IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration Through Participation Introductory Notes to the Study of Administrative Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Trondal, Jarle

Abstract

When aiming at studying the interconnectedness of administrative systems and in particular the integration of domestic governance systems and the institutions of the European Union at least two variables are important to address: (i) the intensity and frequency of cross-level interaction and participation amongst the members of these systems, and (ii) the principles of organization being uppermost at both levels of governance. This article argues that in order to measure administrative integration, particular emphasis should be attached to the way these variables impact upon the organization members individually. Put more precisely, I argue that studies of administrative integration should analyse how and why cross-level participation foster changes in the identities, role conceptions and modes of acting amongst the organization members of these systems of governance. When aiming at accounting for these processes, this article stresses the effects of primary and secondary institutional affiliations, and the dynamics stemming from the degree of compatibility between the two. Processes of administrative integration are fuelled by high degree of cross-level compatibility in organizational structures, and secondly, by the sheer intensity and length of cross-level participation. Thirdly, I argue that administrative systems being organized according to the principle of purpose foster administrative integration more strongly than administrative systems organized according to the principles of area. Hence, I argue that the EU Commission is more likely to foster administrative integration across levels of governance than the Council of Ministers.

Suggested Citation

  • Trondal, Jarle, 1999. "Integration Through Participation Introductory Notes to the Study of Administrative Integration," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 3, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-004a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-004.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/1999-004.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beyers, Jan, 1998. "Where does supranationalism come from? Ideas floating through the working groups of the Council of the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, November.
    2. Scheinman, Lawrence, 1966. "Some Preliminary Notes on Bureaucratic Relationships in the European Economic Community," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 750-773, October.
    3. Bartolini, S., 1998. "exit Option, Boundary Building, Political Structuring," Papers 98/1, European Institute - Political and Social Sciences.
    4. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 427-460, July.
    5. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1997. "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 513-553, October.
    6. -, 1986. "Agenda = Agenda," Series Históricas 8749, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaclav Vlcek, 2023. "Who cares about the UN General Assembly? National delegations size from 1993 to 2016," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 349-360, May.
    2. Jeffry Frieden & Stefanie Walter, 2019. "Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 134-151, March.
    3. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Games Real Actors Could Play: The Challenge of Complexity," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 277-304, July.
    4. Alasdair R. Young, 2001. "Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the 'New' International Trade Agenda," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 12, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    5. Remi Maier-Rigaud, 2008. "International Organizations as Corporate Actors: Agency and Emergence in Theories of International Relations," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    6. ., 2013. "The dynamics of global governance," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 2, pages 38-59, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Betz, Joachim & Hanif, Melanie, 2010. "The Formation of Preferences in Two-level Games: An Analysis of India's Domestic and Foreign Energy Policy," GIGA Working Papers 142, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Stephen, Matthew D. & Parízek, Michal, 2019. "New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(6), pages 735-758.
    9. Coban, Mehmet Kerem, 2019. "Compliance forces, domestic policy process, and international regulatory standards: Compliance with Basel III," OSF Preprints x32nw, Center for Open Science.
    10. Christopher R. Dittmeier, 2013. "Proliferation, preemption, and intervention in the nuclearization of second-tier states," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 25(4), pages 492-525, October.
    11. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    12. Jeffrey T. Checkel & Andrew Moravcsik, 2001. "A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies?," European Union Politics, , vol. 2(2), pages 219-249, June.
    13. M. H. Austgulen, 2020. "Understanding National Preferences in EU Consumer Policy: A Regime Approach," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 767-798, December.
    14. Agnes Katalin Koos & Kenneth Keulman, 2019. "Methodological Nationalism in Global Studies and Beyond," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Anna Lanoszka, 2016. "Brazil’s Challenges of Post-interventionist Bargaining," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 8(1), pages 60-78, January.
    16. Debre, Maria J & Sommerer, Thomas, 2023. "Weathering the Storm? The Third Wave of Autocratization and International Organization Membership," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt7g9450nx, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    17. Schenoni, Luis Leandro, 2016. "Regional Power Transitions: Lessons from the Southern Cone," GIGA Working Papers 293, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    18. David Lake, 2009. "Open economy politics: A critical review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 219-244, September.
    19. Octavia MOISE, 2015. "The Impact Of Eu Conditionality In The Western Balkans. A Comparative Approach: Bosnia And Herzegovina – Bulgaria," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19.
    20. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.