IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p838-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Innovation Versus Eco-Investment in the Context of Sustainable Development: The Perspective of Local and Regional Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Brojak-Trzaskowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to identify and systematise eco-innovation and eco-investment as components of sustainable socio-economic development. In addition, a comparative analysis of investments and eco-innovations was carried out. This means that the subject of the study covers undertakings oriented towards the preservation and protection of nature, while the subjects of the study are selected spatial units in Poland, i.e. a specific regional system - Western Pomerania - and a local system - Szczecin. A hypothesis was formulated that eco-innovations and eco-investments are important elements of the development potential of regional and local economies, and their activation and intensification ensure sustainable development at the environmental, social and economic levels. Adequately to the objective and hypothesis, the following research questions were formulated: what constitutes eco-innovation and eco-investment, what are the similarities and differences between these concepts, and why are these projects such an important element of sustainable development? Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology in the theoretical part was based on a critical analysis of the literature on the subject (especially journals and monographs). This part also employs a comparative analysis method in identifying differentiating features and analogies between eco-innovation and eco-investment. The empirical and pragmatic part is descriptive and explanatory, especially with regard to the identification of ecological undertakings as drivers of sustainable development of economies in selected spatial units - regional and local systems. The synthesis method was used in the formulation of conclusions. Findings: The research methodology applied and the cognitive and empirical studies carried out made it possible to systematise eco-innovation and eco-investment and to identify similarities and differences between these terms. In addition, their significance from the perspective of regional and local economies was verified. The research was carried out on the example of selected spatial systems as a basis for sustainable socio-economic development across the country. Practical Implications: Analysis of exemplary development projects of an ecological nature has shown that eco-investments and eco-innovations are one of the pillars of sustainable economic development on a regional and/or local scale. Stimulators in this respect are the active activities of enterprises, business environment institutions, various organisations and associations, local government units, as well as the pro-development policy of the state, especially the investment and innovation policy. What is important here is the integration and coordination of ecological activities at the microeconomic level (represented by business), at the mesoeconomic level (local government units in terms of regional and local socio-economic development policy) and at the macroeconomic level (in terms of state policy). Eco-innovation and eco-investment should be integral elements of sustainable socio-economic development, not only at the regional and local scale, but also at the national level as a whole. This is due to the fact that the national economy is the sum of regional and local economies. Originality/value: The article addresses the topical and important issue of sustainable development at regional and local levels through the lens of environmentally oriented development projects. The rationale behind the choice of topic is both the topicality and importance of these issues and the identification of a theoretical and pragmatic gap, especially in terms of comparative analysis regarding eco-innovation and eco-investment. The article combines theoretical and empirical research into a coherent whole, filling the diagnosed gap of a cognitive and applied nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Brojak-Trzaskowska, 2024. "Eco-Innovation Versus Eco-Investment in the Context of Sustainable Development: The Perspective of Local and Regional Economies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 838-848.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:838-848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3821/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirela Cristea & Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Constantin Ștefan Ponea & Carmen Claudia Durău, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials of Agricultural Companies—The Interplay with Company Size," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Thanh Hung Pham & Thi Thanh Hang Hoang & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos & Hoang Anh Le, 2022. "The Impact of Quality of Public Administration on Local Economic Growth in Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Eun Kyung Jang & Mi Sun Park & Tae Woo Roh & Ki Joo Han, 2015. "Policy Instruments for Eco-Innovation in Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Carla Gonçalves Machado & Mats Peter Winroth & Elias Hans Dener Ribeiro da Silva, 2020. "Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1462-1484, March.
    5. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Ana Labella-Fernández & M. Mar Serrano-Arcos & Belén Payán-Sánchez, 2021. "Firm Growth as a Driver of Sustainable Product Innovation: Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Evidence from Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Varadarajan, Rajan & Kaul, Rupali, 2018. "Doing well by doing good innovations: alleviation of social problems in emerging markets through corporate social innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 225-233.
    6. Jae Yun Jeong & Inje Kang & Ki Seok Choi & Byeong-Hee Lee, 2018. "Network Analysis on Green Technology in National Research and Development Projects in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Hossein Rahnama & Kerstin Johansen & Lisa Larsson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2022. "Collaboration in Value Constellations for Sustainable Production: The Perspective of Small Technology Solution Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Karine Borges de Oliveira & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2022. "Making Hospitals Sustainable: Towards Greener, Fairer and More Prosperous Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    11. Chih-Hsing Liu & Quoc Phong La & Yen-Ling Ng & Rullyana Puspitaningrum Mamengko, 2023. "Discovering the Sustainable Innovation Service Process of Organizational Environment, Information Sharing and Satisfaction: The Moderating Roles of Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Angelito Calma & José Martí-Parreño & Martin Davies, 2019. "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1973–2018: an analytical retrospective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 879-908, May.
    13. Tulin Dzhengiz & Eva Niesten, 2020. "Competences for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review on the Impact of Absorptive Capacity and Capabilities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 881-906, April.
    14. Celia Rangel-Pérez & Belen López & Manuel Fernández, 2024. "A strategic sustainability model for global luxury companies in the management of CO2 emissions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1597-1615, September.
    15. Abrar ul haq, Muhammad, 2018. "A Role of Corporate Governance and Firm’s Environmental Performance: A Moderating Role of Institutional Regulations," MPRA Paper 100047, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    16. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Ana Teresa Tavares-Lehmann & Celeste Varum, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Wang, Nan & Wan, Jiahao & Ma, Zhenzhong & Zhou, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2023. "How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Nagel, Christian & Heidenreich, Sven & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Enhancing Adoption of Sustainable Product Innovations: Addressing Reduced Performance with Risk-Reducing Product Modifications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional analysis; regional development; regional and local economies; sustainable economic development; eco-innovation and eco-investment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D25 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:838-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.