IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i11p1164-d682373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Indicators and Soybean Production in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Marley Nunes Vituri Toloi

    (Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, Dr. Bacelar Street 1212, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil
    Federal Institute of the Mato Grosso, Rondonópolis 78721-520, Brazil)

  • Silvia Helena Bonilla

    (Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, Dr. Bacelar Street 1212, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Carlo Toloi

    (Federal Institute of the Mato Grosso, Rondonópolis 78721-520, Brazil)

  • Helton Raimundo Oliveira Silva

    (Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, Dr. Bacelar Street 1212, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Irenilza de Alencar Nääs

    (Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University—UNIP, Dr. Bacelar Street 1212, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

Abstract

Due to its agricultural potential, land extensions, and favorable climate, Brazil is one of the largest producers and exporters of various agricultural products. A significant part of this production is placed in Mato Grosso, the primary national producer of several agricultural commodities. The soybean complex alone produced more than 33 million tons of soybean for the 2019/2020 harvest, representing 27% of national production. The economic potential that the soybean commodity represents is linked to the increase in demand for inputs, planted area, production, and productivity. Given these factors, the present study aims to analyze how the largest municipalities of soybean production behave, and the degree of interaction and positive associations between the economic potential promoted by soybean production and the economic/social development and environmental impacts in the Mato Grosso State, Brazil. The methodology was to categorize the thirty largest soybean producing municipalities, using the factor analysis method for selected indicators. The interpretation is made through the adoption of the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework. The results indicated that the groups formed are not homogeneous in terms of socio-economic and environmental development. The three factors that formed, were interpreted using the DPSIR are characterized by the significant influence of the population, reflect on its development, how economic activities are other and not just agriculture. The second also belongs to the driver in the DPSRI framework group. It is associated with the soybean production indicator, implying larger planting areas, generating jobs focused on agricultural activities. The interpretation is made through the adoption of the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework. The results indicated that the groups formed are not homogeneous in terms of socio-economic and environmental development. The significant influence of the population characterizes the three found factors. The first reflects on the region’s development and how other economic activities (not just agriculture) are carried on. The second also belongs to the driver in the DPSRI framework group, and it is associated with the soybean production indicator, generating jobs focused on agricultural activities. The third group, formed by municipalities in the Amazon region, with environmental factors associated with large geographical areas, extensive native forests, and more significant carbon sequestration, considers the DPSRI framework’s impacts. Showing that there are behavior patterns and taking this into account is the optimal way to use the predictors appropriately. Municipalities are expected to be more reactive to some changes than to others to achieve a good level of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Marley Nunes Vituri Toloi & Silvia Helena Bonilla & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Helton Raimundo Oliveira Silva & Irenilza de Alencar Nääs, 2021. "Development Indicators and Soybean Production in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:11:p:1164-:d:682373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/11/1164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emerson Rodolfo Abraham & João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Oduvaldo Vendrametto & Pedro Luiz de Oliveira Costa Neto & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Aguinaldo Eduardo de Souza & Marcos de Oliveira Morais, 2020. "Time Series Prediction with Artificial Neural Networks: An Analysis Using Brazilian Soybean Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Pedro Sanches Amorim & José António Sarsfield Pereira Cabral & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi, 2020. "The Impact of Logistics Performance on Argentina, Brazil, and the US Soybean Exports from 2012 to 2018: A Gravity Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Peter Richards & Heitor Pellegrina & Leah VanWey & Stephanie Spera, 2015. "Soybean Development: The Impact of a Decade of Agricultural Change on Urban and Economic Growth in Mato Grosso, Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Costa & Britaldo Soares-Filho & Rodrigo Nobrega, 2022. "Can the Brazilian National Logistics Plan Induce Port Competitiveness by Reshaping the Port Service Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Md Mahbubar Rahman & Arup Dey & Nita Yodo & Chiwon W. Lee & David Grewell, 2023. "Soybean By-Products Bioplastic (Polylactic Acid)-Based Plant Containers: Sustainable Development and Performance Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Xue-Bo Jin & Wen-Tao Gong & Jian-Lei Kong & Yu-Ting Bai & Ting-Li Su, 2022. "PFVAE: A Planar Flow-Based Variational Auto-Encoder Prediction Model for Time Series Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Almut Schilling-Vacaflor, 2021. "Integrating Human Rights and the Environment in Supply Chain Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Peter Richards & Tom Reardon & David Tschirley & Thom Jayne & Jim Oehmke & David Atwood, 2016. "Cities and the future of agriculture and food security: a policy and programmatic roundtable," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 871-877, August.
    5. Lisa L. Rausch & Holly K. Gibbs, 2016. "Property Arrangements and Soy Governance in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso: Implications for Deforestation-Free Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, Rafaela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Burns, Georgette Leah & Ross, Helen & Biggs, Duan, 2024. "‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Michelle C. A. Picoli & Ana Rorato & Pedro Leitão & Gilberto Camara & Adeline Maciel & Patrick Hostert & Ieda Del’Arco Sanches, 2020. "Impacts of Public and Private Sector Policies on Soybean and Pasture Expansion in Mato Grosso—Brazil from 2001 to 2017," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Antoci, Angelo & Iannucci, Gianluca & Rocchi, Benedetto & Ticci, Elisa, 2023. "The land allocation game: Externalities and evolutionary competition," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 124-133.
    9. Claudio Rafael Mariano Baigún & Priscilla Gail Minotti, 2021. "Conserving the Paraguay-Paraná Fluvial Corridor in the XXI Century: Conflicts, Threats, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Toloi, Rodrigo Carlo & Reis, João Gilberto Mendes dos & Toloi, Marley Nunes Vituri & Vendrametto, Oduvaldo & Cabral, José António Sarsfield Pereira, 2022. "Applying analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to identify decision-making in soybean supply chains: a case of Mato Grosso production," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(2), January.
    11. Luiz Antonio Martinelli & Mateus Batistella & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Emilio Moran, 2017. "Soy Expansion and Socioeconomic Development in Municipalities of Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Simone Piras & Valdemar João Wesz & Stefano Ghinoi, 2021. "Soy Expansion, Environment, and Human Development: An Analysis across Brazilian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Kmoch, Laura, 2021. "Neglect paves the way for dispossession: The politics of “last frontiers” in Brazil and Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko Niedbała, 2022. "Prediction of Protein Content in Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Sebastian Kujawa & Gniewko Niedbała, 2021. "Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-6, May.
    17. Peter Richards, 2018. "It’s not just where you farm; it’s whether your neighbor does too. How agglomeration economies are shaping new agricultural landscapes," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 87-110.
    18. Ferreira, Susane Cristini Gomes & Azevedo-Ramos, Claudia & Farias, Hilder André Bezerra & Mota, Pedro, 2023. "Spillover effect of the oil palm boom on the growth of surrounding towns in the eastern Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Stabile, Marcelo C.C. & Guimarães, André L. & Silva, Daniel S. & Ribeiro, Vivian & Macedo, Marcia N. & Coe, Michael T. & Pinto, Erika & Moutinho, Paulo & Alencar, Ane, 2020. "Solving Brazil's land use puzzle: Increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Lamichhane, Sabhyata & Mei, Bin & Siry, Jacek, 2023. "Forecasting pine sawtimber stumpage prices: A comparison between a time series hybrid model and an artificial neural network," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:11:p:1164-:d:682373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.