IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School Principals’ Opinions About Level of their Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma KöybaÅŸi

    (Departmant of Education, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey)

Abstract

The aim of the research is to find out that how they evaluate level of entrepreneurship and what sort of individual and environmental problems during they improve their sufficiency of entrepreneurship. The qualitative research’s study group is composed of 20 principals in center of Kocaeli in 2014-2015 years. Inverse sampling technical is used. The data is collected semi-structured interview. The data is analyzed by descriptive analysis. One of the results is that the most of school principals who have got high level of entrepreneurship (f=7) utter their entrepreneurship’s level link to such as diversity, innovation, activity and performance. Half of the school principals who have got low level of entrepreneurship utter their level link to lag behind with developing world. Principals who have high level of entrepreneurship (f=5) have problems about over responsibilities of individual life during improving their sufficiency of entrepreneurship. As well as, the principals have problems such as lack of communication and motivation. In view of environmental conditions, all of participants have problems about improving their sufficiency of entrepreneurship such as work ethic and value conflict and different beliefs, bureaucracy and resource copetition. In parallel with the results, there are various suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma KöybaÅŸi, 2021. "School Principals’ Opinions About Level of their Entrepreneurship," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, May - Aug.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:112
    DOI: 10.26417/ejser.v7i1.p125-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/369
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v4_i2_17/Koybasi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejser.v7i1.p125-129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Aart Scholte, 1999. "Global Civil Society: Changing the World?," CSGR Working papers series 31/99, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), University of Warwick.
    2. Georg Sørensen, 1999. "Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(3), pages 590-604, August.
    3. Robert Jackson, 1999. "Sovereignty in World Politics: a Glance at the Conceptual and Historical Landscape," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(3), pages 431-456, August.
    4. Barkin, J. Samuel & Cronin, Bruce, 1994. "The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 107-130, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    2. Nalin Kumar Mohapatra, 2018. "Regional Processes and Geopolitics of India, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan (IATU)," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 22(1), pages 80-106, June.
    3. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter & Chojnacki, Sven, 1998. "Disasters and violence, 1946-1997: The link between the natural and the social environment," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 98-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Haitham Nobanee & Mehroz Nida Dilshad & Mona Al Dhanhani & Maitha Al Neyadi & Sultan Al Qubaisi & Saeed Al Shamsi, 2021. "Big Data Applications the Banking Sector: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    5. Han, Xia & Lukoianove, Tatiana & Zhao, Shasha & Liu, Xiaohui, 2024. "International relations in international business research: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Benjamen F. Gussen, 2013. "On the problem of scale: Spinozistic sovereignty as the logical foundation of constitutional economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 7(1), November.
    7. Rousska Dimova, 2002. "Theoretical Issues of Economic Globalization," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 44-66.
    8. Surya Sankar Sen, 2021. "Situating the Local in Bilateralism: Assessing Local Impacts of the India–Bangladesh Enclave Exchange," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 25(1), pages 52-72, June.
    9. Mauricio Avellaneda Hortúa [y otros] & Martha Isabel Gómez - Lee, 2021. "Ahora o nunca : gobernanza, coproducción y bioeconomía contra el cambio climático," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 147.
    10. Richard Aidoo & Steve Hess, 2015. "Non-Interference 2.0: China’s Evolving Foreign Policy towards a Changing Africa," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 44(1), pages 107-139.
    11. Remi Chukwudi Okeke & Adeline Nnenna Idike & Azalahu Francis Akwara & Cornelius O. Okorie & Okechukwu E. Ibiam, 2021. "Failure of States, Fragility of States, and the Prospects of Peace in South Sudan," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    12. Chojnacki, Sven, 2001. "The times they are a-changin': Prevention and humanitarianism," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 01-308, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Ferenc Miszlivetz & Jody Jensen, 2013. "The Global Crisis and the Crisis of Democracy: A Cosmopolitan Way Forward?," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 60-69, March.
    14. Chojnacki, Sven & Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter, 2000. "Die Kultur der Prävention: Ein Ansatz zur Zivilisierung internationaler Politik?," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 00-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Karthika Sasikumar, 2017. "Branding India: Constructing a reputation for responsibility in the nuclear order," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 242-254, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.