IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/v63y2014i3p324-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A manufacturing systems network model for the evaluation of complex manufacturing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Till Becker
  • Mirja Meyer
  • Katja Windt

Abstract

Purpose - – The topology of manufacturing systems is specified during the design phase and can afterwards only be adjusted at high expense. The purpose of this paper is to exploit the availability of large-scale data sets in manufacturing by applying measures from complex network theory and from classical performance evaluation to investigate the relation between structure and performance. Design/methodology/approach - – The paper develops a manufacturing system network model that is composed of measures from complex network theory. The analysis is based on six company data sets containing up to half a million operation records. The paper uses the network model as a straightforward approach to assess the manufacturing systems and to evaluate the impact of topological measures on fundamental performance figures, e.g., work in process or lateness. Findings - – The paper able to show that the manufacturing systems network model is a low-effort approach to quickly assess a manufacturing system. Additionally, the paper demonstrates that manufacturing networks display distinct, non-random network characteristics on a network-wide scale and that the relations between topological and performance key figures are non-linear. Research limitations/implications - – The sample consists of six data sets from Germany-based manufacturing companies. As the model is universal, it can easily be applied to further data sets from any industry. Practical implications - – The model can be utilized to quickly analyze large data sets without employing classical methods (e.g. simulation studies) which require time-intensive modeling and execution. Originality/value - – This paper explores for the first time the application of network figures in manufacturing systems in relation to performance figures by using real data from manufacturing companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Till Becker & Mirja Meyer & Katja Windt, 2014. "A manufacturing systems network model for the evaluation of complex manufacturing systems," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(3), pages 324-340, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:63:y:2014:i:3:p:324-340
    DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0047/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0047/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirja Meyer & Marc-Thorsten Hütt & Julia Bendul, 2016. "The elementary flux modes of a manufacturing system: a novel approach to explore the relationship of network structure and function," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4145-4160, July.
    2. Kozjek, Dominik & Vrabič, Rok & Eržen, Gregor & Butala, Peter, 2018. "Identifying the business and social networks in the domain of production by merging the data from heterogeneous internet sources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 181-191.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:63:y:2014:i:3:p:324-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.