IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eej/eeconj/v16y1990i1p9-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurship and Resource Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Carl P. Kaiser

    (Washington & Lee University)

Abstract

Historical surveys show that most analyses of the entrepreneur focus primarily upon one aspect or function of entrepreneurship such as risk-bearing, innovation, or the perception of and response to market disequilibria. Despite the richness of entrepreneurial theory over the last two hundred years, economists have yet to adequately model the market for entrepreneurship. The analysis in this paper implies a supply of entrepreneurial expenditures function, that when coupled with a concept of the demand for entrepreneurial expenditures, yields a market model of the entrepreneurial process. The model is significant in three important ways; first, it synthesizes the different but complementary elements of entrepreneurial behavior that have been separately developed in the received literature, second, it explains how market forces drive an economy toward an efficient allocation of entrepreneurial resources, and third, it provides a framework for considering and analyzing policy actions to stimulate entrepreneurial activity and economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl P. Kaiser, 1990. "Entrepreneurship and Resource Allocation," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 9-20, Jan-Mar.
    • Handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:16:y:1990:i:1:p:9-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/Volume16/V16N1P9_20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Shapiro, 1986. "Innovation, New Industries and New Firms," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 27-43, Jan-Mar.
    2. Ziegler, Charles A., 1985. "Innovation and the imitative entrepreneur," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 103-121, June.
    3. S. M. Kanbur, 1980. "A Note on Risk Taking, Entrepreneurship, and Schumpeter," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 489-498, Winter.
    4. repec:bla:scandj:v:82:y:1980:i:4:p:437-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kamien,Morton I. & Schwartz,Nancy L., 1982. "Market Structure and Innovation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521293853, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José M. Menudo & José Mª O’Kean, 2014. "The Market for Entrepreneurs: The Story of a Failure," Working Papers 14.09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    2. Jun Sun & Yongchun Huang & Dejin Su & Chen Yang, 2020. "Data mining and analysis of part-time entrepreneurs from the perspective of entrepreneurial ability," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 455-484, September.
    3. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herrmann, Roland & Schröck, Rebecca, 2011. "Determinanten des Innovationserfolgs: eine Analyse mit Scannerdaten für den deutschen Joghurtmarkt," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(03), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.
    3. Helen Weeds, 2002. "Strategic Delay in a Real Options Model of R&D Competition," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(3), pages 729-747.
    4. Symeonidis, George, 2001. "Price Competition, Innovation and Profitability: Theory and UK Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 2816, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    6. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    7. Park, Walter G., 1997. "A note on innovation and patent protection: Intertemporal imitation-risk smoothing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 185-189, February.
    8. Bertrand, Olivier & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2006. "R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 401-423, March.
    9. Xiding Chen & Qinghua Huang & Weilun Huang & Xue Li, 2018. "The Impact of Sustainable Development Technology on a Small Economy—The Case of Energy-Saving Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, February.
    10. Colombo, Massimo G. & Garrone, Paola, 1998. "Common carriers' entry into multimedia services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105, March.
    11. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:12:y:2008:i:5:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Marin, Dalia, 1992. "Is the Export-Led.Growth Hypothesis Valid for Industrialized Countries?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(4), pages 678-688, November.
    13. Salvacruz, Joseph C., 1996. "Competitiveness Of The United States And The Asean In The International Agricultural Market," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2000. "Market Entry Strategy Under Firm Heterogeneity and Asymmetric Payoffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 313-327, November.
    15. Kumar, Nagesh & Saqib, Mohammed, 1996. "Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R & D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 713-722, August.
    16. Petrakis, Panagiotis E. & Kostis, Pantelis C. & Valsamis, Dionysis G., 2015. "Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1436-1438.
    17. Stam, Wouter, 2009. "When does community participation enhance the performance of open source software companies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1288-1299, October.
    18. S. Luckraz, 2008. "Process Spillovers and Growth," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 315-335, November.
    19. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2012. "Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, July.
    20. Gopinath Munisamy & Pick Daniel & Li Yonghai, 2003. "Concentration and Innovation in the U.S. Food Industries," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-23, August.
    21. Rajshree Agarwal & Barry L. Bayus, 2002. "The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1024-1041, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:16:y:1990:i:1:p:9-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa1ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.