IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3ap213-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Experience of Techno-parks in the Russian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Grigoriy Arturovich Klyucharev
  • Irina Olegovna Tyurina
  • Alexandr Viktorovich Neverov

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the problem of a technological gap between the Russian Federation and developed and rapidly developing countries, as well by insufficient effectiveness of the activities of technology parks in modern Russian science-based economy. Even though many techno-parks are functioning in the Russian Federation today, their performance indicators are not always satisfactory, which reduces the pace of innovative development of the state. Therefore, the work of modern Russian technology parks needs to be optimized, especially from the viewpoint of stimulating the development of science-intensive technologies. The purpose of this study is to identify the ways to improve the performance of the modern Russian techno-parks in creating and developing knowledge-intensive and innovative technologies. International experience in this field has been studied to achieve the objective of the study. Next, the authors conducted a comparative analysis (quantitative and qualitative) of documents (open sources, reporting and analytical documents, etc.), describing the experience of 12 overseas technology parks, showing strong economic performance. Additionally, an in-depth analysis was performed regarding four techno-parks, which have significant indicators of scientific and innovative activity, and leitmotif non-formalized expert interviews were held with employees of the Tomsk techno-park (a special economic zone, Tomsk, West Siberia) in July 2017. Based on the analysis recommendations were made for improving the Russian techno-parks management system that enhance the effectiveness of research and innovation activities, as well as the commercialization of the obtained results, which is highly significant for the development of Russia’s science-based economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Grigoriy Arturovich Klyucharev & Irina Olegovna Tyurina & Alexandr Viktorovich Neverov, 2017. "International Experience of Techno-parks in the Russian Context," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 213-229.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:213-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stucchi, Rodolfo & Rojo, Sofía & Maffioli, Alessandro & Castillo, Victoria, 2014. "Knowledge Spillovers of Innovation Policy through Labor Mobility: An Impact Evaluation of the FONTAR Program in Argentina," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4779, Inter-American Development Bank.
    2. Alovsat Garaja Aliyev & Roza Ordukhan Shahverdiyeva, 2017. "Development Problems of Information Provision on the Management of High Technology Park," Journal of Information, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10.
    3. Albert N. Link & U Yeong Yang, 2018. "On the growth of Korean technoparks," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 405-410, June.
    4. Phillip H Phan & Sarfraz A Mian & Wadid Lamine (ed.), 2016. "Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation:Theory, Practice, Lessons Learned," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p1088, August.
    5. Naqeeb Ur Rehman, 2017. "A Complementary Relationship between Networks and Organizational Innovation Activities: Evidence from Chile," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 83-106.
    6. Gökçen Arkalı Olcay & Melih Bulu, 2016. "Technoparks and Technology Transfer Offices as Drivers of an Innovation Economy: Lessons from Istanbul's Innovation Spaces," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 71-93, January.
    7. Rodolfo Stucchi & Sofía Rojo & Alessandro Maffioli & Victoria Castillo, 2014. "Knowledge Spillovers of Innovation Policy through Labor Mobility: An Impact Evaluation of the FONTAR Program in Argentina," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 83894, Inter-American Development Bank.
    8. repec:pkp:joinfo:2017:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Jong Hwa Park, 2016. "Brokerage activities in regional innovation networks: the case of Daegu Technopark in Korea," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 260-284, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Irekovna Beglova & Svetlana Irekovna Nasyrova & Azat Vazirovich Yangirov, 2017. "Factors of Economic Behavior of Population in Regional Labor Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 167-182.
    2. Ruben Fotso, 2020. "Evaluation of indirect effects of place-based science-industry transfer policies: Case of French Technological Research Institutes," Working Papers halshs-02998262, HAL.
    3. Sasan Bakhtiari & Robert Breunig & Lisa Magnani & Jacquelyn Zhang, 2020. "Financial Constraints and Small and Medium Enterprises: A Review," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(315), pages 506-523, December.
    4. Ruben Fotso, 2022. "Evaluating the indirect effects of cluster-based innovation policies: the case of the Technological Research Institutes in France," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1070-1114, August.
    5. Koski, Heli & Pajarinen, Mika, 2015. "Mobility of ideas for innovation: The role of inventor-specific knowledge flows," ETLA Working Papers 27, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    6. Eva-María Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez, 2018. "Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1410-1435, October.
    7. Boneu, Franco & Giuliodori, David & Maffioli, Alessandro & Rodríguez, Alejandro & Stucchi, Rodolfo, 2014. "The spillover effects of the ICT cluster support in Córdoba," MPRA Paper 60307, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Florencia Fiorentin & Mariano Pereira & Diana Suárez, 2020. "The relationship between public funds, innovation and employment among Argentinean manufacturing firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 773-791, July.
    9. Aboal, Diego & Perera, Marcelo & Tacsir, Ezequiel & Vairo, Maren, 2018. "A guide for the evaluation of programs of human capital training for science, technology and innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2018-031, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Grimsby, Gjermund, 2018. "Partly risky, partly solid – Performance study of public innovation loans," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1344-1365.
    11. Casaburi, Gabriel & Crespi, Gustavo & De León, Ignacio L. & Figal Garone, Lucas & Grazzi, Matteo & Guaipatín, Carlos & Katz, Jorge & Llisterri, Juan J. & Maffioli, Alessandro & Navarro, Juan Carlos & , 2016. "La política de innovación en América Latina y el Caribe: Nuevos caminos," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 7705, November.
    12. Ruben Fotso, 2020. "Evaluation of indirect effects of place-based science-industry transfer policies: Case of French Technological Research Institutes," Working Papers 2031, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    13. Alberto Albahari & Magnus Klofsten & Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero, 2019. "Science and Technology Parks: a study of value creation for park tenants," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1256-1272, August.
    14. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    15. Larissa Diana Michelam & Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Tan Yigitcanlar & Ana Cristina Fachinelli & Leonardo Vils & Wilson Levy, 2021. "Leveraging Smart and Sustainable Development via International Events: Insights from Bento Gonçalves Knowledge Cities World Summit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    16. Mingfeng Tang & Hao Huang & Grace Walsh & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "The impact of entrepreneurial overconfidence on incubator effectiveness," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 416-440, February.
    17. Alberto Albahari & Andrés Barge-Gil & Salvador Pérez-Canto & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: a literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1489-1531, August.
    18. Scheuplein, Christoph, 2017. "Company builder: Innovatives Risikokapital als Motor des Beschäftigungswachstums," Forschung Aktuell 11/2017, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    19. Eric S. Howard & Albert N. Link, 2019. "An Oasis of Knowledge: the Early History of Gateway University Research Park," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 1037-1063, September.
    20. Samira Yusef Araújo Falani Bezerra & Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, 2024. "Technology Transfer Offices: a Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4455-4488, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    techno-parks; high technology; commercialization of innovation; business incubators; national innovation strategy. JEL Classification: A13; A14; O31; O32; 033;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:213-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.