IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4p464-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Attributes of Organizational Structure Affects Knowledge Management Processes in High-Technology Companies?

Author

Listed:
  • Sylwia Flaszewska

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims to identify links between attributes of organizational structure and knowledge management processes in high technology companies. Approach/Methodology/Design: The research was conducted in 100 Polish high-tech companies. Findings: The results show that high-tech enterprises carry out different number of sub-process of knowledge management in different combinations. Surveyed companies confirm that different structural features are needed depending on the phase/sub-process of knowledge management. It is recommended to redesign the organizational structure in such a way that it corresponds to the key knowledge management processes as much as possible. Flexibility was found to have the most supportive effect on five of the seven knowledge management sub-processes studied. Practical Implications: The results can serve as a guide for managers in improving the organizational structure for knowledge management needs. Originality/Value: The attributes of organizational structure supportive and inhibiting knowledge management processes for high-tech companies were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylwia Flaszewska, 2021. "How Attributes of Organizational Structure Affects Knowledge Management Processes in High-Technology Companies?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 464-474.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:464-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2600/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Gentile-Lüdecke & Rui Torres de Oliveira & Justin Paul, 2020. "Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1091-1112, December.
    2. Simona Gentile-Lüdecke & Rui Torres de Oliveira & Justin Paul, 0. "Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muddassar Sarfraz & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Larisa Ivascu & Muhammad Asim Ali Qureshi, 2022. "Explicating the impact of hierarchical CEO succession on small‐medium enterprises' performance and cash holdings," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2600-2614, April.
    2. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Steen, John & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Creating value by giving away: A typology of different innovation revealing strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 137-150.
    3. Rui Torres de Oliveira & Simona Gentile-Lüdecke & Sandra Figueira, 2022. "Barriers to innovation and innovation performance: the mediating role of external knowledge search in emerging economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1953-1974, April.
    4. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Nguyen, Tam & Liesch, Peter & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Exporting to escape and learn: Vietnamese manufacturers in global value chains," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    5. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Valliappan Raju, 2021. "Technology and Entrepreneurial Marketing Decisions During COVID-19," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 95-112, June.
    6. Rui Zhao & Jingbo Fan, 2024. "Digital Policy Quality and Enterprise Innovation: The Case of China’s Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Duc Anh Nguyen & Liliana Mitkova, 2024. "Recent research trends in open innovation in SMEs: a bibliometric literature review," Post-Print hal-04712830, HAL.
    8. Saeed Nosratabadi & Parvaneh Bahrami & Khodayar Palouzian & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Leader Cultural Intelligence and Organizational Performance," Papers 2010.02678, arXiv.org.
    9. Marta Widz & Nadine Kammerlander, 2023. "Entrepreneurial exit intentions in emerging economies: a neoinstitutional perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 615-638, February.
    10. Jie Yang & Mingxing Yu, 2022. "The Influence of Institutional Support on the Innovation Performance of New Ventures: The Mediating Mechanism of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Nguyen, Tam & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Steen, John & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "Government support versus international knowledge: Investigating innovations from emerging-market small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Javier Martínez‐Falcó & Bartolomé Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez & Eduardo Sánchez‐García, 2024. "The effect of organizational ambidexterity on sustainable performance: A structural equation analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 773-803, October.
    13. Zahoor, Nadia & Donbesuur, Francis & Christofi, Michael & Miri, Domnan, 2022. "Technological innovation and employee psychological well-being: The moderating role of employee learning orientation and perceived organizational support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Abhari, Kaveh & McGuckin, Summer, 2023. "Limiting factors of open innovation organizations: A case of social product development and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Yildirim, Ercan & AR, Ilker Murat & Dabić, Marina & Baki, Birdogan & Peker, Iskender, 2022. "A multi-stage decision making model for determining a suitable innovation structure using an open innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 379-391.
    16. Omar Carrasco-Carvajal & Mauricio Castillo-Vergara & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2023. "Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 397-442, February.
    17. Rhaiem, Khalil & Doloreux, David, 2024. "Inbound open innovation in SMEs: A microfoundations perspective of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Angelidou, Sofia & Mount, Matthew & Pandza, Krsto, 2022. "Exploring the asymmetric complementarity between external knowledge search and management innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Benny Lianto, 2023. "Identifying Key Assessment Factors for a Company’s Innovation Capability Based on Intellectual Capital: An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Luiz Antonio de Camargo Guerrazzi & Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra & Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Vanessa Vasconcelos Scazziota, 2022. "Using Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling to Advance Entrepreneurship Research: A Study on the Liabilities of Newness and Smallness," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(3), pages 603-631, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational structure; knowledge management; high-tech enterprises.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:464-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.