IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial1p462-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transport on Demand in the Opinion of Users: A Case Study for Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Kwarcinski

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to review the literature in terms of cross-sections of the assessment of the functioning of transport on-demand (ToD) and to present one's own views in this area, based on the research results. Design/Methodology/Approach: The basis for the assessment was a study conducted by the author among ToD passengers in Szczecin (Poland). In the literature a synthetic assessment of transportation on demand is undertaken much more often. It concerns more the supply side of the market, while the demand side is affected less frequently. Hence, it appears to be well-founded and valuable, both in epistemic terms, to present the assessment of transportation on demand in terms of demand, which is referred to in this article. Transport on-demand comprises a precious completion of public transport and an alternative for individual motorization. The offer is dedicated for areas where there is a low and/or volatile demand for transport services. Findings: The presented research results on the opinions of users of the transportation-on-demand service in Szczecin confirmed that it is primarily used by frequent transportation users. This is also reflected in the most frequently chosen travel destinations, which includes commuting to places of learning and workplaces. Among the various cross-sections of the analysis, it is also worth paying attention to the opinion of young people using the transport on demand service. Their responses show greater concern for the condition of the natural environment and the need for faster teleinformation changes related to the ToD service. Practical Implications: They can be used to improve the management system of ToD. Originality value: The literature presents no research related to this subject concerning Poland. This article may fill the knowledge gap in the assessment of transportation on demand. In Poland, this research is pioneering.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Kwarcinski, 2020. "Transport on Demand in the Opinion of Users: A Case Study for Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 462-475.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:462-475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1915/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Lee & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "An extended demand responsive connector," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 25-50, March.
    2. Christophe Saroli, 2015. "Passenger Transport in Rural and Sparsely Populated Areas in France," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2015/9, OECD Publishing.
    3. Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2009. "Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 39-45.
    4. Badia, Hugo & Estrada, Miquel & Robusté, Francesc, 2014. "Competitive transit network design in cities with radial street patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 161-181.
    5. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "Structure of competitive transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 434-446, May.
    6. Nelson, John D. & Wright, Steve & Masson, Brian & Ambrosino, Giorgio & Naniopoulos, Aristotelis, 2010. "Recent developments in Flexible Transport Services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 243-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Liu, Yining & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2021. "Mobility service design via joint optimization of transit networks and demand-responsive services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 22-41.
    3. Mahmoud Owais & Abdou S. Ahmed & Ghada S. Moussa & Ahmed A. Khalil, 2020. "An Optimal Metro Design for Transit Networks in Existing Square Cities Based on Non-Demand Criterion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Sihvola, Teemu & Mladenovic, Milos N., 2019. "Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 123-133.
    5. Moccia, Luigi & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "Improved models for technology choice in a transit corridor with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 245-270.
    6. Masing, Berenike & Lindner, Niels & Borndörfer, Ralf, 2022. "The price of symmetric line plans in the Parametric City," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 419-443.
    7. Dikas, G. & Minis, I., 2014. "Scheduled paratransit transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 18-34.
    8. Hugo Badia, 2020. "Comparison of Bus Network Structures in Face of Urban Dispersion for a Ring-Radial City," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-271, March.
    9. Fournier, Nicholas, 2021. "Hybrid pedestrian and transit priority zoning policies in an urban street network: Evaluating network traffic flow impacts with analytical approximation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 254-274.
    10. Fabien Li & Sheng Badia, 2018. "Structural design of a hierarchical urban transit network integrating modal choice and environmental impacts," Post-Print hal-02010003, HAL.
    11. Luo, Sida & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Paired-line hybrid transit design considering spatial heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 320-339.
    12. Chen, Peng (Will) & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2018. "Optimal design of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit: Case of radial route structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 71-89.
    13. Chen, Haoyu & Gu, Weihua & Cassidy, Michael J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2015. "Optimal transit service atop ring-radial and grid street networks: A continuum approximation design method and comparisons," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 755-774.
    14. Fan, Wenbo & Mei, Yu & Gu, Weihua, 2018. "Optimal design of intersecting bimodal transit networks in a grid city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 203-226.
    15. Sohani Liyanage & Hussein Dia & Rusul Abduljabbar & Saeed Asadi Bagloee, 2019. "Flexible Mobility On-Demand: An Environmental Scan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-39, February.
    16. van Engelen, Matti & Cats, Oded & Post, Henk & Aardal, Karen, 2018. "Enhancing flexible transport services with demand-anticipatory insertion heuristics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 110-121.
    17. Fielbaum, Andrés & Jara-Diaz, Sergio & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Beyond the Mohring effect: Scale economies induced by transit lines structures design," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    18. Sohani Liyanage & Hussein Dia, 2020. "An Agent-Based Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Performance of On-Demand Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Ryley, Tim J. & A. Stanley, Peter & P. Enoch, Marcus & M. Zanni, Alberto & A. Quddus, Mohammed, 2014. "Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 364-372.
    20. Alan Lee & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "An extended demand responsive connector," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 25-50, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Flexible transport systems; demand; user ratings.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:462-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.