Author
Listed:
- Yuan, Hang
- Zhao, Lei
- Yang, Hangjun
Abstract
This study evaluates China's environmental policies, specifically the increase of carbon emission tax rates and the reduction of carbon emission intensity, by developing a New Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (NK-DSGE) model that incorporates energy consumption and carbon emissions. The production sector is segmented into manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and transportation, with transportation services acting as inputs for both manufacturing and non-manufacturing firms. We construct four cases within two scenarios, each characterized by distinct targets and policies. After calibrating and estimating the relevant parameters, we compare carbon reduction outcomes and economic fluctuations across the two scenarios. Our findings indicate that when targeting the same carbon emission tax rate increase or carbon emission intensity ratio reduction, policies that increase the carbon emission tax rate or reduce carbon emission intensity implemented in the manufacturing sector achieve greater carbon emission reductions compared to the same polices implemented in the transportation sector. Meanwhile, compared to the latter case, output experienced a greater decline, and inflation exhibited a more substantial increase in the former case. However, when the quantities of carbon emission reductions are approximately the same in the first quarter, policies that increase the carbon emission tax rate or reduce carbon emission intensity enacted in the transportation sector demonstrate superior performance relative to the same polices implemented in the manufacturing sector. This leads to smaller final output reductions and milder inflation increases. In summary, for equivalent levels of carbon emission reductions, policies implemented in the transportation sector yield more favorable economic outcomes than those applied in the manufacturing sector.
Suggested Citation
Yuan, Hang & Zhao, Lei & Yang, Hangjun, 2025.
"Comparative analysis of carbon emission reduction policies in China's manufacturing and transportation sectors,"
Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 159-180.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:trapol:v:160:y:2025:i:c:p:159-180
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.005
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:160:y:2025:i:c:p:159-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.