IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p241-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The War’s Impact on Ukraine’s Agricultural Production – Projections Vs. Real Data

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Kiforenko
  • Iwona Szczepaniak

Abstract

Purpose: Agricultural production of Ukraine’s is vitally important either for Ukraine itself or its partners all over the world. Therefore, the aims of the research were to analyse the agricultural production of Ukraine, including its natural and climatic conditions, and the country’s production value by kinds, encompassing those important for the Ukrainian exports, as well as to compare both the projected trends and values for the said production with the real – time ones, in order to assess the war’s impact. Design/Methodology/Approach: Such methods of scientific research as empirical and comparative analysis, time series analysis, modelling and forecasting, method of trends as well as textual and tabular methods added by bar charts for better data presentation and comparison were used while conducting the research presented in the given paper. The data analysed in the article were taken from the official web page of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. The time frame under analysis is 2000/2010 – 2020/2022, depending on the data availability. Findings: The difference between the projected and real – time data values are especially big in the cases of maize, wheat, sunflower seeds and barley, implying, that war has influenced tremendously the production amounts of the agro products under research, nevertheless being one of the factors impacted the said production as it’s rather the combination of different factors influenced the production amount under research, with the war being the most powerful among them. The production potential of Ukraine's agriculture has been influenced by the war greatly in a negative way though remaining strong enough even on the global level. Practical Implications: The all-encompassing analysis approach applied in the conducted research would be of great use for the scientists in general and researchers interested in similar topics in particular, while the information and data presented in the article would be useful for educators of all the levels as a helping tool in their lessons/lectures/seminars conduction. The presented research is interesting and useful for big and small agricultural companies, including family farmers, administrative bodies officials connected either with agriculture or agro products trade, big and small firms indulged in international trade in general and agro products one in particular, politicians and decision makers, as well as beginners and experienced statisticians and data analysts. Originality/Value: In the presented research it was attempted to make a general analysis for the agro production of Ukraine starting from its natural and climatic conditions description through the soils availability research to the agricultural production of Ukraine by kinds in general and the ones important for the agro exports of Ukraine in particular, attempting to compare the projected trends and values for the said production amounts with the real – time ones, which, in turn, can be considered the novelty approach of the research presented in the given paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Kiforenko & Iwona Szczepaniak, 2024. "The War’s Impact on Ukraine’s Agricultural Production – Projections Vs. Real Data," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 241-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:241-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3433/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2021. "The Case for Long-Term Land Leasing: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Kui Yang & Taiyang Zhong & Yu Zhang & Qi Wen, 2020. "Total factor productivity of urban land use in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1784-1803, December.
    3. Kucher, Anatolii & Kucher, Lesia & Sysoieva, Inna & Pohrishchuk, Borys, 2021. "Economics of soil erosion: case study of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(4), December.
    4. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangqian Wang & Shudong Wang & Yongqiu Xia, 2022. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Malin Song & Weiliang Tao, 2022. "Coupling and coordination analysis of China's regional urban‐rural integration and land‐use efficiency," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1384-1413, September.
    3. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Zhang, Han & Zheng, Jinhui & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhao, Shikuan & Bouri, Elie, 2024. "How does urban land use efficiency improve resource and environment carrying capacity?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2023. "Investigating the Factors Influencing the Intention to Adopt Long-Term Land Leasing in Northern Ireland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Xiao Lu & Yi Qu & Piling Sun & Wei Yu & Wenlong Peng, 2020. "Green Transition of Cultivated Land Use in the Yellow River Basin: A Perspective of Green Utilization Efficiency Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Dong Li, 2024. "Sustainable Ecosystems and the Economics of State Ownership: A Three-Stage Structural Framework and Innovative Insights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11090-11127, September.
    8. Jiang, Guanghui & Wang, Mingzhu & Qu, Yanbo & Zhou, Dingyang & Ma, Wenqiu, 2020. "Towards cultivated land multifunction assessment in China: Applying the “influencing factors-functions-products-demands” integrated framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Wenhan Ren & Yu Chen, 2022. "Realizing the Improvement of Green Total Factor Productivity of the Marine Economy—New Evidence from China’s Coastal Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Kristia Kristia & Sándor Kovács & Zoltán Bács & Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of Provincial Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry & Paul Caskie, 2023. "Barriers and Enablers of Long‐term Land Leasing: a Case Study of Northern Ireland," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(2), pages 20-27, August.
    13. Abdul Munaf Mohamed Irfeey & Mohamed M. M. Najim & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Abou Traore, 2023. "Groundwater Pollution Impact on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Xiaoliang Li & Nan Gao & Mingming Yu, 2021. "Discussion on the Unified Survey and Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale for China’s 3rd National Land Survey: A Case Study of Wen County, Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Chengzhen Song & Qingfang Liu & Jinping Song & Zhengyun Jiang & Zhilin Lu & Yueying Chen, 2022. "Land Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin in the Background of China’s Economic Transformation: Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Yi Qu & Xiao Lyu & Wenlong Peng & Zongfei Xin, 2021. "How to Evaluate the Green Utilization Efficiency of Cultivated Land in a Farming Household? A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Zhaoxia Guo & Qinqin Guo & Yujie Cai & Ge Wang, 2021. "Unraveling Risk Networks of Cultivated Land Protection: An Exploratory Stakeholder-Oriented Case Study in Xiliuhe Town, Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Changyong Yang & Jianyuan Huang & Man Jiao & Qi Yang, 2024. "The Effects of Urbanization on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency of Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration: Mechanism from the Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Yue Zhang & Yaqiang Dai & Yuanyuan Chen & Xinli Ke, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Development of New-Type Urbanization and Cultivated Land Low-Carbon Utilization in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Choi, Jiseon & Jodlowski, Margaret C., 2022. "Tenure Status and Land Investment in South Korea," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322476, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Production; Climatic Conditions; Fertile Soils; Factors of Production; Agricultural Products Exports.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • E27 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:241-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.