Author
Listed:
- Katarzyna Skrzypek
- Paulina Rewers
- Karol Dabrowski
- Krzysztof Zywicki
- Rafal Mierzwiak
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to analyze various sustainability reporting standards and to systematize knowledge about various reporting techniques and tools, indicating potential benefits and risks arising from them. Design/Research questions: The following research problem was formulated in the article: What are the challenges and benefits of implementing international sustainability standards (ESG) in various industries, as well as their impact on the effectiveness of companies' activities in the field of sustainable development? The following research hypotheses were also adopted: H1: Implementation of sustainability standards is associated with challenges related to resource allocation and the risk of greenwashing. H2: Implementation of sustainability standards positively affects the level of stakeholder engagement and improves the company's image on the market. Findings: The conducted analysis allowed for drawing the following conclusion:, in the preparation of a new method of SD reporting, it would be advisable to move away from ambiguously defined, descriptive, discretionary and subjective indicators, the development of a model and method for assessing sustainable development should be based on objective data from, for example, an ERP system, it is reasonable to create an IT tool that would allow manufacturing companies to quickly perform self-assessment of sustainable development. According to the authors of the article, such an approach would break down some of the barriers that prevent manufacturing companies from making the decision to be sustainable. Practical Recommendations: The study shows that effective sustainability reporting requires continuous reflection, innovation and collaboration between different stakeholders. Companies should be proactive in their actions and strive for transparency, which will ultimately contribute to achieving real sustainability on a global scale. Originality/Value: The study is an attempt to fill the gap in the literature concerning the presentation and summary of the actual advantages and disadvantages of different sustainability reporting methods. The conclusions drawn from the study inspired the authors of the article to attempt, in further research, to standardize the preparation of sustainability reports together with the indication of key indicators and measures.
Suggested Citation
Katarzyna Skrzypek & Paulina Rewers & Karol Dabrowski & Krzysztof Zywicki & Rafal Mierzwiak, 2024.
"A Literature Review of Sustainability Reporting by Manufacturing Companies,"
European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 582-599.
Handle:
RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:1:p:582-599
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:1:p:582-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.