IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v10y2020i2p26-d350789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Tolkki

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland)

  • Arto Haveri

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

Due to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state control and metropolitan governance capacity based on a comparative case study of four metropolitan areas: Auckland, Dublin, Montreal and Oslo. These areas represent different models of metropolitan governance, as well as different forms of state control. We studied state control by focusing on political and administrative decentralization: how independently can the metropolitan government make decisions and perform its tasks? The conclusion is that the different dimensions of decentralization are connected to capacity, but not straightforwardly. This study indicates that state involvement through different forms of control can increase metropolitan governance capacity, but only if it is combined with mandate and supportive policy actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Tolkki & Arto Haveri, 2020. "The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:26-:d:350789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jen Nelles, 2013. "Cooperation and Capacity? Exploring the Sources and Limits of City-Region Governance Partnerships," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1349-1367, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Dmytryshyn & Roman Dmytryshyn & Valentyna Yakubiv & Andriy Zagorodnyuk, 2021. "Peculiarities of Ukrainians’ Approval of Decentralization Reform," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Waite & Gillian Bristow, 2019. "Spaces of city-regionalism: Conceptualising pluralism in policymaking," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 689-706, June.
    2. Sungho Park & Craig S. Maher & Carol Ebdon, 2020. "Interlocal Collaboration and Local Fiscal Structure: Do State Incentives Matter?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 20-43, June.
    3. Melanie Bedore, 2014. "The convening power of food as growth machine politics: A study of food policymaking and partnership formation in Baltimore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 2979-2995, November.
    4. Marc Pradel-Miquel, 2015. "Making polycentrism: Governance innovation in small and medium-sized cities in the West Midlands and Barcelona metropolitan regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1753-1768, December.
    5. Melika Levelt & Tamara Metze, 2014. "The legitimacy of regional governance networks: Gaining credibility in the shadow of hierarchy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2371-2386, August.
    6. Ki Woong Cho & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "From Collaborative to Hegemonic Water Resource Governance through Dualism and Jeong : Lessons Learned from the Daegu-Gumi Water Intake Source Conflict in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Dušek Jiří, 2017. "Evaluation of Development of Cooperation in South Bohemian Municipalities in the Years 2007–2014," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 342-358, June.
    8. Niamh Moore-Cherry & Carla Maria Kayanan & John Tomaney & Andy Pike, 2022. "Governing the Metropolis: An International Review of Metropolitanisation, Metropolitan Governance and the Relationship with Sustainable Land Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Rodrigo V. Cardoso & Evert J. Meijers, 2016. "Contrasts between first-tier and second-tier cities in Europe: a functional perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 996-1015, May.
    10. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(5), pages 485-513, October.
    11. Sirkku Juhola, 2013. "Adaptation to Climate Change in the Private and the Third Sector: Case Study of Governance of the Helsinki Metropolitan Region," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(5), pages 911-925, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:26-:d:350789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.