IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i10p266-d1502799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Entrepreneurial Impact of the European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Dempere

    (Higher Colleges of Technology, Al-Ain Abu Dhabi 25026, United Arab Emirates)

  • Eseroghene Udjo

    (Higher Colleges of Technology, Al-Ain Abu Dhabi 25026, United Arab Emirates)

  • Paulo Mattos

    (Higher Colleges of Technology, Al-Ain Abu Dhabi 25026, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The European Commission’s Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, adopted in 2022 and approved in 2024, mandates that companies identify, prevent, and mitigate hostile human rights and environmental impacts across their operations and supply chains, integrating sustainability into corporate governance. This article examines the directive’s influence on European entrepreneurial activity, ecosystems, and innovation using a qualitative descriptive literature analysis, comparative frameworks, impact assessments, policy recommendations, and case studies. Findings suggest that while the directive imposes compliance challenges and costs, particularly for startups and small and medium-sized enterprises, it offers significant long-term benefits, such as improved risk management, enhanced reputation, and market differentiation. The directive promotes accountability and ethical practices, harmonizing due diligence across the EU and fostering a culture of sustainability. It concludes that companies addressing these impacts can gain a competitive edge and attract sustainability-focused investors, necessitating support mechanisms for startups and small and medium-sized enterprises to mitigate burdens and encourage compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Dempere & Eseroghene Udjo & Paulo Mattos, 2024. "The Entrepreneurial Impact of the European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:266-:d:1502799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/266/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/266/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2012. "What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(9), pages 834-864, December.
    2. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    2. Ferrell, Allen & Liang, Hao & Renneboog, Luc, 2016. "Socially responsible firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 585-606.
    3. Feng, Jingwen & Goodell, John W. & Shen, Dehua, 2022. "ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    4. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Alice Medioli & Pier Luigi Marchini & Tatiana Mazza, 2024. "The impact of corruption and public governance quality on family firm business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 55-69, January.
    6. Eduardo Ortas & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & Igor Álvarez, 2019. "National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms' environmental, social, and governance performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 598-611, May.
    7. Anthony Goerzen & Michael Sartor & Kristin Brandl & Stacey Fitzsimmons, 2023. "Widening the lens: Multilevel drivers of firm corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 42-60, February.
    8. Bu, Maoliang & Xu, Liang & Tang, Ryan W., 2023. "MNEs’ transfer of socially irresponsible practices: A replication with new extensions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    9. Joel Bothello & Ioannis Ioannou & Vlad‐Andrei Porumb & Yasemin Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, 2023. "CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3217-3251, December.
    10. David Bendig & Andreas Wagner & Kevin Lau, 2023. "Does it pay to be science‐based green? The impact of science‐based emission‐reduction targets on corporate financial performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 125-140, February.
    11. Arouri, Mohamed & Gomes, Mathieu & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and M&A uncertainty," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 176-198.
    12. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2021. "Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Yang Stephanie Liu & Khaldoon Albitar, 2024. "Driving businesses towards a better climate: Macro and micro mechanisms to protect the planet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1810-1833, March.
    14. Geert Braam & Erik Poutsma & Roel Schouteten & Beatrice van der Heijden, 2024. "Employee financial participation and corporate social and environmental performance: Evidence from European panel data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 381-409, June.
    15. Johan Graafland & Niels Noorderhaven, 2020. "Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(6), pages 1034-1043, August.
    16. Muhammad Ali & Mirit K Grabarski & Sana Ahmed & Nazish Imtiaz, 2024. "Does leadership gender diversity drive corporate social responsibility and organizational outcomes? The role of organization size," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(3), pages 319-339, August.
    17. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    18. Olaf Weber & Grace Saunders‐Hogberg, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, water management, and financial performance in the food and beverage industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1937-1946, July.
    19. Dang, Rey & Houanti, L'Hocine & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Simioni, Michel, 2021. "Do women on corporate boards influence corporate social performance? A control function approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    20. Tobias Steindl, 2021. "Cultural rule orientation, legal institutions, and the credibility of corporate social responsibility reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 310-332, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:266-:d:1502799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.