IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejssjr/v9y2021i2p89-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluation of Preventive Healthcare: A Cost Benefit Analysis of a Parenting Program

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Ponikvar

    (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Marija Anderluh

    (Department for Child Psychiatry of the Division for Paediatrics in Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Eva Strmljan Kreslin

    (Mala ulica Family Centre, Slovenia)

  • Mojca Marc

    (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The positive impact of parenting programs on the health and wellbeing of individuals and their immediate community has been confirmed in many studies. Often, and especially during the Covid-19 pandemics, prevention health programs are stalled due to other policy priorities. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) can be used for the economic evaluation of public health programs to support evidence-based health policies and allows the comparison of the monetized effects of programs across different societal domains. However, CBA requires a variety of data that are typically difficult to obtain. Using the Incredible Years (IY) parenting program case, we illustrate how CBA can be practically applied. For parenting programs, the positive effects arise exclusively in non-monetary form as benefits arising from avoiding adverse effects in society. We show how to monetize them by estimating the avoided costs of healthcare, educational, and other societal costs due to the program's implementation. At a 4% social discount rate, the economic net present value is positive and high, showing that the present value of the program's benefits exceeds the costs of the program by almost €800 thousand. The benefit-to-cost index of 5.6 confirms that every € invested in the program brings benefits of €5.6 in monetary terms. Cost-benefit analysis provides a convincing foundation for distributing public funds as it allows for a comparison of field-related programs and programs from different fields. Consequently, they increase any public policy's effectiveness and efficiency, but especially preventive health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Ponikvar & Marija Anderluh & Eva Strmljan Kreslin & Mojca Marc, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Preventive Healthcare: A Cost Benefit Analysis of a Parenting Program," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(2), pages 89-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:89-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EJSS-9.2.3.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long Khanh-Dao Le & Adrian Cuevas Esturas & Cathrine Mihalopoulos & Oxana Chiotelis & Jessica Bucholc & Mary Lou Chatterton & Lidia Engel, 2021. "Cost-effectiveness evidence of mental health prevention and promotion interventions: A systematic review of economic evaluations," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Volker Then & Christian Schober & Olivia Rauscher & Konstantin Kehl, 2017. "Social Return on Investment Analysis," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-71401-1, June.
    3. Richard O. Zerbe Jr & Allen S. Bellas, 2006. "A Primer for Benefit–Cost Analysis," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3480.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Just, Richard E. & Schmitz, Andrew & Zerbe, Richard O., 2012. "Scitovsky Reversals and Practical Benefit-Cost Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Bénédicte Rulleau & Jeoffrey Dehez & Patrick Point & Dominique Ami & Olivier Chanel, 2009. "Approche multidimensionnelle de la valeur économique des loisirs de nature, suivi d'un commentaire de Dominique Ami et Olivier Chanel," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 421(1), pages 29-51.
    4. repec:zbw:rwimat:048 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Richard O. Zerbe, 2013. "Ethical benefit–cost analysis as art and science: ten rules for benefit–cost analysis," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 8, pages 264-293, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Jonathan Hussels & Ralph Richter & Suntje Schmidt, 2024. "The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Kokoski Mary, 2010. "Getting Real: Price Deflation of Nominal Values," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Demirbugan, Alper, 2019. "Changes in ecosystem service benefit in Soma lignite region of Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Tiwari, Sweta & Coble, Keith & Harri, Ardian & Barnett, Barry, 2017. "Hedging the Price Risk of Crop Revenue Insurance Through the Options Market," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 253081, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Vitaliano Donald F., 2012. "An Empirical Estimate of the Labor Response Function for Benefit-Cost Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Yoram Krozer & Frans Coenen & Jenica Hanganu & Maia Lordkipanidze & Madalina Sbarcea, 2020. "Towards Innovative Governance of Nature Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Rothgang, Michael & Lageman, Bernhard & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Friedrich, Werner & Dehio, Jochen & Dürig, Wolfgang & Eckl, Verena & Körbel, Markus & Peistrup, Mathias & Seidel, Stefan, 2008. "Das Programm zur Förderung der industriellen Gemeinschaftsforschung: Zwischenbilanz der erweiterten Erfolgskontrolle," RWI Materialien 48, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    13. Michael Rothgang & Bernhard Lagemann & Christoph M. Schmidt & Werner Friedrich & Jochen Dehio & Wolfgang Dürig & Verena Eckl & Markus Körbel & Mathias Peistrup & Stefan Seidel, 2008. "Das Programm zur Förderung der Industriellen Gemeinschaftsforschung – Zwischenbilanz der erweiterten Erfolgskontrolle," RWI Materialien, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, pages 138, December.
    14. Richard O. Zerbe & Robert D. Plotnick & Ronald C. Kessler & Peter J. Pecora & Eva Hiripi & Kirk O’Brien & Jason Williams & Diana English & James White, 2009. "Benefits And Costs Of Intensive Foster Care Services: The Casey Family Programs Compared To State Services," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 27(3), pages 308-320, July.
    15. Bellucci, Marco & Biggeri, Mario & Nitti, Carmela & Terenzi, Linda, 2023. "Accounting for disability and work inclusion in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Rachael Taylor & Deborah Sullivan & Penny Reeves & Nicola Kerr & Amy Sawyer & Emma Schwartzkoff & Andrew Bailey & Christopher Williams & Alexis Hure, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations to Inform the Reorientation of Preventive Health Services in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-47, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:89-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.