IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p838-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Innovation Versus Eco-Investment in the Context of Sustainable Development: The Perspective of Local and Regional Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Brojak-Trzaskowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to identify and systematise eco-innovation and eco-investment as components of sustainable socio-economic development. In addition, a comparative analysis of investments and eco-innovations was carried out. This means that the subject of the study covers undertakings oriented towards the preservation and protection of nature, while the subjects of the study are selected spatial units in Poland, i.e. a specific regional system - Western Pomerania - and a local system - Szczecin. A hypothesis was formulated that eco-innovations and eco-investments are important elements of the development potential of regional and local economies, and their activation and intensification ensure sustainable development at the environmental, social and economic levels. Adequately to the objective and hypothesis, the following research questions were formulated: what constitutes eco-innovation and eco-investment, what are the similarities and differences between these concepts, and why are these projects such an important element of sustainable development? Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology in the theoretical part was based on a critical analysis of the literature on the subject (especially journals and monographs). This part also employs a comparative analysis method in identifying differentiating features and analogies between eco-innovation and eco-investment. The empirical and pragmatic part is descriptive and explanatory, especially with regard to the identification of ecological undertakings as drivers of sustainable development of economies in selected spatial units - regional and local systems. The synthesis method was used in the formulation of conclusions. Findings: The research methodology applied and the cognitive and empirical studies carried out made it possible to systematise eco-innovation and eco-investment and to identify similarities and differences between these terms. In addition, their significance from the perspective of regional and local economies was verified. The research was carried out on the example of selected spatial systems as a basis for sustainable socio-economic development across the country. Practical Implications: Analysis of exemplary development projects of an ecological nature has shown that eco-investments and eco-innovations are one of the pillars of sustainable economic development on a regional and/or local scale. Stimulators in this respect are the active activities of enterprises, business environment institutions, various organisations and associations, local government units, as well as the pro-development policy of the state, especially the investment and innovation policy. What is important here is the integration and coordination of ecological activities at the microeconomic level (represented by business), at the mesoeconomic level (local government units in terms of regional and local socio-economic development policy) and at the macroeconomic level (in terms of state policy). Eco-innovation and eco-investment should be integral elements of sustainable socio-economic development, not only at the regional and local scale, but also at the national level as a whole. This is due to the fact that the national economy is the sum of regional and local economies. Originality/value: The article addresses the topical and important issue of sustainable development at regional and local levels through the lens of environmentally oriented development projects. The rationale behind the choice of topic is both the topicality and importance of these issues and the identification of a theoretical and pragmatic gap, especially in terms of comparative analysis regarding eco-innovation and eco-investment. The article combines theoretical and empirical research into a coherent whole, filling the diagnosed gap of a cognitive and applied nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Brojak-Trzaskowska, 2024. "Eco-Innovation Versus Eco-Investment in the Context of Sustainable Development: The Perspective of Local and Regional Economies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 838-848.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:838-848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3821/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional analysis; regional development; regional and local economies; sustainable economic development; eco-innovation and eco-investment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D25 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:838-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.