IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/steste/vhtml10.3280-ste2016-118017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisi socio-economica degli accessi ripetuti al pronto soccorso pediatrico: il caso dell?Istituto G. Gaslini di Genova

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Di Bella
  • Lucia Fontana
  • Lucia Leporatti
  • Marcello Montefiori
  • Paolo Petralia

Abstract

The use of Emergency Departments (EDs) is continuously increasing and the challenge of guaranteeing an efficient and effective service is threatened by the phenomena of inappropriate and frequent use. Most of the literature on the topic focuses on adult population; in this study we analyse the issue of frequent use of ED among paediatric patients, with the aim of detecting the most significant socio-demographic and clinical predictors of frequent use of emergency services. Results, based on data collected from the ED of one of the most important paediatric Italian Hospital, show that children aged less than 12 months, foreign and chronic patients (particularly those suffering from mental illness, respiratory diseases and circulatory system problems) have a higher risk of becoming frequent and highly frequent ED users. It emerges that frequent users, although they only represent the 8% of total number of accesses, they account for 19% of total costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Di Bella & Lucia Fontana & Lucia Leporatti & Marcello Montefiori & Paolo Petralia, 2016. "Analisi socio-economica degli accessi ripetuti al pronto soccorso pediatrico: il caso dell?Istituto G. Gaslini di Genova," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(118-119-1), pages 312-327.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2016-118017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=59938&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilbe,Joseph M., 2014. "Modeling Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107611252, January.
    2. Enrico di Bella & Luca Gandullia & Lucia Leporatti & Marcello Montefiori & Patrizia Orcamo, 2018. "Ranking and Prioritization of Emergency Departments Based on Multi-indicator Systems," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 1089-1107, April.
    3. Leporatti, Lucia & Ameri, Marta & Trinchero, Chiara & Orcamo, Patrizia & Montefiori, Marcello, 2016. "Targeting frequent users of emergency departments: Prominent risk factors and policy implications," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 462-470.
    4. Paolo Cremonesi & Enrico Bella & Marcello Montefiori & Luca Persico, 2015. "The Robustness and Effectiveness of the Triage System at Times of Overcrowding and the Extra Costs due to Inappropriate Use of Emergency Departments," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 507-514, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garrafa, Emirena & Levaggi, Rosella & Miniaci, Raffaele & Paolillo, Ciro, 2020. "When fear backfires: Emergency department accesses during the Covid-19 pandemic," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1333-1339.
    2. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    4. Rosella Levaggi & Marcello Montefiori & Luca Persico, 2020. "Speeding up the clinical pathways by accessing emergency departments," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    5. Tiziana Pagnani & Elisabetta Gotor & Enoch Kikulwe & Francesco Caracciolo, 2021. "Livelihood assets’ influence on Ugandan farmers’ control practices for Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW)," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2018. "The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher’s performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1282-1295.
    7. Kimberly S. Weems & Paul J. Smith, 2018. "Assessing the robustness of estimators when fitting Poisson inverse Gaussian models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(8), pages 985-1004, November.
    8. Chiara Bocci & Laura Grassini & Emilia Rocco, 2021. "A multiple inflated negative binomial hurdle regression model: analysis of the Italians’ tourism behaviour during the Great Recession," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1109-1133, October.
    9. Sofia Vaz & Pedro Ramos, 2016. "Where did civil servants go? the effect of an increase in public co-payments on double insured patients," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Chih-Hsing Sam Liu & Jun-You Lin & Sheng-Fang Chou, 2022. "Wielding a double-edged sword? JV investment geographic diversity and parent's innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1783-1816, August.
    11. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Rüdiger Mutz, 2021. "Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Amar Anwar & Ichiro Iwasaki, 2022. "Institutions and FDI from BRICS countries: a meta-analytic review," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 417-468, July.
    13. Maniezzo, Vittorio & Boschetti, Marco A. & Gutjahr, Walter J., 2021. "Stochastic premarshalling of block stacking warehouses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Solymosi, Reka & Petcu, Oana & Wilkinson, Jack, 2020. "Exploring public engagement with missing person appeals on Twitter," SocArXiv wugxs, Center for Open Science.
    15. Aloys Prinz, 2016. "Do capitalistic institutions breed billionaires?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1319-1332, December.
    16. Enrico di Bella & Luca Gandullia & Lucia Leporatti & Marcello Montefiori & Patrizia Orcamo, 2018. "Ranking and Prioritization of Emergency Departments Based on Multi-indicator Systems," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 1089-1107, April.
    17. Christophe Biernacki & Alexandre Lourme, 2019. "Unifying data units and models in (co-)clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 7-31, March.
    18. Geng, Xi & Xia, Aihua, 2022. "When is the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution infinitely divisible?," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    19. Smith, David M. & Faddy, Malcolm J., 2016. "Mean and Variance Modeling of Under- and Overdispersed Count Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i06).
    20. Moritz Berger & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "Transition models for count data: a flexible alternative to fixed distribution models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1259-1283, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • C50 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2016-118017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=59 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.