IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/spespe/vhtml10.3280-spe2018-002006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why the Keynes-Hayek Macro Debate Cannot be won by either Side

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Patruti

Abstract

The controversy between Keynes and Hayek is one of the most renown in economics. Although it is now almost a century old, it does gather momentum from time to time, especially during periods of crisis when decision-makers are looking for policy solutions. However, in academic writings the actual debate did not and cannot find a common ground. I aim to show in the present article that at the center of the controversy is not a logical fallacy in the theoretical apparatus of either of the two economists, but the empirical premises which they took for granted. While Hayek believed that the market will tend towards equilibrium, and that real life conditions actually approximate this, Keynes considered that the market can be stuck in a partial equilibrium compatible with unemployment. I will further argue that subsequent developments attempt to move the debate in a whole new direction rather than solve this central issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Patruti, 2018. "Why the Keynes-Hayek Macro Debate Cannot be won by either Side," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 113-125.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:spespe:v:html10.3280/spe2018-002006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=63030&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Magliulo, 2016. "Hayek and the Great Depression of 1929: Did he really change his mind?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 31-58, February.
    2. François Facchini, 2016. "The Hayek-Keynes Macro Debate Continues," Post-Print hal-01348748, HAL.
    3. Ahiakpor, James C. W., 2009. "The Phillips Curve Analysis: An Illustration Of The Classical Forced-Saving Doctrine," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 143-160, June.
    4. Facchini François, 2016. "The Hayek-Keynes Macro Debate Continues," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Laidler & Roger Sandilands, 2010. "Harvard, the Chicago Tradition, and the Quantity Theory: A Reply to James Ahiakpor," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 573-592, Fall.
    2. Alexandru Pătruți, 2017. "Are Economic Crises Inherent To Capitalist Evolution?," Review of Social and Economic Issues, Romanian-American University, vol. 1(4), pages 63-73, march.
    3. Kolev, Stefan, 2024. "Governing Dynamics and Superfragility: Liberal Political Economists as Order Guardians," LEF PAPERS on Economy and Society 1-24, Ludwig-Erhard-Forum für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (LEF), Berlin.
    4. Meyer Danie Francois & Chipeta Chama & Camel Richard Thabang Mc, 2018. "An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Interest Rates to Facilitate Price Stability and Economic Growth in South Africa," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 68-90, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • E43 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:spespe:v:html10.3280/spe2018-002006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=121 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.