IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v142y2021ics0305750x21000395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability superheroes? For-profit narratives of “doing good” in the era of the SDGs

Author

Listed:
  • Olwig, Mette Fog

Abstract

As a consequence of the UN’s promulgation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the concept of development is being redefined and revitalized. Development is being turned into “doing good” by anyone and anywhere, and relevant for everyone and everywhere. Furthermore, business has been bestowed with a significant role in this process. What are the consequences for imagining and practicing development when development has been reconceptualized, operationalized and marketed by businesses? Drawing on text analysis and event ethnography at business conferences on sustainability held in a frontrunner SDG country, Denmark, this article identifies three key trends as for-profit narratives of doing good gain prominence. First, doing good is increasingly defined in terms of the SDGs, but businesses strategically emphasize specific goals, thereby compromising a more integrated substantive approach to sustainability grounded in the needs of those affected. Second, profit-making and doing good are often presented as symbiotic, and doing good as part of core business. The idea of transformational partnerships between for-profit and non-profit actors, resulting in organizational changes by all involved, is also part of this trend. This leads to a problematic blurring between the categories of for-profit and non-profit. Third, for-profit narratives of doing good are marketing business endeavors by invoking “nearby sustainability superheroes” (individuals, e.g., consumers or employees, performing heroically nearby). In contrast, non-profit narratives of doing good have traditionally justified interventions by evoking a “distant other in need” (a suffering, socially and geographically distant, individual or social group). The implication that the distant other is passively waiting to be saved is problematic, but so is encouraging individuals to put themselves into the picture as what can be termed “selfie-humanitarians.” By foregrounding their own reflection, these (apolitical) heroes can easily lose sight of the historical–geographical structural issues that perpetuate inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Olwig, Mette Fog, 2021. "Sustainability superheroes? For-profit narratives of “doing good” in the era of the SDGs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X21000395
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashman, Darcy, 2001. "Civil Society Collaboration with Business: Bringing Empowerment Back in," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1097-1113, July.
    2. Lena Brogaard & Ole Helby Petersen, 2018. "Public‐private partnerships (PPPs) in development policy: Exploring the concept and practice," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 729-747, September.
    3. Roberta Hawkins, 2012. "A New Frontier in Development? The use of cause-related marketing by international development organisations," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(10), pages 1783-1801.
    4. Sakiko Fukuda‐Parr & Desmond McNeill, 2019. "Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring the SDGs: Introduction to Special Issue," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(S1), pages 5-15, January.
    5. W. Neil Adger & Tor A. Benjaminsen & Katrina Brown & Hanne Svarstad, 2001. "Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 681-715, September.
    6. Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks & Emma Hughes, 2016. "The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual’," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 371-382, November.
    7. Dima Jamali & Tamar Keshishian, 2009. "Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships Between Businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 277-295, January.
    8. Pye, Oliver, 2019. "Commodifying sustainability: Development, nature and politics in the palm oil industry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 218-228.
    9. Roe, Emery M., 1991. "Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, April.
    10. Rosaleen Duffy, 2014. "Forum: What Does Collaborative Event Ethnography Tell Us About Global Environmental Governance?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(3), pages 125-131, August.
    11. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 247-254.
    12. Mark P. Dallas & Stefano Ponte & Timothy J. Sturgeon, 2019. "Power in global value chains," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 666-694, July.
    13. Mary Mostafanezhad, 2013. "‘Getting in Touch with your Inner Angelina’: celebrity humanitarianism and the cultural politics of gendered generosity in volunteer tourism," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 485-499.
    14. Lisa M. Campbell & Catherine Corson & Noella J. Gray & Kenneth I. MacDonald & Peter Brosius, 2014. "Introduction: Studying Global Environmental Meetings to Understand Global Environmental Governance: Collaborative Event Ethnography at the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biologic," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2018. "Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 208-233, December.
    16. Mette F Olwig, 2013. "Beyond Translation: Reconceptualizing the Role of Local Practitioners and the Development ‘Interface’," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(3), pages 428-444, July.
    17. Uma Kothari, 2014. "Trade, consumption and development alliances: the historical legacy of the Empire Marketing Board poster campaign," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 43-64, January.
    18. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2019. "From International to Global Development: New Geographies of 21st Century Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 347-378, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budabin, Alexandra Cosima & Hudson, Natalie F., 2021. "Sisterhood partnerships for conflict-related sexual violence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Chiara Mio & Silvia Panfilo & Benedetta Blundo, 2020. "Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3220-3245, December.
    3. Kyoko Sasaki & Wendy Stubbs & Megan Farrelly, 2023. "The relationship between corporate purpose and the sustainable development goals in large Japanese companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2475-2489, September.
    4. Theresa Gehringer, 2020. "Corporate Foundations as Partnership Brokers in Supporting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Richey, Lisa Ann & Ponte, Stefano, 2021. "Brand Aid and coffee value chain development interventions: Is Starbucks working aid out of business?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    7. Jose Ignacio Galan & Jose Angel Zuñiga‐Vicente, 2023. "Discovering the key factors behind multi‐stakeholder partnerships for contributing to the achievement of sustainable development goals: Insights around the electric vehicle in Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 829-845, March.
    8. Ferran Curtó-Pagès & Enrique Ortega-Rivera & Marc Castellón-Durán & Eva Jané-Llopis, 2021. "Coming in from the Cold: A Longitudinal Analysis of SDG Reporting Practices by Spanish Listed Companies Since the Approval of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Elsa Diez-Busto & Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz & Ana Fernandez-Laviada, 2021. "The B Corp Movement: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Ana T. Ejarque & Vanessa Campos, 2020. "Assessing the Economy for the Common Good Measurement Theory Ability to Integrate the SDGs into MSMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Amanda Williams & Lara Anne Blasberg, 2022. "SDG Platforms as Strategic Innovation Through Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1041-1057, November.
    12. Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín, 2010. "Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 55-70, July.
    13. Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce & David Talbot, 2023. "Multinational enterprises' sustainability practices and focus on developing countries: Contributions and unexpected results of SDG implementation," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 201-232, March.
    14. Smith, Hannah & Discetti, Roberta & Bellucci, Marco & Acuti, Diletta, 2022. "SMEs engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: A power perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 112-122.
    15. Jarosław Wenancjusz Przybytniowski & Stanisław Borkowski & Andrzej Grzebieniak & Petro Garasyim & Paweł Dziekański & Anna Ciesielska, 2022. "Social, Economic, and Financial Aspects of Modelling Sustainable Growth in the Irresponsible World during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Agnes Pranugrahaning & Jerome Denis Donovan & Cheree Topple & Eryadi Kordi Masli, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Assessments in the Information Communication Technology Sector in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Kimitaka Nishitani & Akira Kawaguchi, 2022. "Mitigating Gender Inequality in the Workplace: Toward Sustainable Development Through Institutional Changes," Discussion Paper Series DP2022-07, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised May 2022.
    18. Gautam, Yograj, 2019. "“Food aid is killing Himalayan farms”. Debunking the false dependency narrative in Karnali, Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 54-65.
    19. James X. Zhan & Amelia U. Santos-Paulino, 2021. "Investing in the Sustainable Development Goals: Mobilization, channeling, and impact," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 166-183, March.
    20. Ogahara, Zoë & Jespersen, Kristjan & Theilade, Ida & Nielsen, Martin Reinhard, 2022. "Review of smallholder palm oil sustainability reveals limited positive impacts and identifies key implementation and knowledge gaps," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:142:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x21000395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.