IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fst/rfsisf/v14-special-juney2023i8p23-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsability and value creation in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Olivian Bîltac

    (University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and value creation in Romania. Specifically. This paper aims to identify the key CSR practices that companies in Romania are engaging in, and to explore how these practices are impacting business performance and creating value for stakeholders. By examining the extent to which companies in Romania are embracing CSR and the outcomes they are achieving, this paper will contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of CSR in creating sustainable and socially responsible businesses in Romania. The main tool at the basis of such an analysis is the international GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) – Social indicators reporting, differently approached by different companies within their sustainability reports, collected within a database, converted into comparable information based on a scoring method, as the indicators are either qualitative or quantitative, most of the times very difficult to bring to a common denominator. Such a method we also consider useful in further valuation and ranking. The findings of this paper suggest that corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices are becoming increasingly important for businesses operating in Romania. The analysis reveals that companies in Romania are engaging in a range of CSR practices, including philanthropy, environmental sustainability, and employee welfare, and that these practices are having a positive impact on both business performance and stakeholder perceptions. Specifically, the study finds that companies that engage in CSR are more likely to attract and retain talent, enhance their reputation, and brand value, and generate higher levels of customer loyalty and satisfaction. Moreover, the analysis indicates that CSR practices can also lead to cost savings and improved operational efficiencies, further contributing to value creation. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of CSR as a strategic tool for businesses seeking to create long-term sustainable value in Romania. The Sustainability Disclosure Database provides the existing sustainability reports of major companies in Romania, along recent years. Given such data, these reports have been processed and the information has been tailored into rather homogenous sets, starting with the GRI Standards’ indicators and generating an hierarchy of social activities and their results. We consider such an enterprise necessary if it is aimed at achieving a clear evaluation and identification of company’s both financial and social performance. This paper contributes to the literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and value creation by providing insights into the current state of CSR practices in Romania, a context that has received relatively little attention in the CSR literature. The paper builds on previous studies by focusing specifically on Romania, a transitional economy that has undergone significant political and economic changes in recent years, and by examining the relationship between CSR and value creation in this context. The paper’s findings highlight the importance of CSR for businesses operating in Romania and offer practical insights for companies seeking to implement CSR strategies that create sustainable value for stakeholders. This study also provides a foundation for future research on CSR in Romania and other emerging economies, thereby advancing our understanding of the role of CSR in driving positive social and environmental outcomes while also creating business value.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivian Bîltac, 2023. "Corporate social responsability and value creation in Romania," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 23-44, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:14-special-june:y:2023:i:8:p:23-44
    DOI: 10.55654/JFS.2023.SP.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/2.-Biltac.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revista.isfin.ro/2023/06/25/corporate-social-responsibility-and-value-creation-in-romania/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55654/JFS.2023.SP.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Sanches Garcia & Renato J. Orsato, 2020. "Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3261-3272, December.
    2. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 627-675, September.
    3. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 275-320, October.
    4. Timo Busch & Gunnar Friede, 2018. "The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 583-608, July.
    5. Unggul Purwohedi & Bruce Gurd, 2019. "Using Social Return on Investment (SROI) to measure project impact in local government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 56-63, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:special-june_2023:p:23-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fan, Yiyi & Li, Shanshan & Yang, WenQi, 2024. "The impact of the percentage of female directors on corporate ESG score," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Kunene, Noxolo & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2024. "Renewable energy certificates and firm value: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    5. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "An integrated theory of the firm approach to environmental, social and governance performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1567-1598, April.
    6. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    7. Heidi Reed, 2024. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 435-455, March.
    8. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    9. V. Veeravel & E. K. S. Sadharma & Bandi Kamaiah, 2024. "Do ESG disclosures lead to superior firm performance? A method of moments panel quantile regression approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 741-754, January.
    10. David Bendig & Andreas Wagner & Kevin Lau, 2023. "Does it pay to be science‐based green? The impact of science‐based emission‐reduction targets on corporate financial performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 125-140, February.
    11. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Anrong Gao & Tianren Xiong & Yuxi Luo & Defeng Meng, 2023. "Promote or Crowd Out? The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure Methods on Enterprise Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Stephanie Schrage & Michael Behnam, 2024. "Advancing the Moral legitimacy of digital platforms as gatekeepers: a critical analysis from a political corporate social responsibility perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1115-1145, October.
    14. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino & Antonello Garzoni, 2019. "How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1591-1606, November.
    15. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    16. Zeeshan Mukhtar & Abdul Rasheed, 2024. "Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure Effect on Corporate Social Performance: Evidence from Non-Financial Industries of Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 527-541.
    17. Marius Banke & Stephanie Lenger & Christiane Pott, 2022. "ESG Ratings in the Corporate Reporting of DAX40 Companies in Germany: Effects on Market Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Jukka Mähönen, 2020. "Comprehensive Approach to Relevant and Reliable Reporting in Europe: A Dream Impossible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-38, June.
    19. Zaheer Alam & Yasir Bin Tariq, 2023. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Evaluation and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    20. Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli & Antonietta Cosentino & Mara Del Baldo & Angela Magistro, 2021. "Theory of the Firm and Integrated Reporting Model: First Essay from NIBR Guidelines for SMES in Italy," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(6), pages 1-84, July.
    21. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • G39 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:14-special-june:y:2023:i:8:p:23-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isfinro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.