IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/rissri/vhtml10.3280-riss2019-002005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of parliament in the sustainable development of the country: Agenda for Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Aliya Kassymbek
  • Lazzat Zhazylbek
  • Zhanel Sailibayeva
  • Kairatbek Shadiyev
  • Yermek Buribayev

Abstract

This study is devoted to the impact of Parliament on the sustainable socio-economic, political development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The article addresses the most important issues of sustainable development, the formation and activities of the legislative branch of power, the importance of parliament during the transitional periods of political modernization of Kazakhstan. The authors tried to reveal the political and legal foundations of the functioning of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, to determine the most popular areas of its functioning in modern conditions of accelerating political processes in the country. It is likely that the upsurge in civic activity in Kazakhstan, mass rallies, as well as a change in the thirty-year rule of the first president will put the government in need of transforming the legislative branch of power. Against this background, the underestimation of the social and political significance of parliamentary institutions as one of the decisive conditions for the stable and sustainable development of society and the state stands out. The dependence of the sustainable development of Kazakhstan on the level of development of parliamentary relations seems to be a key point in understanding the essence of the modern political process, its internal determinants, requiring the disclosure of the relationship between elements of civil society and government structures. A comprehensive study of the relationship between socio-political stability and parliamentary institutions contributes to the further development of a scientific theory of the development of the individual, society and the state in the complex and contradictory conditions of the transit of supreme power, which Kazakhstan entered.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliya Kassymbek & Lazzat Zhazylbek & Zhanel Sailibayeva & Kairatbek Shadiyev & Yermek Buribayev, 2019. "The role of parliament in the sustainable development of the country: Agenda for Kazakhstan," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 29-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2019-002005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=65402&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Giovannini, 2011. "Misurare il benessere equo e sostenibile per cambiare comportamenti individuali e scelte politiche," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2011(1), pages 15-17.
    2. Cheibub, José Antonio & Przeworski, Adam & Saiegh, Sebastian M., 2004. "Government Coalitions and Legislative Success Under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 565-587, October.
    3. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:722-729 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nurlan APAKHAYEV & Kuanysh KOISHYBAIULY & Gulnura KHUDAIBERDINA & Ainur URISBAYEVA & Zhanna KHAMZINA & Yermek BURIBAYEV, 2017. "Legal Basis for Ensuring Freedom of Access to Information on the Operation of State Administration Bodies in Kazakhstan," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 722-729.
    5. Hicks, John, 1977. "Economic Perspectives: Further Essays on Money and Growth," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198284079.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose María Martín‐Martín & María S. Ostos‐Rey & Jose A. Salinas‐Fernández, 2019. "Why Regulation Is Needed in Emerging Markets in the Tourism Sector," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 225-254, January.
    2. Angelo Federico Arcelli & Reiner Stefano Masera & Giovanni Tria, 2021. "Da Versailles a Bretton Woods e ai giorni nostri: errori storici e modelli ancora attuali per un sistema monetario internazionale sostenibile (From Bretton Woods to our days: Historic mistakes and mod," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 74(296), pages 249-273.
    3. Ingo Barens & Volker Caspari, 1999. "Old views and new perspectives: on reading Hick's 'Mr. Keynes and the Classics'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 216-241.
    4. Mario Amendola & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Francesco Saraceno, 2004. "Technological Shocks and the Conduct of Monetary Policy," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 55(6), pages 1241-1263.
    5. Sebastian M. Saiegh, 2009. "Coalition Governments And Sovereign Debt Crises," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 232-254, July.
    6. Hernandez-Aramburo, Luis A., 1995. "Wicksell's monetary theory," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 863-867, May.
    7. James A. Robinson & Ragnar Torvik, 2016. "Endogenous Presidentialism," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 907-942.
    8. Antonio Bianco, 2016. "Hicks’s thread (out of the equilibrium labyrinth)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(4), pages 1229-1245.
    9. William R. White, 2013. "Is Monetary Policy a Science? The Interaction of Theory and Practice over the Last 50 Years," SUERF 50th Anniversary Volume Chapters, in: Morten Balling & Ernest Gnan (ed.), 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges, chapter 3, pages 73-116, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum.
    10. Rudiger Dornbusch & Jacob A. Frenkel, 1984. "The Gold Standard and the Bank of England in the Crisis of 1847," NBER Chapters, in: A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821-1931, pages 233-276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6492 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Yasuhiro Sakai, 2016. "J.M. Keynes and F.H. Knight : How to Deal with Risk, Probability and Uncertainty," Discussion Papers CRR Discussion Paper Series A: General 15, Shiga University, Faculty of Economics,Center for Risk Research.
    13. Y. Khatri & C. Thirtle & R. Townsend, 1998. "Testing The Induced Innovation Hypothesis: An Application to UK Agriculture, 1953-90," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-28.
    14. Saurabh Pant, 2018. "Power-sharing ‘discontinuities’: Legitimacy, rivalry, and credibility," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 30(1), pages 147-177, January.
    15. Bianco, Antonio, 2015. "Out of Equilibrium: Bases, Basics, Policies, and Accounts," MPRA Paper 65850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Carozzi, Felipe & Cipullo, Davide & Repetto, Luca, 2024. "Powers that be? Political alignment, government formation, and government stability," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Jenifer Piesse & David Schimmelpfennig & Colin Thirtle, 2011. "An error correction model of induced innovation in UK agriculture," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(27), pages 4081-4094.
    18. J. Barkley Rosser, 2020. "Austrian themes and the Cambridge capital theory controversies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 415-431, December.
    19. Eduardo Alemán & Thomas Schwartz, 2006. "Presidential Vetoes in Latin American Constitutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 98-120, January.
    20. W. Robert Brazelton, 1981. "Post Keynesian Economics: An Institutional Compatibility?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 531-542, June.
    21. Andrés Mejía Acosta & María Caridad Araujo & Anibal Pérez-Liñán & Sebastian Saiegh, 2006. "Actores con veto, instituciones caprichosas y políticas de mala calidad: el proceso de diseño de políticas de Ecuador," Research Department Publications 3227, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2019-002005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.