IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialbp165-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of an Economic Entity’s Income under Resource Constraints: One Variant of the Analytical Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksandr Nestorenko
  • Tetyana Nestorenko
  • Aleksander Ostenda
  • Jana Peliova
  • Antonina Kalinichenko

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the research was to develop a mathematical model for the optimal distribution of resources between two production processes to maximize the total economic entity’s income. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study constructs a mathematical model assuming that production processes are described by arbitrary Cobb-Douglas production functions. An analytical expression for the general form of the contract curve is derived for the model with two production functions and two factor inputs. Additionally, the production possibility frontier (PPF) function is defined analytically, and the parameters for which the PPF curve takes different shapes are examined. The research employs an analytical approach to address the resource allocation problem. The model provides a framework for determining the optimal resource distribution between two production processes to maximize firms' total income. Findings: The study defines the contract curve and production possibility frontier functions for the two-product model analytically. It identifies the parameters influencing the shape of the PPF curve. The research demonstrates that the proposed model allows for an analytical solution to the resource distribution problem, which is crucial for maximizing firms' income. Practical Implications: The proposed solution enables firms with production processes described by the Cobb-Douglas production function to find optimal resource allocation options, thereby increasing their total income and market share. Originality/Value: This study fills a gap by providing an analytical solution to the problem of optimal resource distribution between two production processes, which has been insufficiently addressed in existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksandr Nestorenko & Tetyana Nestorenko & Aleksander Ostenda & Jana Peliova & Antonina Kalinichenko, 2024. "Optimization of an Economic Entity’s Income under Resource Constraints: One Variant of the Analytical Solution," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 165-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:165-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3482/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleftherios Thalassinos & Nejib Hachicha & Amira Hakim, 2022. "The International Spillover Among Sectors and the Interconnectedness to the Global Inflation Cycle," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 12(1), pages 3-11.
    2. Jaka ZGAJNAR & Stane KAVCIC, 2016. "Optimal allocation of production resources under uncertainty: Application of the muliticriteria approach," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(12), pages 556-565.
    3. Guido Friebel & Michael Raith, 2010. "Resource Allocation and Organizational Form," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 1-33, May.
    4. Onur Boyabatlı & Tiecheng Leng & L. Beril Toktay, 2016. "The Impact of Budget Constraints on Flexible vs. Dedicated Technology Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 225-244, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Ning & Matthew J. Sobel, 2018. "Production and Capacity Management with Internal Financing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 147-160, February.
    2. Shuo Liu & Dimitri Migrow, 2019. "Designing organizations in volatile markets," ECON - Working Papers 319, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    3. Laura Alfaro & Nick Bloom & Paola Conconi & Harald Fadinger & Patrick Legros & Andrew F Newman & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2024. "Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 34-72.
    4. Leslie A. Robinson & Phillip C. Stocken, 2013. "Location of Decision Rights Within Multinational Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 1261-1297, December.
    5. Gabriela Antosova & Helmuth Yesid Arias Gomez, 2024. "Recent Long-Term Management of Relation Across Czech- Republic Price Indices and Exchange Rates," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 129-146.
    6. Block, Sidney T. & Friebel, Guido & Heinz, Matthias & Zubanov, Nick, 2022. "Mystery Shopping as a Strategic Management Practice in Multi-Site Firms," IZA Discussion Papers 15599, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Duncan Simester & Juanjuan Zhang, 2010. "Why Are Bad Products So Hard to Kill?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(7), pages 1161-1179, July.
    8. Stanley Baiman & Mirko S. Heinle & Richard Saouma, 2021. "Allocating Resources with Nonmonotonic Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 3239-3253, May.
    9. Leila Agha & Keith Marzilli Ericson & Xiaoxi Zhao, 2020. "The Impact of Organizational Boundaries on Healthcare Coordination and Utilization," NBER Working Papers 28179, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Suraj Prasad & Marcus Tomaino, 2020. "Resources and culture in organizations," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 854-872, October.
    11. Orman, Cuneyt, 2015. "Organization of innovation and capital markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 94-114.
    12. Schmidbauer, Eric, 2019. "Budget selection when agents compete," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 255-268.
    13. Cárdenas, Juan-Camilo & Gómez, Santiago & Mantilla, César, 2019. "Between-group competition enhances cooperation in resource appropriation games," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 17-26.
    14. Coleff, Joaquín, 2011. "Organizational design of multi-product multi-market firms," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1122, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    15. Choe Chongwoo & Park In-Uck, 2011. "Information, Authority, and Corporate Hierarchies," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-39, February.
    16. J. Prince Vijai, 2021. "Production network, technology choice, capacity investment and inventory sourcing decisions: operational hedging under demand uncertainty," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 1164-1191, December.
    17. Pandher, Gurupdesh S. & Vu, Joseph D., 2018. "Divisional managers' compensation to maximize spillovers and cooperation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 44-54.
    18. Jochen Schlapp & Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Vincent Mak, 2015. "Resource Allocation Decisions Under Imperfect Evaluation and Organizational Dynamics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(9), pages 2139-2159, September.
    19. Piotr Borawski & Aneta Beldycka-Borawska & Ireneusz Zuchowski & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2024. "Analyzing the Correlation between Central Bank Interest Rates and Inflation on the Example of Poland within the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 82-95.
    20. Oded Berman & Mohammad M. Fazel-Zarandi & Dmitry Krass, 2019. "Truthful Cheap Talk: Why Operational Flexibility May Lead to Truthful Communication," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1624-1641, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource constraint; Cobb-Douglas production function; income; contract curve; production possibility frontier function.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:165-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.