IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v10y2020i3d10.1134_s2079970520030107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or Political–Geographical Expediency? The Case of the Far East

Author

Listed:
  • P. A. Minakir

    (Institute of Economic Research, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • A. G. Isaev

    (Institute of Economic Research, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • A. N. Dem’yanenko

    (Institute of Economic Research, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • O. M. Prokapalo

    (Institute of Economic Research, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The division of Russia’s economic space into macroregions is presented in the Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation as one of the main fragments of the policy for mobilizing the spatial factor of national economic development. This article considers the general problem of economic zoning as a means of formalizing the structure of the national economic space and the allocating interacting territorial fragments within its borders. It is shown that in the presence of canonical solutions to the problem of spatial partitioning at the theoretical level (for example, W. Christaller’s hexagons) there is no empirical solution that is universal for all types of spaces and for all time periods. It is noted that in Russia, the Soviet Union, and the Russian Federation, the task of determining the optimal network of economic regions has always been and still a key issue. This is evidenced by the recently approved Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation. One fundamental feature of the problem of determining the optimal network of regions due to the large scale of the geographic space and exceptional heterogeneity and high degree of polarization of the economic space is multilevel economic zoning. A special place in the system of economic regions belongs to macroregions. The authors consider the criteria for distinguishing large economic regions. They analyze the validity of identifying of the Far Eastern Economic Macroregion defined in the Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation (formed by including Zabaykalsky krai and the Republic of Buryatia in the Far Eastern Federal District) among 12 macroregions in the country. This article analyzes the theoretical and empirical foundations of macroeconomic zoning at the present stage. Particular emphasis is placed on determining the configuration of market zones of federal subjects. It is shown that neither the macroregion that existed in the Far Eastern Federal District, nor the one formed in November 2018, meets the economic criteria for dividing the economic space. Both of them represent a more chaotic set of multidirectional market zones, rather than a relatively uniform economic landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • P. A. Minakir & A. G. Isaev & A. N. Dem’yanenko & O. M. Prokapalo, 2020. "Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or Political–Geographical Expediency? The Case of the Far East," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 327-343, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:10:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1134_s2079970520030107
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970520030107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970520030107
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970520030107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo & Artem Gennadyevich Isaev & Marina Gamilovna Mazitova, 2015. "Economic Situation in the Far Eastern Federal District in 2014," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 132-164.
    2. Mikhail Vladimirovich Tomilov, 2019. "Configuration of Free Trade Zones in the Asian-Pacific Region: Comparison of Integration Potentials," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 84-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dubrovskaya, Yu. & Belonogov, Yu. & Kozonogova, E., 2023. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of administrative-territorial transformations in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 89-108.
    2. N. G. Dzhurka, 2024. "Interregional Economic Interactions in Light of the Central Place Theory," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 126-142, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir & Artyom Gennadyevich Isaev & Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko & Olga Mikhailovna Prokapalo, 2020. "Economic Macroregions: An Integration Phenomenon or a Political Geographic Rationale? Far Eastern Russia Case," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 66-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:10:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1134_s2079970520030107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.