IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedker/y1997iqiiip55-76nv.82no.3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the depository industry in Tenth District states

Author

Listed:
  • William R. Keeton
  • Anne D. McKibbin

Abstract

Recent development in Congress and the courts have focused attention on the relative roles of commercial banks, thrifts, and credit unions. As concern mounted last year about the state of the thrift deposit insurance fund, Congress required commercial banks to share the burden of recapitalizing the fund. In return, Congress promised to come up with a plan for merging the bank and thrift charters, a move the banking industry has long favored. About the same time, a federal appeals court ruled against a major source of credit union growth since the early 1980s - the acceptance of new members with a common bond different from the original members. The Supreme Court later agreed to hear the case, sparking a renewed debate in Congress about the proper role of credit unions in the financial system. ; These recent actions by Congress and the courts follow a decade and a half of dramatic changes in the depository industry in Tenth District states. Some of these changes have been due to shifts in laws and regulations. First, there has been a significant decline in the number of district depository institutions - a decline in which banks, thrifts, and credit unions have all shared. Second, total deposits have declined when adjusted for inflation or measured relative to economic activity. Third, the share of thrifts in total deposits has plummeted relative to that of banks and credit unions. And fourth, while banks, thrifts, and credit unions still specialize in different loans and investments, the three types of institutions do not look as different today as at the beginning of the 1980s. ; Such changes are important because they affect the thousands of depository institutions in the district and the supply of credit and other financial services to district households and businesses. With those effects in mind, Keeton and McKibbin show how the district depository industry has changed since 1979, explain the factors behind each change, and suggest what further changes may lie ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • William R. Keeton & Anne D. McKibbin, 1997. "Changes in the depository industry in Tenth District states," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 82(Q III), pages 55-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:y:1997:i:qiii:p:55-76:n:v.82no.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/992/1997-Changes%20in%20the%20Depository%20Industry%20in%20Tenth%20District%20States.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Eisenbeis & Myron L. Kwast, 1989. "Are real estate specializing depositories viable? The evidence from commercial banks," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 88, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Carter H. Golembe, 1994. "The (declining?) role of banking," Proceedings 14, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. Dean F. Amel, 1996. "Trends in the structure of federally insured depository institutions, 1984-94," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), vol. 82(Jan), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Donald P. Morgan, 1994. "Will the shift to stocks and bonds by households be destabilizing?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 79(Q II), pages 31-44.
    5. Elizabeth Laderman, 1997. "Deposits and demographics?," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue jun27.
    6. Robert E. Litan, 1994. "The relative decline of banking: should we care?," Proceedings 16, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William R. Keeton, 1998. "Are rural banks facing increased funding pressures? : evidence from Tenth District states," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 83(Q II), pages 43-67.
    2. Talla M Aldeehani, 2016. "Has the risk index of Islamic banks and conventional banks in GCC countries changed in response to the 2008 economic crisis?," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 4(4), pages 20-33, August.
    3. John V. Duca, 2005. "Why Have U.S. Households Increasingly Relied On Mutual Funds To Own Equity?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 51(3), pages 375-396, September.
    4. Elyas Elyasiani & Iqbal Mansur & Jill Wetmore, 2010. "Real-Estate Risk Effects on Financial Institutions’ Stock Return Distribution: a Bivariate GARCH Analysis," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 89-107, January.
    5. Frank Ametefe & A.Q.Q. Aboagye & E. Sarpong‐Kumankoma, 2010. "Housing and construction finance, deposit mobilisation and bank performance in Ghana," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 151-165, June.
    6. Ling He & Alan Reichert, 2003. "Time variation paths of factors affecting financial institutions and stock returns," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 31(1), pages 71-86, March.
    7. Duca, John V., 2006. "Mutual funds and the evolving long-run effects of stock wealth on U.S. consumption," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 202-221.
    8. Franklin Edwards & Xin Zhang, 1998. "Mutual Funds and Stock and Bond Market Stability," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 13(3), pages 257-282, June.
    9. Eric Dei Ofosu-Hene & Peter Amoh, 2016. "Risk Management and Performance of Listed Banks in Ghana," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 2(2), pages 107-121.
    10. Eisenbeis, Robert A & Horvitz, Paul M & Cole, Rebel A, 1996. "Commercial Banks and Real Estate Lending: The Texas Experience," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 275-290, November.
    11. Ralph C. Kimball, 1997. "Specialization, risk, and capital in banking," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Nov, pages 51-73.
    12. Hasan, Iftekhar & Hasan, Tanweer & Pickeral, Robert, 1995. "Are mortgage specialized thrifts viable? an empirical investigation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 189-204.
    13. Tran, Dung Viet & Ho, Sy-Hoa, 2019. "Does diversification affect the quality of loan portfolio?Panel Granger-causality evidence from US banks," MPRA Paper 98186, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. James W. Kolari & Charles C. Ou & G. Hwan Shin, 2006. "Assessing the Profitability and Riskiness of Small Business Lenders in the Banking Industry," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, Summer.
    15. M. Cary Collins & Van Son Lai & James E. McNulty, 1997. "Thrifty Viability and Traditional Mortgage Lending: A Simultaneous Equations Analysis of the Risk-Return Trade-Off," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 13(2), pages 155-176.
    16. Shobhit Goel & Pawan Kumar, 2024. "Indian Mutual Fund Industry: Is 2014 A Turning Point?," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 27(3), pages 527-556, July.
    17. Elona Dushku & Antje Hildebrandt & Erjona Suljoti, 2019. "The impact of housing markets on banks’ risk-taking behavior: evidence from CESEE," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/19, pages 55-75.
    18. Lucia Gibilaro & Gianluca Mattarocci, 2016. "Are Real Estate Banks More Affected by Real Estate Market Dynamics?," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 151-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:y:1997:i:qiii:p:55-76:n:v.82no.3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zach Kastens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbkcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.