IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v120y2016i5p462-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Targeting frequent users of emergency departments: Prominent risk factors and policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Leporatti, Lucia
  • Ameri, Marta
  • Trinchero, Chiara
  • Orcamo, Patrizia
  • Montefiori, Marcello

Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics of frequent users of accident and emergency departments (AEDs) and recommends alternative medical services for such patients. Prominent demographic and clinical risk factors for individuals accessing seven AEDs located in the metropolitan area of Genoa, Italy are identified and analysed. A truncated count data model is implemented to establish the determinants of access, while a multinomial logistic regression is used to highlight potential differences among different user categories. According to previous studies, empirical findings suggest that despite the relevance of demographic drivers, vulnerability conditions (e.g. abuse of alcohol and drugs, chronic conditions, and psychological distress) are the main reasons behind frequent AED use; the analysis seems to confirm an association between AED frequent use and lower level of urgency. Since frequent and highly frequent users are found responsible for disproportionate resource absorption with respect to total amount of AED costs (they represent roughly 10% of the total number of patients, but contribute to more than 19% of the total annual AED cost), policies aiming to reduce frequent use of AEDs could bring significant savings in economic resources. Thus, efficient actions could be oriented toward extending primary care services outside AED and toward instituting local aid services specifically addressed to people under the influence of substances or in conditions of mental distress.

Suggested Citation

  • Leporatti, Lucia & Ameri, Marta & Trinchero, Chiara & Orcamo, Patrizia & Montefiori, Marcello, 2016. "Targeting frequent users of emergency departments: Prominent risk factors and policy implications," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 462-470.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:120:y:2016:i:5:p:462-470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851016300501
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Enrico Di Bella & Lucia Fontana & Lucia Leporatti & Marcello Montefiori & Paolo Petralia, 2016. "Analisi socio-economica degli accessi ripetuti al pronto soccorso pediatrico: il caso dell?Istituto G. Gaslini di Genova," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(118-119-1), pages 312-327.
    2. Garrafa, Emirena & Levaggi, Rosella & Miniaci, Raffaele & Paolillo, Ciro, 2020. "When fear backfires: Emergency department accesses during the Covid-19 pandemic," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1333-1339.
    3. Klein, Jens & Koens, Sarah & Scherer, Martin & Strauß, Annette & Härter, Martin & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, 2024. "Variations in the intended utilization of emergency care in case of gastrointestinal diseases," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:120:y:2016:i:5:p:462-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.