 and 2018 with the Adoption of Genetically Modified Maize and the Resilience of Local Races

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Santillán-Fernández

    (Catedrático-Conacyt, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Campeche, Champotón, Campeche 24450, Mexico
    International Doctorate Program of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of the Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 27002 Lugo, Spain)

  • Yolanda Salinas-Moreno

    (Department of Genetic, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Campus Altos de Jalisco, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco 47600, Mexico)

  • José René Valdez-Lazalde

    (Department of Forestry, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México 56230, Mexico)

  • Mauricio Antonio Carmona-Arellano

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Campeche, Champotón, Campeche 24450, Mexico)

  • Javier Enrique Vera-López

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Campeche, Champotón, Campeche 24450, Mexico)

  • Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo

    (Department of Plant Production and Engineering Projects, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Galicia, 27002 Lugo, Spain)

Abstract

Mexico depends on maize imports to satisfy its national demand. The use of native maize varieties among subsistence farmers can help to reduce the cereal’s imports. However, the agricultural policy in Mexico to improve the productivity per hectare has centered on the use of improved varieties; among them, the transgenic variety. In this study, the maize productivity in Mexico from 1983 to 2018 was analyzed to determine the influence of agricultural policies in the sector, and the factors that condition the adoption of transgenic maize. It was found that the agricultural policy improved the productivity of those regions with irrigation; however, for rainfed regions, the expected technological changes were not achieved because the ancestral tradition in cultivation, associated with the greater variety of native maize and to a larger indigenous population, was stronger. The adoption of transgenic maize also had low significance in the rainfed regions, since the increase in field yields is not economically profitable with regards to the increase in production costs. Therefore, the agricultural policy to increase productivity ought to be directed at the protection of subsistence farmers, revaluing the use of native varieties that have shown higher resilience to technological and environmental changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Santillán-Fernández & Yolanda Salinas-Moreno & José René Valdez-Lazalde & Mauricio Antonio Carmona-Arellano & Javier Enrique Vera-López & Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo, 2021. "Relationship between Maize Seed Productivity in Mexico between 1983 and 2018 with the Adoption of Genetically Modified Maize and the Resilience of Local Races," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:8:p:737-:d:607393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khondoker Abdul Mottaleb & Alexander Loladze & Kai Sonder & Gideon Kruseman & Felix San Vicente, 2019. "Threats of Tar Spot Complex disease of maize in the United States of America and its global consequences," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 281-300, February.
    2. Alberto Santillán-Fernández & Yolanda Salinas-Moreno & José René Valdez-Lazalde & Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Scientific Production about Genetically Modified Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Wallace E. Huffman & Yu Jin & Zheng Xu, 2018. "The economic impacts of technology and climate change: New evidence from U.S. corn yields," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 463-479, July.
    4. Sergio Juárez-Hernández & Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, 2020. "Assessing the potential of alternative farming practices for sustainable energy and water use and GHG mitigation in conventional maize systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 8029-8059, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Santillán-Fernández & Yolanda Salinas-Moreno & José René Valdez-Lazalde & Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Scientific Production about Genetically Modified Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    3. Jerome Dumortier & Miguel Carriquiry & Amani Elobeid, 2021. "Impact of climate change on global agricultural markets under different shared socioeconomic pathways," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 963-984, November.
    4. Seungki Lee & Yongjie Ji & GianCarlo Moschini, 2021. "Agricultural Innovation and Adaptation to Climate Change: Insights from Genetically Engineered Maize," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 21-wp616, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Yonglei Zhang & Huanchen Tang & Donghai Yan, 2024. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Industrial Structure Adjustment: A Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Lee, Yunkyung, 2020. "Potential economic consequences of gene-edited technology on the U.S. soybean market," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304241, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Njuki, Eric, 2021. "Nonlinear weather and climate-induced effects on hired farm labor wages: Evidence from the U.S. Cornbelt," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313959, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Kruseman, Gideon & Dermawan, Ahmad & Diagne, Mandiaye & Enahoro, Dolapo & Frija, Aymen & Gatto, Marcel & Gbegbelegbe, Sika & Komarek, Adam M. & Mausch, Kai & Mottaleb, Khondoker, 2021. "Foresight for income and employment: What can we learn for agricultural research for development," SocArXiv 783rw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Chancellor, Will & Hughes, Neal & Zhao, Shiji & Soh, Wei Ying & Valle, Haydn & Boult, Christopher, 2021. "Controlling for the effects of climate on total factor productivity: A case study of Australian farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Eric Njuki & Boris E Bravo-Ureta & Víctor E Cabrera, 2020. "Climatic effects and total factor productivity: econometric evidence for Wisconsin dairy farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(3), pages 1276-1301.
    11. Michée A. Lachaud & Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta & Carlos E. Ludena, 2022. "Economic effects of climate change on agricultural production and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 321-332, March.
    12. Matin Qaim, 2020. "Role of New Plant Breeding Technologies for Food Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 129-150, June.
    13. Isaac Korku Dorgbetor & Gabrijel Ondrasek & Hrvoje Kutnjak & Ornella Mikuš, 2022. "What If the World Went Vegan? A Review of the Impact on Natural Resources, Climate Change, and Economies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Lee, Yunkyung, 2021. "Potential market and welfare effects of genetically edited technology in U.S. soybean production," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314058, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Ceballos-Sierra, Federico & Dall'Erba, Sandy, 2021. "The effect of climate variability on Colombian coffee productivity: A dynamic panel model approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Jerome Dumortier & Miguel Carriquiry & Amani Elobeid, 2023. "Interactions Between U.S. Vehicle Electrification, Climate Change, and Global Agricultural Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 99-123, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:8:p:737-:d:607393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.