IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial4p734-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Efficiency of Polish Social Cooperatives Operating in Tourism and Event

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Blazejowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the economic effectiveness of Polish social cooperatives operating in the tourism and events sector and the factors determining this effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach: The study used such research methods and techniques as, analysis of primary and secondary documents, dynamics indexes, sales profitability analysis. The documents enabling the determination of the economic situation of the cooperative were the current financial statements, balance sheets, profit and loss accounts and reports on activities obtained from the National Court Register. The selection of a cooperative for research was guided by the fact that the financial statements had been submitted and that it had been operating on the market for at least 3 years. The research covers data up to and including 2019, i.e., from the period before COVID-19. All Polish social cooperatives operating in the tourism and events industry were analyzed. Findings: In the years 2006-2017, 168 cooperatives were established in Poland in the area of tourism and events, 64% of which are in operation. Despite the obtained financial support, 61 (36%) entities, including (82%) established by natural persons, did not survive. The results of this study show that the financial condition of social cooperatives operating in the field of tourism and events is poor. Only 26% of them achieve profits, 50% balance their activities with a small profit, and 24% achieve no profit and have declining revenues. Almost half (48%) of the surveyed entities generate annual revenues of up to PLN 100 thous., and 36% in the range from PLN 100 to 300 thous. Research shows that the economic efficiency of cooperatives results mainly from their legal form and the possibility of diversifying their activities. Practical implications: The research results are helpful for organizations supporting activities in the field of social economy and social cooperatives. In order to improve the functioning and increase the number of social cooperatives operating in the tourism industry and to improve their economic efficiency, it is necessary to change the way of their management and legislative changes. Originality/value: For the first time, all Polish social cooperatives operating in the field of tourism and events were analyzed and a critical analysis of the financial situation of social cooperatives was made in relation to their legal form.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Blazejowska, 2021. "Economic Efficiency of Polish Social Cooperatives Operating in Tourism and Event," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 734-748.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:734-748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2802/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Urbano & Elisabeth Ferri & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Sebastian Aparicio, 2017. "Social Entrepreneurship and Institutional Factors: A Literature Review," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Frédèric Teulon & Dominique Bonet-Fernandez (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors, chapter 0, pages 9-29, Springer.
    2. Johanna Mair & Ignasi Marti, 2006. "Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight," Post-Print hal-02311880, HAL.
    3. Zsuzsanna Kispál-Vitai & Yann Regnard & Klara Kövesi & Claude-André Guillotte, 2019. "Cooperative case studies from three countries: Is membership a problem or a solution in the 21 st century?," Post-Print hal-02351404, HAL.
    4. Jacques Defourny & Marthe Nyssens, 2010. "Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 32-53, March.
    5. Carlo Borzaga & Riccardo Bodini & Chiara Carini & Sara Depedri & Giulia Galera & Gianluca Salvatori, 2014. "Europe in Transition: The Role of Social Cooperatives and Social Enterprises," Euricse Working Papers 1469, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    6. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Frédèric Teulon & Dominique Bonet-Fernandez (ed.), 2017. "Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-3-319-50850-4, November.
    7. Zsuzsanna Kispál-Vitai & Yann Regnard & Klara Kövesi & Claude-André Guillotte, 2019. "Cooperative case studies from three countries: Is membership a problem or a solution in the 21st century?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(4), pages 467-485, December.
    8. Mair, Johanna & Martí, Ignasi, 2006. "Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 36-44, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Nadarević, Sabine & Martin, Alexander, 2020. "A comparative study on the institutional determinants of social entrepreneurial activity: The moderating effect of capitalism," Flensburger Hefte zu Unternehmertum und Mittelstand 19, Jackstädt-Zentrum Flensburg.
    3. Agnieszka Pacut, 2020. "Drivers toward Social Entrepreneurs Engagement in Poland: An Institutional Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Gift Dafuleya, 2014. "Social Value Creation and Institution-Entrepreneurial Dynamics in a Three Sector Economy," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(10), pages 795-809.
    6. Karina Cagarman & Jan Kratzer & Katharina Osbelt, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship: Dissection of a Phenomenon through a German Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Rama Murthy, Sudhir & Roll, Kate & Colin-Jones, Alastair, 2021. "Ending business-non-profit partnerships: The spinout of social enterprises," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    8. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    9. Mara Willemijn van Twuijver & Lucas Olmedo & Mary O’Shaughnessy & Thia Hennessy, 2020. "Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(2), pages 121-142, March.
    10. Etayankara Muralidharan & Saurav Pathak, 2019. "Consequences of Cultural Leadership Styles for Social Entrepreneurship: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Singaram, Raja & Radu-Lefebvre, Miruna & Gartner, William B., 2023. "Gordian knot uncut: Understanding the problem of founder exit in social ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    12. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    13. Lucia DURAC & Liliana Mihaela MOGA & Ionica SIMBANU & Daniel TECU, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis Between Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 69-77.
    14. Anthony Igwe & Anastasia Ogbo & Emmanuel Agbaeze & James Abugu & Charity Ezenwakwelu & Henry Okwo, 2020. "Self-Efficacy and Subjective Norms as Moderators in the Networking Competence–Social Entrepreneurial Intentions Link," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    15. Karina Cagarman & Jan Kratzer & Laura Helen von Arnim & Kristina Fajga & Michaela Jacqueline Gieseke, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship on Its Way to Significance: The Case of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Figueiredo, Vítor & Franco, Mário, 2018. "Wine cooperatives as a form of social entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence about their impact on society," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 812-821.
    17. Ana Fernández-Laviada & Carlos López-Gutiérrez & Andrea Pérez, 2020. "How Does the Development of the Social Enterprise Sector Affect Entrepreneurial Behavior? An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Leitão, Maria Eugénia & Amaral, Miguel & Carvalho, Ana, 2024. "Reconceptualizing socio-tech entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    20. Kai Hockerts, 2017. "Determinants of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 105-130, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social entrepreneurship; social cooperative; economic efficiency; cooperative of legal persons; cooperative of natural persons; tourism and events.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D69 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Other
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:734-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.