IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v6y1999i2p123-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transport investment and regeneration. Sheffield: 1992-1997

Author

Listed:
  • Dabinett, G.
  • Gore, T.
  • Haywood, R.
  • Lawless, P.

Abstract

At both national and international scales there is increasing policy debate regarding the relationships between transport investment and regeneration. Little detailed empirical work has been undertaken at the local level. Sheffield, an English provincial city, witnessed substantial transport investment in the early to mid 1990s: notably the South Yorkshire Supertram and extensive new/improved roads. A longitudinal study undertaken between 1992 and 1997 examined the effects of this investment on investors and external agents, the local development industry, existing businesses, and households. Few positive findings emerged partly because of the lack of integration amongst, and between, transport providers and development agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dabinett, G. & Gore, T. & Haywood, R. & Lawless, P., 1999. "Transport investment and regeneration. Sheffield: 1992-1997," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 123-134, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:6:y:1999:i:2:p:123-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(99)00013-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel W. Immergluck, 1993. "The Role of Public Infrastructure in Urban Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 7(3), pages 310-318, August.
    2. Rietveld, Piet, 1994. "Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure supply," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 329-341, July.
    3. B J Linneker & N A Spence, 1992. "Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1137-1154, August.
    4. Townroe, Peter & Dabinett, Gordon, 1995. "The Evaluation of Public Transport Investments within Cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 29(2), pages 175-188, May.
    5. P Lawless & G Dabinett, 1995. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(7), pages 1029-1048, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pacheco-Raguz, Javier F., 2010. "Assessing the impacts of Light Rail Transit on urban land in Manila," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 113-138.
    2. Tricker, Reginald C., 2007. "Assessing cumulative environmental effects from major public transport projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 293-305, July.
    3. Metaxas, Theodore & Kallioras, Dimitris, 2004. "Medium size cities economic development and regional competitiveness: the case of Larissa – Volos dipole in Thessaly region of Greece," MPRA Paper 41122, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2004.
    4. D. Knowles, Richard & Ferbrache, Fiona, 2016. "Evaluation of wider economic impacts of light rail investment on cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 430-439.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Lawless & Tony Gore, 1999. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Case Study of Sheffield 1992-96," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 527-545, March.
    2. P Lawless & G Dabinett, 1995. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(7), pages 1029-1048, July.
    3. Aspa Gospodini, 2005. "Urban development, redevelopment and regeneration encouraged by transport infrastructure projects: The case study of 12 European cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(7), pages 1083-1111, October.
    4. P Lawless, 1999. "Transport Investment and Urban Regeneration in a Provincial City: Sheffield, 1992–96," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(2), pages 211-226, April.
    5. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    6. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    7. Bocarejo S., Juan Pablo & Oviedo H., Daniel Ricardo, 2012. "Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 142-154.
    8. Weber, Joe, 2017. "Continuity and change in American urban freeway networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 31-39.
    9. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Aurélie Mercier, 2013. "A combined people-freight accessibility approach for urban retailing and leisure planning at strategic level," Post-Print halshs-00919537, HAL.
    10. Michiel De Bok & Michiel Bliemer, 2005. "Using firm demographic microsimulation to evaluate land use and transport scenario evaluation - model calibration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p664, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos & Amaral, Julia C., 2024. "Assessment of freight accessibility in New York City: A spatial-temporal approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Wong, Sandy, 2018. "The limitations of using activity space measurements for representing the mobilities of individuals with visual impairment: A mixed methods case study in the San Francisco Bay Area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 300-308.
    13. Áron Kovács & András Bozóti & Zsuzsanna Pótó & Márta Bakucz, 2014. "Medicinal and Thermal Spas in South and West Transdanubia - The Significance of Accessibility," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 81-98, October.
    14. Frank Bruinsma & Sytze Rienstra & Piet Rietveld, 1997. "Economic Impacts of the Construction of a Transport Corridor: A Multi-level and Multiapproach Case Study for the Construction of the A1 Highway in the Netherlands," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 391-402.
    15. Rivera, Liliana & Sheffi, Yossi & Welsch, Roy, 2014. "Logistics agglomeration in the US," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 222-238.
    16. Chandra, Shailesh & Naik, R. Thirumaleswara & Venkatesh, Manoj & Mudgal, Abhisek, 2021. "Accessibility evaluations of the proposed road user charge (RUC) program in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-26.
    17. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Merk, Olaf & Tei, Alessio, 2013. "The impact of port throughput on local employment: Evidence from a panel of European regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 32-38.
    19. Ioannis Charalampidis & Panagiotis Karkatsoulis & Pantelis Capros, 2019. "A Regional Economy-Energy-Transport Model of the EU for Assessing Decarbonization in Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Ribeiro, Anabela & Antunes, António Pais & Páez, Antonio, 2010. "Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 125-132.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:6:y:1999:i:2:p:123-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.