IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i12p339-d1547276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary Social Disclosure in an Emerging Country: The Case of Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • José Vale

    (CEOS.PP—Centre for Organisational and Social Studies of Polytechnic of Porto, Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, 4465-004 Matosinhos, Portugal)

  • Ana Santos

    (Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, 4465-004 Matosinhos, Portugal)

  • Maria C. Tavares

    (GOVCOPP—Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Higher Institute for Accountancy and Administration of University of Aveiro (ISCA-UA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Rui Bertuzi

    (CEOS.PP—Centre for Organisational and Social Studies of Polytechnic of Porto, Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, 4465-004 Matosinhos, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aims to assess the disclosure extent and quality, as well as the percentage of audited reports, of the Brazilian companies listed on the IBOVESPA stock exchange index and explore some factors that influence disclosure quality. A content analysis of 71 annual sustainability (or similar) and integrated reports was conducted, focused on the social dimension. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the disclosure quality index and being audited by a Big Four company, the number of members on the board of directors, the use of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards in the preparation of the reports, and the type of industry. The results suggest that although the disclosure extent is reasonable, its quality is poor. In addition, considering its voluntary nature, the disclosure-auditing index is deemed satisfactory. The results also suggest that the disclosure quality of Brazilian companies is positively and significantly influenced by being audited by a Big Four company, by adopting the GRI standards, by the number of members composing the board of directors, and by belonging to the “Energy and utility” industry. This study contributes to the extant literature by assessing the disclosure extent and quality and the percentage of audited reports of companies in an emerging economy setting—Brazil—and exploring some factors which influence the disclosure quality in emerging countries’ companies, such as auditing by a Big Four company, which has thus far been unexplored. It also contributes to increasing the awareness of the theme among managers.

Suggested Citation

  • José Vale & Ana Santos & Maria C. Tavares & Rui Bertuzi, 2024. "Voluntary Social Disclosure in an Emerging Country: The Case of Brazil," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:339-:d:1547276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/12/339/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/12/339/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Perego & Ans Kolk, 2012. "Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 173-190, October.
    2. van Staden, Chris J. & Hooks, Jill, 2007. "A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 197-210.
    3. Kwasi Dartey-Baah & George Kofi Amoako, 2021. "A review of empirical research on corporate social responsibility in emerging economies," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(7), pages 1330-1347, July.
    4. Justin Stevenson & Maryam Safari & Huan Vo-Tran & Naomi Whiteside, 2024. "Utilisation of voluntary disclosure via social media as a strategic response to COVID-19," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 555-585, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marileena Koskela & Jarmo Vehmas, 2012. "Defining Eco‐efficiency: A Case Study on the Finnish Forest Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 546-566, December.
    2. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Hina Ismail & Muhammad A. Saleem & Sadaf Zahra & Muhammad S. Tufail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Heejung Byun & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Identity Claims and Diffusion of Sustainability Report: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies, 2003–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 551-565, February.
    6. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2017. "Does Size Matter? Evaluating Corporate Environmental Disclosure in the Australian Mining and Metal Industry: A Combined Approach of Quantity and Quality Measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 209-223, February.
    7. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    8. Tiffany Cheng-Han Leung & Robin Stanley Snell, 2021. "Strategies for Social and Environmental Disclosure: The Case of Multinational Gambling Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 447-467, January.
    9. Bouten, Lies & Everaert, Patricia & Van Liedekerke, Luc & De Moor, Lieven & Christiaens, Johan, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 187-204.
    10. Axel Haller & Chris J. van Staden & Cristina Landis, 2018. "Value Added as part of Sustainability Reporting: Reporting on Distributional Fairness or Obfuscation?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 763-781, October.
    11. Kılıç, Merve & Kuzey, Cemil & Uyar, Ali, 2021. "An international investigation on assurance of integrated reports: Institutions, assurance quality, and assurers," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    12. Shan Zhou & Roger Simnett & Wendy Green, 2017. "Does Integrated Reporting Matter to the Capital Market?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 94-132, March.
    13. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Mumtaheena Anwar & Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nurul Kabir, 2021. "Does national carbon pricing policy affect voluntary environmental disclosures? A global evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 211-244, April.
    15. repec:ehu:cuader:55446 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    17. Lisa D. Lewin & Danielle E. Warren, 2024. "Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Beck, A. Cornelia & Campbell, David & Shrives, Philip J., 2010. "Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 207-222.
    19. Xiuhong Xia & Sifan Gao & Hanlu Cheng, 2024. "What Gets Measured, Gets Managed: The Role of Sustainability Assurance in Green Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Orazalin, Nurlan & Uyar, Ali & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    21. Font, Xavier & Walmsley, Andreas & Cogotti, Sara & McCombes, Lucy & Häusler, Nicole, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility: The disclosure–performance gap," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1544-1553.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:339-:d:1547276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.