IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i4p771-784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Econometric Analysis of Residential Trash Incineration Based on Cross-Sectional Data

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Csuvar
  • Robert Barna

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this paper is to determine the areas that can be a basis for government regulation to reduce illicit residential trash incineration, thus air pollution as well. Design/Methodology/Approach: We used OLS estimation to examine which factors can have a significant effect on consumer behaviour, so by their regulation the incineration could be reduced. We included 10 explanatory variables in the study, our most important hypotheses were about the effects of material well-being and forestation. Findings: Based on our results, whilst the welfare does not have an effect, the increase in forestation (firewood supply) has a reducing effect on illegal burning, however, it is not among the strongest factors in terms of elasticity. Of the factors examined, the greatest impact is caused by the overcrowding of dwellings: less crowded dwellings are less prone to illegal burning. In addition, power consumption, education, and population density are important variables. Practical Implications: Overall, we can say that state intervention in support of education, the enlargement of the urban environment and the availability of modern energy sources can be effective means of combating illegal trash incineration. We note that our model is based on strong simplifications, so the results can significantly distort reality. More precise and more reliable data is needed to improve the estimation, so we urge that this data be included and published as soon as possible. Originality/Value: As we know residential trash incineration has never been investigated from an economic angle with these kind of variables. Our work might be able to add a new approach to this field of study that highlights the opportunities and weaknesses of this topic and provides an incentive for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Csuvar & Robert Barna, 2020. "Econometric Analysis of Residential Trash Incineration Based on Cross-Sectional Data," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 771-784.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:771-784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1713/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter, 2016. "Household energy choice and consumption intensity: Empirical evidence from Bhutan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 993-1009.
    2. Lange, Ian & Moro, Mirko & Traynor, Laura, 2014. "Green hypocrisy?: Environmental attitudes and residential space heating expenditure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 76-83.
    3. Dorota Janiszewska & Luiza Ossowska, 2020. "Biomass as the Most Popular Renevable Energy Source in EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 315-326.
    4. Chunshui Lin & Ru-Jin Huang & Darius Ceburnis & Paul Buckley & Jana Preissler & John Wenger & Matteo Rinaldi & Maria Christina Facchini & Colin O’Dowd & Jurgita Ovadnevaite, 2018. "Extreme air pollution from residential solid fuel burning," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 512-517, September.
    5. Shafik, Nemat, 1994. "Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(0), pages 757-773, Supplemen.
    6. Song, Nianfu & Aguilar, Francisco X. & Shifley, Stephen R. & Goerndt, Michael E., 2012. "Analysis of U.S. residential wood energy consumption: 1967–2009," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2116-2124.
    7. An, Li & Lupi, Frank & Liu, Jianguo & Linderman, Marc A. & Huang, Jinyan, 2002. "Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity: Implications for giant panda habitat conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 445-457, September.
    8. Masera, Omar R. & Saatkamp, Barbara D. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2000. "From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2083-2103, December.
    9. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2014. "The impact of the household decision environment on fuel choice behavior," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 236-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muller, Christophe & Yan, Huijie, 2018. "Household fuel use in developing countries: Review of theory and evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 429-439.
    2. Stabridis, Omar & van Gameren, Edwin, 2018. "Exposure to firewood: Consequences for health and labor force participation in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 382-395.
    3. Thapa, Samir & Morrison, Mark & Parton, Kevin A, 2021. "Willingness to pay for domestic biogas plants and distributing carbon revenues to influence their purchase: A case study in Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Harrington, Elise & Athavankar, Ameya & Hsu, David, 2020. "Variation in rural household energy transitions for basic lighting in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. John Eakins & Bernadette Power & Gordon Sirr, 2024. "An Analysis of Households Choice of Solid Fuels as a Primary and Supplementary Heating Fuel," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(2), pages 91-109, March.
    6. Christophe Muller & Huijie Yan, 2018. "Household Fuel Use in Rural China," AMSE Working Papers 1808, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    7. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter & Marenya, Paswel, 2017. "A ladder within a ladder: Understanding the factors influencing a household's domestic use of electricity in four African countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 167-181.
    8. Liu, Ziming & Li, Jia & Rommel, Jens & Feng, Shuyi, 2020. "Health impacts of cooking fuel choice in rural China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Gould, Carlos F. & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2018. "LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 395-408.
    10. Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Le Roux, Leonard, 2019. "Stacking up the ladder: A panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 222-235.
    11. Jeuland, M.A. & Bhojvaid, V. & Kar, A. & Lewis, J.J. & Patange, O. & Pattanayak, S.K. & Ramanathan, N. & Rehman, I.H. & Tan Soo, J.S. & Ramanathan, V., 2015. "Preferences for improved cook stoves: Evidence from rural villages in north India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 287-298.
    12. Alananga, Samwel Sanga & Igangula, Nurdin Husama, 2022. "Constrained cooking energy choices: Understanding up-the-ladder stacking behaviour in Dar es Salaam Tanzania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Chang, Huayi & Zhang, Junbiao & He, Ke & Zeng, Yangmei, 2020. "Impact of off-farm employment on household clean energy consumption in rural China: A gender perspective," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304259, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Behera, Bhagirath & Ali, Akhter, 2017. "Factors determining household use of clean and renewable energy sources for lighting in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 661-672.
    15. Aziz, Shakila & Chowdhury, Shahriar Ahmed, 2021. "Determinants of off-grid electrification choice and expenditure: Evidence from Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Nawaz, Saima & Iqbal, Nasir, 2020. "The impact of unconditional cash transfer on fuel choices among ultra-poor in Pakistan: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Benazir Income Support Program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Koirala, Dhiroj Prasad & Acharya, Bikram, 2022. "Households’ fuel choices in the context of a decade-long load-shedding problem in Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhu, Zheng & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Ping, 2022. "The determinants of energy choice for household cooking in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Ma, Shaoyue & Man, Hecheng & Li, Xiao & Xu, Xiangbo & Sun, Mingxing & Xie, Minghui & Zhang, Linxiu, 2023. "How nonfarm employment drives the households’ energy transition: Evidence from rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    20. Acharya, Bikram & Adhikari, Santosh, 2021. "Household energy consumption and adaptation behavior during crisis: Evidence from Indian economic blockade on Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Air pollution; energy transition; regression analysis; residential heating; government policy.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:4:p:771-784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.