IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2-part1p748-754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The SMEs in a Pandemic Period in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Zbigniew Malara
  • Rafal Misko

Abstract

Purpose: A synthetic assessment of SMEs functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland and an attempt to identify additional rescue and convalescent solutions that would help maintain SME's potential in the COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Design/Approach/Methodology: Query of the literature and analysis of legal documents. Findings: The article contains original conclusions and postulates useful, according to the authors, in taking rescue actions and helping to preserve and renew the potential of SMEs. Practical Implications: Due to the article's assumptions and framework, it was limited to formulating indications without operationalizing the methods of their implementation into practice. Nevertheless, the practical importance of the paper does not seem to raise any doubts, especially for the needs of SMEs operating in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/Value: Development of postulates having the nature of solutions that should help preserve and improve the efficiency, quality, and effectiveness of SMEs functioning, not present in the studies encountered so far.

Suggested Citation

  • Zbigniew Malara & Rafal Misko, 2021. "The SMEs in a Pandemic Period in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 748-754.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2-part1:p:748-754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2153/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konrad Stanczyk, 2020. "“Anti-Crisis Shield” as an Example of State Interventionism During the Crisis Caused by the Covid-19 Virus Pandemic in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 116-136.
    2. Ahmad Al-Fadly, 2020. "Impact of COVID-19 on SMEs and employment," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 629-648, December.
    3. Dirk Czarnitzki & Cindy Lopes-Bento, 2014. "Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 380-409, July.
    4. Xiaohua Yu & Chang Liu & Hanjie Wang & Jan-Henning Feil, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on food prices in China: evidence of four major food products from Beijing, Shandong and Hubei Provinces," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 445-458, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:748-754 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sergio Afcha & Jose García-Quevedo, 2016. "The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(6), pages 955-975.
    3. Beck, Mathias & Junge, Martin & Kaiser, Ulrich, 2017. "Public Funding and Corporate Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 11196, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    5. Barajas, Ascensión & Huergo, Elena & Moreno, Lourdes, 2017. "Public Support to Business R&D and the Economic Crisis: Spanish Evidence," MPRA Paper 81529, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Montmartin, Benjamin & Herrera, Marcos & Massard, Nadine, 2018. "The impact of the French policy mix on business R&D: How geography matters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 2010-2027.
    7. Jia, Junsheng & He, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Taiyu & Zhang, Eryu, 2023. "Does green finance reform promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera & Paulo Neto & Maria Manuel Serrano, 2019. "How internationalization and competitiveness contribute to get public support to innovation? The Portuguese case," GEE Papers 0121, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised May 2019.
    9. Lee, Jeongwon & Hwang, Junseok & Kim, Hana, 2022. "Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Enrico Vanino & Stephen Roper & Bettina Becker, 2020. "Knowledge to Money: Assessing the Business Performance Effects of Publicly Funded R&D Grants," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 20-24, January.
    11. Dirk Czarnitzki & Malte Prüfer, 2024. "The Interplay between Public Procurement of Innovation and R&D Grants: Empirical Evidence from Belgium," Working Papers of ECOOM - Centre for Research and Development Monitoring 746875, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), ECOOM - Centre for Research and Development Monitoring.
    12. Cátia Rosário & Celeste Varum & Anabela Botelho, 2024. "The Role of Public Incentives in Promoting Innovation: An Analysis of Recurrently Supported Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Stojcic, Nebojsa, 2019. "Access to EU public financial support and commercialization of innovations: evidence from hospitality industries in Spain and Croatia," MPRA Paper 108647, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2015. "R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 465-485, October.
    15. Shuang Wang & Shukuan Zhao & Dong Shao & Hongyu Liu, 2020. "Impact of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing Innovation in China: The Moderating Role of Political Connections and Investor Attention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Cristiano Antonelli, 2020. "Knowledge exhaustibility public support to business R&D and the additionality constraint," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 649-663, June.
    17. Vlasova, Valeriya, 2021. "Industry-science cooperation and public policy instruments utilization in the private sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 519-528.
    18. Lewandowska Małgorzata Stefania & Weresa Marzenna Anna & Rószkiewicz Małgorzata, 2022. "Evaluating the impact of public financial support on innovation activities of European Union enterprises: Additionality approach," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(3), pages 248-266, September.
    19. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera & Giovanni Cerulli, 2019. "Assessing Financing, Innovation and Growth Linkage: New Evidence for Policy," Working Paper 54d93216-99f7-4438-975d-2, European Microfinance Network.
    20. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Lopes-Bento, Cindy, 2013. "Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 76-89.
    21. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Zahra Hashemi, 2023. "The Impact of Government Interventions on the Performance of Biotechnology, Information and Communications Technology, and Electrical and Electronics Firms: Evidence from Iran," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 735-751, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; development programs; aid.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2-part1:p:748-754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.