IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/far/spaeco/y2019i1p84-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asian-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Vladimirovich Tomilov

    (Economic Research Institute FEB RAS)

Abstract

The article describes the potential free trade zones in Asia-Pacific: Trans-Pacific Partnership, Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership, Free Trade Zone of Asia-Pacific. Literary sources used by the researchers allowed concluding that the efficiency of integration groups depends on participants’ composition and the level of their trade and economical development. The more heterogeneous trade union participants, the less effective its development. In this article economic proximity and trade interactions intensity are the main factors for choosing integration groups participants. The research goal is to assess the integration potential of mentioned free trade zones in Asia-Pacific. In order to achieve this goal the calculation of participating countries economic proximity and their trade interactions intensity is made by means of econometric and mathematical methods. As a result, Trans-Pacific Partnership which has already been cancelled because of Washington’s withdrawal turned out to be a free trade zone with the biggest integration potential. The results demonstrate the significant gap between the rest of the integration groups and the leader. It is likely to be explained either by incomplete level of integration cooperation for creating sufficient integration group providing positive trade and economical effects or by the absence of such forms of integration cooperation in Asia-Pacific, which let countries receive abovementioned effects. In addition the hypothetical zone of countries with the highest potential integration effects is identified within the premises considered in the article. It consists of 16 countries and demonstrates the highest level of economical proximity

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Vladimirovich Tomilov, 2019. "Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asian-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 84-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2019:i:1:p:84-106
    DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.084-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2019_1/SE.2019.1.084-106.Tomilov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://spatial-economics.com/eng/arkhiv-nomerov/2019/101-2019-1/903-SE-2019-1-84-106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14530/se.2019.1.084-106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony J. Venables, 2003. "Winners and losers from regional integration agreements," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(490), pages 747-761, October.
    2. Duong Tran & Adam Heal, 2014. "A Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific: Potential Pathways to Implementation," Trade Insights Series 4, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    3. Pravin Krishna, 2003. "Are Regional Trading Partners "Natural"?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(1), pages 202-231, February.
    4. Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs & Jeffrey J. Schott, 2016. "Trans-Pacific Partnership: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 7137.
    5. Jeffrey J. Schott & Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs & Euijin Jung, 2016. "Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for the World Trading System," Policy Briefs PB16-8, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir & Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev & Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko & Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo, 2020. "Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or a Political Geographic Rationale? Far Eastern Russia Case," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 66-99.
    2. P. A. Minakir & A. G. Isaev & A. N. Dem’yanenko & O. M. Prokapalo, 2020. "Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or Political–Geographical Expediency? The Case of the Far East," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 327-343, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yana Valeryevna Dyomina, 2020. "Multilateral and Bilateral Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 3, pages 156-180.
    2. Ya. V. Demina, 2021. "Formats for Multilateral and Bilateral Economic Cooperation in Northeast Asia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 244-253, April.
    3. Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2008. "Quo Vadis Southeast Europe? EU Accession, Regional Cooperation and the need for a Balkan Development Strategy," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 10, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    4. Islam, Sulequl, 2003. "Expansions of the European Union and the NAFTA: Implications for New and Non-Member countries," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 3(2).
    5. Pedro Moncarz & Marcelo Olarreaga & Marcel Vaillant, 2016. "Regionalism as Industrial Policy: Evidence from MERCOSUR," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 359-373, February.
    6. Sarah Ellis Barnekow & Kishore G. Kulkarni, 2017. "Why Regionalism? A Look at the Costs and Benefits of Regional Trade Agreements in Africa," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 99-117, February.
    7. Ken Itakura & Hiro Lee, 2023. "Should the United States rejoin the Trans-Pacific trade deal?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 235-255, May.
    8. Mr. Meredith A McIntyre, 2005. "Trade Integration in the East African Community: An Assessment for Kenya," IMF Working Papers 2005/143, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Maria V. Sokolova, 2016. "Trade Re(Im)Balanced: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements," IHEID Working Papers 06-2016, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    10. J. Vernon Henderson, Zmarak Shalizi, and Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "Geography and development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 81-105, January.
    11. Fugazza, Marco & Robert-Nicoud, Frédéric, 2006. "Can South-South trade Liberalisation Stimulate North-South Trade ?," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 21, pages 234-253.
    12. Jaime MELO DE, 2005. "Regionalism and Developing Countries: A Primer," Working Papers 200510, CERDI.
    13. Jaime DE MELO & Yvonne TSIKATA, 2014. "Regional integration in Africa: Challenges and prospects," Working Papers P93, FERDI.
    14. Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2016. "From an Eroding Model to Questioned Trade Relationships: The European Union and Sub-Saharan Africa," Insight on Africa, , vol. 8(2), pages 81-95, July.
    15. Viral V. Acharya, 2003. "Is the International Convergence of Capital Adequacy Regulation Desirable?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(6), pages 2745-2782, December.
    16. Lee, Hiro & Itakura, Ken, 2018. "The welfare and sectoral adjustment effects of mega-regional trade agreements on ASEAN countries," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 20-32.
    17. Lewis Evans, 2004. "The efficiency test under competition law and regulation in the small distant open economy that is New Zealand," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 241-264.
    18. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18958 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Sánchez-Martín, Miguel Eduardo & de Arce, Rafael & Escribano, Gonzalo, 2014. "Do changes in the rules of the game affect FDI flows in Latin America? A look at the macroeconomic, institutional and regional integration determinants of FDI," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 279-299.
    20. Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Meixing Dai & Claire Mainguy & Jamel Saadaoui & Moïse Sidiropoulos & Isabelle Terraz & Jamel Trabelsi, 2021. "Towards a more resilient European Union after the COVID-19 crisis," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 321-348, June.
    21. Langhammer, Rolf J., 2009. "Learning from Europe’s Efforts at Integration and Convergence: Lessons for Developing Countries’ Integration Policies," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 28925, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    integration potential; economic integration; Asia-Pacific; free trade zone; regional trade; Trans-Pacific Partnership; Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership; Free Trade Zone of Asia-Pacific;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2019:i:1:p:84-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sergey Rogov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecrinru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.