IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex training Methodology Increases Standard of Amateurs Boxing for Senior

Author

Listed:
  • Sead Bushati

    (University of Sports Tirane)

Abstract

The presented research reflects an aspect of the training process with the amateur boxing champion team of sports club "Tirana" of Albania, for 2019, in which prominent boxers have been prepared, who are worthily represented in national and international activities, winning medals national. Normalization and modeling of the training process in a complex way according to special preparation cycles, in order to qualitatively develop the training indicators, in accordance with the physical, physiological and psychological requirements set by amateur boxing for senior. Experimentation; an original complex training methodology based on macrocycles was experimented, which are divided in 4 phases (adapter, developer, reinforcer and perfection) with senior amateur sports club boxers . "Tirana", within a period of one year (January 6, 201 9 to December 31, 201 9 ) , Athletes are tested 3 times during the year at the beginning, between and the finish.Where they are tested indicatorsphysical movements, special functional and Leonardo platforms are tested. It is worth mentioning the developments in physical , technical and functional indicators,, where there was an average increase of 8.1 percent. N Special test with the first two exercises, marked a rise of 14.9 percent (8:44 percent in the amount of repetitions, 2:26 in the blinking percent in cargo and 4:20 in the blinking percent after one minute) . In Drop-jump test was a marked increase in h 7:55 percent. In te s tin Singel 2 Leg Jump (assisted), at 6.54 percent (FFI, at 5.96 percent, Jump Height, at 7.55 percent and Efficiency, at 6.12 percent). In the Singel leg Jump test (without assistance): 6.17 percent (where F.Mes, Rel, at 7.69 percent, F.Mes.Rel / weight, at 9.73 percent and A. C ontakt time, at 1.09 percent). Conclusion: N of the training process should take advantage character loads pronounced aqnaerobik physiological during which prevailing energy processes anaerobic against those aerobic (process anaerobic alaktik, at 10 percent, anaerbik process lactic glikolitik, 60 percent and aerobic process, to the extent 30 percent).

Suggested Citation

  • Sead Bushati, 2020. "Complex training Methodology Increases Standard of Amateurs Boxing for Senior," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejms_v5_i.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:489
    DOI: 10.26417/277dmq99i
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://brucol.be/index.php/ejms/article/view/6136
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://brucol.be/files/articles/ejms_v5_i3_20/Bushati.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/277dmq99i?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frane Adam, 2014. "Measuring National Innovation Performance," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-39464-5, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carayannis, Elias G. & Goletsis, Yorgos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2018. "Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 4-17.
    2. Meda Andrijauskiene & Daiva Dumciuviene & Alina Stundziene, 2021. "EU framework programmes: positive and negative effects on member states' innovation performance," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(3), pages 471-502, September.
    3. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold & Pyka, Andreas & Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua, 2021. "On the performance and strategy of innovation systems: A multicriteria group decision analysis approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Frane Adam & Maruša Gorišek, 2022. "Towards Sustained and Sustainable Management of COVID-19: An Alternative to the Simplified Return to Pre-Pandemic “Normality’’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Wojciech Nasierowski, 2019. "Assessing Technical Efficiency Of Innovations In Canada: The Global Snapshot," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(03), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Sunio, Varsolo & Fillone, Alexis & Abad, Raymund Paolo & Rivera, Joyce & Guillen, Marie Danielle, 2023. "Why does demand-based transport planning persist? Insights from social practice theory," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Ana Garcia-Bernabeu & José Manuel Cabello & Francisco Ruiz, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Reference Point Based Approach for Assessing Regional Innovation Performance in Spain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Jadranka Švarc & Marina Dabić, 2017. "Evolution of the Knowledge Economy: a Historical Perspective with an Application to the Case of Europe," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(1), pages 159-176, March.
    9. Nasierowski Wojciech, 2019. "Reflections on Discussions About Technical Efficiency of Innovativeness of Countries," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 165-176, January.
    10. Piotr Szklarz, 2023. "The Measurement of Innovation and Development of Regions: The Framework for Quantification Based on Polish Voivodeships," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 534-543.
    11. Proksch, Dorian & Busch-Casler, Julia & Haberstroh, Marcus Max & Pinkwart, Andreas, 2019. "National health innovation systems: Clustering the OECD countries by innovative output in healthcare using a multi indicator approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 169-179.
    12. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2019. "Visually Hypothesising in Scientific Paper Writing: Confirming and Refuting Qualitative Research Hypotheses Using Diagrams," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Iizuka, Michiko & Hollanders, Hugo, 2017. "The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries," MERIT Working Papers 2017-032, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Nasierowski Wojciech, 2016. "Composite Indexes Economic and Social Performance: Do they Provide Valuable Information?," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 167-174, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.