IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i8p179-d1457522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Framework for Unlocking Customer Satisfaction Drivers in Digital Vendor-Managed Inventory Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Aihie Osarenkhoe

    (Department of Business and Economic Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Daniella Fjellström

    (Department of Business and Economic Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Tove Gioeli

    (Department of Business and Economic Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Anna Backer-Meurke

    (Department of Business and Economic Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

Abstract

There are calls in the extant literature for further exploration into the factors influencing customer satisfaction in industrial vending solutions (IVS), a distinct vendor-managed inventory method. This study delves into these factors, identifying primary drivers of satisfaction, perceptions of service quality, and indicators of trust and commitment in B2B IVS. It examines how IVS execution impacts perceived service quality through in-depth semi-structured interviews with B2B customers, focusing on efficiency, user-friendliness, and timeliness as key satisfaction drivers. Trust in the customer–supplier relationship positively affects commitment to the supplier. Successful IVS implementation enhances inventory control, customer service, and cost management. Supply chain managers can use these insights to evaluate vending solutions. Future research could explore supplier perceptions of vendor-managed inventory (VMI) success and conduct larger quantitative studies. This study distinguishes itself by focusing on the primary drivers of customer satisfaction and the perception of service quality in B2B IVS environments. It offers a conceptual framework for managing customer satisfaction, product development, and marketing strategies in IVS, addressing a gap in the literature on IVS within VMI contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihie Osarenkhoe & Daniella Fjellström & Tove Gioeli & Anna Backer-Meurke, 2024. "Conceptual Framework for Unlocking Customer Satisfaction Drivers in Digital Vendor-Managed Inventory Systems," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:179-:d:1457522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/8/179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/8/179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dae Ryong Kim & Myun Joong Chen & Milam Aiken, 2005. "Towards an understanding of the relationship between IS outsourcing vendors' service quality and outsourcing effects," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 12-24.
    2. Arne Katzmarzik, 2011. "Product Differentiation for Software-as-a-Service Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(1), pages 19-31, February.
    3. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Narcyz Roztocki & Heinz Roland Weistroffer, 2015. "Investments in enterprise integration technology: An event study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 659-672, June.
    3. Hüseyin Tanriverdi & Arun Rai & N. Venkatraman, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 822-834, December.
    4. S Sivadasan & J Smart & L Huaccho Huatuco & A Calinescu, 2010. "Operational complexity and supplier–customer integration: case study insights and complexity rebound," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(12), pages 1709-1718, December.
    5. Chaitanya Sambhara & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2022. "Configuring the Enterprise Systems Portfolio: The Role of Information Risk," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 446-463, June.
    6. Nicholas Berente & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo & John Leslie King, 2016. "Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 551-572, June.
    7. Xin Chen & Qizhi Dai & Chaohong Na, 2019. "The value of enterprise information systems under different corporate governance aspects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 223-247, December.
    8. Ning Jia & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2020. "Reducing Capital Market Anomaly: The Role of Information Technology Using an Information Uncertainty Lens," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 979-1001, February.
    9. Francesco Rizzi & Irene Bartolozzi & Alessandra Borghini & Marco Frey, 2013. "Environmental Management of End‐of‐Life Products: Nine Factors of Sustainability in Collaborative Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 561-572, December.
    10. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Wuest, Thorsten & Stahre, Johan, 2020. "Smart Maintenance: an empirically grounded conceptualization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Norshidah Mohamed & Batiah Mahadi & Suraya Miskon & Hanif Haghshenas, 2023. "Determinants and Influences of Information Systems Integration in a Public Higher Education Context," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Hanqing “Chevy” Fang & Esra Memili & James J. Chrisman & Linjia Tang, 2021. "Narrow‐Framing and Risk Preferences in Family and Non‐Family Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 201-235, January.
    13. Teresa Tiaojung Hsu & Kuen-Hung Tsai & Yi-Chuan Liao, 2013. "How Knowledge Integration Mechanisms Affect Product Innovation in the NPD Process?," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    14. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G., 2018. "Organizational improvisation and the reduced usefulness of performance measurement BI functionalities," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Bernroider, Edward W.N., 2015. "The performance of contingencies of supply chain information integration: The roles of product and market complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-11.
    16. C. Ranganathan & Carol V. Brown, 2006. "ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 145-161, June.
    17. Raymond F. Zammuto & Terri L. Griffith & Ann Majchrzak & Deborah J. Dougherty & Samer Faraj, 2007. "Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 749-762, October.
    18. Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Zuoming Liu, 2019. "Aligning governance mechanisms with task features to improve service capabilities---an empirical study of professional service outsourcing in India," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 19-39, June.
    19. Goldsby, Curtis M. & Hanisch, Marvin, 2023. "Agency in the algorithmic age: The mechanisms and structures of blockchain-based organizing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Andrea Masini & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "ERP Competence-Building Mechanisms: An Exploratory Investigation of Configurations of ERP Adopters in the European and U.S. Manufacturing Sectors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 274-298, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:179-:d:1457522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.