IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eip/journl/y2021i4p53-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Approaches To Improving Carbon Dioxid Taxation In Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksiy RIABCHYN
  • Nadiia NOVYTSKA
  • Inna KHLIEBNIKOVA

Abstract

The domestic carbon tax needs to improve tax administration to ensure its fiscal efficiency and reduce transaction costs for tax compliance. Despite the fact that in the Tax Code of Ukraine the calculation of such a tax is based on the actual indicators of CO2 emissions, in practice it is based on the amount of resources consumed and the characteristics of the production process. Accordingly, the difficulties in administering this tax are the complexity of tax audits and the need to involve environmental experts. All this does not allow to adhere to the principle of cost-effectiveness of taxation and highlights the need to find opportunities to simplify the process of tax administration on the basis of world best practices. The purpose of the article is to outline conceptual approaches to improving carbon taxation, which will allow Ukraine to simplify tax administration and together with the EU to effectively combat the effects of climate change in order to increase security and create new opportunities for Ukrainian business under the European Green Deal. The methodological basis of the study was the use of a set of general and special methods: generalizations and scientific abstraction, historical and logical, extrapolations, spatial and graphical and tabular methods of visualization. The application of the SWOT analysis method and the systematization of European practice revealed that the most acceptable for Ukraine is the use of tax on CO2 emissions in the form of an indirect tax on energy consumption. Coefficients of carbon content in fuel, calorific value of fuel and its oxidation factor were used to convert the emission base carbon tax into the fuel base carbon tax. The implementation of these proposals will help increase the efficiency of administration of such a tax, as it will: 1) reduce the number of taxpayers through the introduction of the institution of tax agents while increasing the amount of tax paid by one taxpayer; 2) simplify the procedure for calculating the tax base by taxpayers and employees of tax authorities; 3) increase the fiscal efficiency of the environmental tax on carbon dioxide emissions from stationary sources by 50% in the case of setting the CO2 price at UAH 10 per ton (5-fold when setting the CO2 price at UAH 30 per ton in accordance with the proposals of the bill No 5600) and to attract potential revenues from the transport sector in the amount of 0.06% of GDP. The use of practical proposals and recommendations obtained in the article will increase the effectiveness of Ukraine's tax policy by forming a set of measures which will reduce the energy dependence of the national economy, including through incentives for energy-saving and climate-neutral technologies, reduce the burden on the environment, and will help simplify the administration of environmental taxes while increasing their fiscal efficiency. Research materials can be used in the preparation of draft regulations and policy documents in the field of environmental and excise taxation, which is within the competence of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, as well as in the formation of proposals, reservations and recommendations to other regulations on improving environmental and excise taxation initiated both by the authorities of the executive power of Ukraine, and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on improving environmental and excise taxation. The theoretical results are the development of a general theory of fiscal administration for environmental and excise taxation

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksiy RIABCHYN & Nadiia NOVYTSKA & Inna KHLIEBNIKOVA, 2021. "Conceptual Approaches To Improving Carbon Dioxid Taxation In Ukraine," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 4, pages 53-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:eip:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:53-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eip.org.ua/docs/EP_21_4_53_uk.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hoel, 1998. "Emission Taxes versus Other Environmental Policies," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 79-104, March.
    2. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul Baki, Ghina & Marrouch, Walid, 2022. "Environmental taxation in the Bertrand differentiated duopoly: New insights," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Juan Carlos Bárcena‐Ruiz & María Begoña Garzón, 2022. "Environmental policy instruments and ownership of firms," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 90(4), pages 385-408, July.
    3. Baldursson, Fridrik M. & von der Fehr, Nils-Henrik M., 2008. "Prices vs. quantities: Public finance and the choice of regulatory instruments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1242-1255, October.
    4. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Salant, Stephen W., 2011. "A free lunch in the commons," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 245-253, May.
    5. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    6. Yu-Bong Lai, 2004. "Trade liberalization, consumption externalities and the environment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9.
    7. Ni, Jinlan & Wei, Chu & Du, Limin, 2015. "Revealing the political decision toward Chinese carbon abatement: Based on equity and efficiency criteria," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 609-621.
    8. Vidar Christiansen & Stephen Smith, 2009. "Externality-correcting Taxes and Regulation," CESifo Working Paper Series 2793, CESifo.
    9. Giancarlo Giudici & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2019. "The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 815-830, April.
    10. Grüll, Georg & Taschini, Luca, 2011. "Cap-and-trade properties under different hybrid scheme designs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 107-118, January.
    11. Na Li Dawson & Kathleen Segerson, 2008. "Voluntary Agreements with Industries: Participation Incentives with Industry-Wide Targets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 97-114.
    12. Sam Fankhauser & Cameron Hepburn, 2009. "Carbon markets in space and time," GRI Working Papers 3, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    13. Ehigiamusoe, Kizito Uyi & Lean, Hooi Hooi & Smyth, Russell, 2020. "The moderating role of energy consumption in the carbon emissions-income nexus in middle-income countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Joseph E. Aldy & William A. Pizer, 2009. "Issues in Designing U.S. Climate Change Policy," The Energy Journal, , vol. 30(3), pages 179-210, July.
    15. Thomas Akpan Harry & Ekemini John Peter & Nsidibe Akpan Udoduk, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment Of Oil Producing Communities In Part Of The Niger Delta. A Case Study Of Ibeno, Ikot Abasi, Onna And Esit-Eket Local Government Area In Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria," Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 49-56, April.
    16. Stavins, Robert, 2001. "Lessons From the American Experiment With Market-Based Environmental Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-53, Resources for the Future.
    17. Wu, JunJie & Zilberman, David & Babcock, Bruce A., 2001. "Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 333-350, May.
    18. Boisvert, Richard N. & Peterson, Jeffrey M., 1996. "Conditions for Requiring Separate Green Payments Policies Under Asymmetric Information," Working Papers 127934, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    19. Janusch, Nicholas, 2016. "A note on the distortionary effects of revenue-neutral tolls in a bottleneck congestion game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 95-103.
    20. Berta, Nathalie, 2015. "Prix versus quantités : les contorsions du marché du carbone européen," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eip:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Bazhal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://eip.org.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.