IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vxy2022i4p55-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Would Investing in Equities Have Affected the Social Security Investment Fund in an Emerging Market? Can Governance Help?

Author

Listed:
  • Maen F. Nsour
  • Ph.D.
  • Samer AM Al-Rjoub
  • Ph.D.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores the impact of the Social Security Investment Fund's (SSIF) portfolio diversification into private securities in Jordan. However, the policy shift exposes the program to higher financial risk. Design/methodology/approach: It extends to examine whether corporate governance can be related to better performance and can be used as an additional selection criterion for sound investment decisions. SSIF is the largest fund in Jordan, with a market value of 14.5 billion dollars as of 2019. SSIF believes that investing a portion of its assets in equities would likely reduce the need for higher payroll taxes and strengthen the program's long-term financial outlook. Findings: Investment and long-term asset values can move in opposite directions. Constructing the first Corporate Governance Index (CGI) for Jordan's firms, we document a negative relationship between CGI and portfolio performance. Asset selection increases portfolio return while at the same time, lower the governance level of the selected stock portfolio. This result is in line with prior empirical research, which also demonstrated that the lower the governance standards, the stronger the correlation between governance and firm value and performance. Practical inplementation: Investing a portion of trust fund assets in equities would likely reduce the need for higher payroll taxes and strengthen the program's long-term financial outlook. Originality value: Social security trust fund's policy shift towards more equity investment reduces the aggregate capital stock and exposes future generations to more uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Maen F. Nsour & Ph.D. & Samer AM Al-Rjoub & Ph.D., 2022. "How Would Investing in Equities Have Affected the Social Security Investment Fund in an Emerging Market? Can Governance Help?," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 55-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:x:y:2022:i:4:p:55-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijeba.com/journal/787/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elton, Edwin J. & Gruber, Martin J. & Padberg, Manfred W., 1977. "Simple Rules for Optimal Portfolio Selection: The Multi Group Case," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 329-345, September.
    2. Black, Bernard S. & de Carvalho, Antonio Gledson & Gorga, Érica, 2012. "What matters and for which firms for corporate governance in emerging markets? Evidence from Brazil (and other BRIK countries)," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 934-952.
    3. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    4. Pestieau, Pierre & Possen, Uri M., 2000. "Investing Social Security in the Equity Market. Does it Make a Difference?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 1), pages 41-58, March.
    5. Christian E. Weller, 2000. "Risky business? Evaluating market risk of equity investment proposals to reform social security," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 263-273.
    6. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J & Padberg, Manfred W, 1976. "Simple Criteria for Optimal Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 31(5), pages 1341-1357, December.
    7. Pestieau, Pierre & Possen, Uri M., 2000. "Investing Social Security in the Equity Market. Does It Make a Difference?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(1), pages 41-58, March.
    8. PESTIEAU, Pierre & POSSEN, Uri M., 2000. "Investing social security in the equity market. Does it make a difference?," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1444, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Peter Diamond & John Geanakoplos, 2003. "Social Security Investment in Equities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1047-1074, September.
    10. John Sabelhaus, 2005. "Alternative Methods for Projecting Equity Returns: Implications for Evaluating Social Security Reform Proposals," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-63, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahim, M. Shahid & Mathur, Ike & ap Gwilym, Rhys, 2014. "Integrating corporate ownership and pension fund structures: A general equilibrium approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 553-569.
    2. Börsch-Supan, A. & Härtl, K. & Leite, D.N., 2016. "Social Security and Public Insurance," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 781-863, Elsevier.
    3. Börsch-Supan, Axel, 2002. "A Blue Print For Germany’s Pension Reform," MEA discussion paper series 02002, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    4. PESTIEAU, Pierre & POSSEN, Uri, 2000. "Macroeconomic implications of switching the social security trust fund towards a greater investment in equities," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2000035, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Elton, Edwin J. & Gruber, Martin J., 1997. "Modern portfolio theory, 1950 to date," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(11-12), pages 1743-1759, December.
    6. Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal & André L. Carvalhal & Ana Paula Iervolino, 2015. "One Decade of Evolution of Corporate Governance Practices in Brazil," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 13(1), pages 134-161.
    7. Elnahass, Marwa & Salama, Aly & Trinh, Vu Quang, 2022. "Firm valuations and board compensation: Evidence from alternative banking models," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    8. Michael Senescall & Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2024. "Quantitative Portfolio Management: Review and Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "The Blockchain Risk Parity Line: Moving From The Efficient Frontier To The Final Frontier Of Investments," Papers 2407.09536, arXiv.org.
    10. Luminita Enache & Khaled Hussainey, 2020. "The substitutive relation between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in their effects on firm performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 413-445, February.
    11. Miranda Tanjung, 2020. "A cross-firm analysis of corporate governance compliance and performance in Indonesia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(5), pages 621-643, February.
    12. González, Maximiliano & Guzmán, Alexander & Téllez, Diego Fernando & Trujillo, María Andrea, 2021. "What you say and how you say it: Information disclosure in Latin American firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 427-443.
    13. Marwa Elnahass & Kamil Omoteso & Aly Salama & Vu Quang Trinh, 2020. "Differential market valuations of board busyness across alternative banking models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 201-238, July.
    14. Flávia S. Maranho & Patrícia M. Bortolon & Ricardo P. C. Leal, 2020. "The firm–investor level characteristics of institutional investor engagement in Brazil," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 267-281, December.
    15. Richard C. Burgess & Roger P. Bey, 1988. "Optimal Portfolios: Markowitz Full Covariance Versus Simple Selection Rules," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 11(2), pages 153-163, June.
    16. Black, Bernard & de Carvalho, Antonio Gledson & Khanna, Vikramaditya & Kim, Woochan & Yurtoglu, Burcin, 2014. "Methods for multicountry studies of corporate governance: Evidence from the BRIKT countries," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 230-240.
    17. Kwan, Clarence C. Y., 1995. "Optimal portfolio selection under institutional procedures for short selling," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 871-889, August.
    18. Yi‐Hui Tai & Nen‐Chen Richard Hwang, 2020. "Market Reactions to Corporate Governance Ranking Announcements: Evidence from Taiwan," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 627-648, December.
    19. Isac Freitas Brandão & Vicente Crisóstomo & Félix J. López-Iturriaga, 2024. "A multidimensional analysis of corporate governance and firm value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 985-1016, December.
    20. Sankaran, Jayaram K. & Patil, Ajay A., 1999. "On the optimal selection of portfolios under limited diversification," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 1655-1666, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Diversification; long-term financial outlook; financial risk; corporate governance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:x:y:2022:i:4:p:55-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.