IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i12p246-d1288441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Dark Side of Leadership in the University System Using Community of Practice (CoP) Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bunmi Isaiah Omodan

    (Faculty of Education, Walter Sisulu University, Butterworth 4960, South Africa)

Abstract

University systems are increasingly facing the consequences of the dark side of leadership. The dark side of leadership in educational organisations is a worldwide phenomenon affecting universities, academies, and college campuses. To respond to this, this paper explores the potential of community practice as an approach to respond to the dark side of leadership in the university system. The paper is a conceptual argument and derives knowledge from argumentative and logical reasoning, located within an interpretive worldview and analysed using conceptual analysis as a tool to make sense of the arguments. The paper argues that shared commonality, collective problem solving, mutual participation, and social interactions are dimensions of remedy that can ameliorate the dark side of leadership. Based on this argument, the paper concludes that effective dimensions of remedy that could ameliorate the dark side of leadership in university contexts are shared commonality, collective problem solving, mutual participation, and social interactions, with a recommendation that they must be incorporated in university leadership dispositions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bunmi Isaiah Omodan, 2023. "Addressing the Dark Side of Leadership in the University System Using Community of Practice (CoP) Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:246-:d:1288441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/12/246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    2. Keuschnigg, Marc & Schikora, Jan, 2014. "The Dark Side of Leadership: An Experiment on Religious Heterogeneity and Cooperation in India," MPRA Paper 57533, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Patrick D Brandt & Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis & Tracey Baas & Amanda F Bolgioni & Janet Alder & Kimberly A Petrie & Isabel Dominguez & Abigail M Brown & C Abigail Stayart & Harinder Singh & Audra Va, 2021. "A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2022. "The effect of cultural values on the strength of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational workplace deviance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 760-771.
    2. Can He & Jie Xiong & Yue Zhang & Haiyuan Dou & Jiahui Du, 2023. "Destructive Leadership and Turnover Intention among Chinese Rural Kindergarten Teachers: The Mediation of Ego Depletion and the Moderation of Kindergarten Affiliation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Fijnanda van Klingeren & Nan Dirk de Graaf, 2021. "Heterogeneity, trust and common-pool resource management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 37-64, March.
    4. Nilupulee Liyanagamage & Mario Fernando & Belinda Gibbons, 2023. "The Emotional Machiavellian: Interactions Between Leaders and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 657-673, September.
    5. Sriya Iyer, 2016. "The New Economics of Religion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 395-441, June.
    6. Malte Müller & Jens Rommel & Christian Kimmich, 2018. "Farmers’ Adoption of Irrigation Technologies: Experimental Evidence from a Coordination Game with Positive Network Externalities in India," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 19(2), pages 119-139, May.
    7. repec:zib:zbmbmj:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:53-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Peikai Li & Kui Yin & Jian Shi & Tom G. E. Damen & Toon W. Taris, 2024. "Are Bad Leaders Indeed Bad for Employees? A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Between Destructive Leadership and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 399-413, May.
    9. Anastasia Danilov & Ju Yeong Hong & Anja Schöttner, 2024. "Strategic Use of Unfriendly Leadership and Labor Market Competition: An Experimental Analysis," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 507, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    10. Béatrice Boulu-Reshef & Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, 2019. "Social Distance and Parochial Altruism: An Experimental Study," Working Papers hal-02135633, HAL.
    11. Lin, Chiou-Shiu & Jin, Ming & Huang, Pei-Chi & Xiao, Ran, 2023. "Does it take two to tango? The joint role of high-performance work systems and ethical leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Billinger, Stephan & Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark, 2023. "On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Sharfa Hassan & Puneet Kaur & Michael Muchiri & Chidiebere Ogbonnaya & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "Unethical Leadership: Review, Synthesis and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 511-550, March.
    14. Anastasia Danilov & Ju Yeong Hong & Anja Schöttner, 2024. "Strategic Use of Unfriendly Leadership and Labor Market Competition: An Experimental Analysis," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0042, Berlin School of Economics.
    15. Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Raymond Kwong & Macy Wong & Jinyun Duan, 2023. "Great leaders do everything: a moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, trust in leader, helping behaviour, and idiosyncratic deals," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 549-569, April.
    16. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Alexander, Katherine C. & Mackey, Jeremy D. & Maher, Liam P. & McAllister, Charn P. & Ellen, B. Parker, 2024. "An implicit leadership theory examination of cultural values as moderators of the relationship between destructive leadership and followers’ task performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    18. Marcus Munafò, 2021. "Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-3, July.
    19. Billinger, Stephan & Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark, 2019. "Discretionary mechanisms and cooperation in hierarchies: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Jing Yu & Martin G. Kocher, 2023. "Leading by example in a public goods experiment with benefit heterogeneity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 685-712, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:246-:d:1288441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.