IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v152y2024icp29-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the impact of low-speed limit zones' policy implications on cyclist safety: Evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Ekmekci, Mustafa
  • Dadashzadeh, Nima
  • Woods, Lee

Abstract

As part of the shift in policy to promote active travel, the UK's Manual for Streets (MfS) guidance proposed new approaches for priority intersections design in residential areas, promoting lower geometric visibilities for drivers on minor road arms to reduce collision severity, and the low-speed (i.e., 20 mph) limit zone policy. However, the relationship between speed, visibility, and collisions has not been explored comprehensively for these low-speed limit residential areas. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of shorter visibilities on vehicle-bicycle collisions at priority intersections in Portsmouth, UK. Using piecewise Structural Equations Modeling and Artificial Neural Network models, 120 locations in the city were analysed to understand the complex interplay between vehicles' speed, speed limits, visibilities, geometries, traffic flows, and collisions. The research question was whether shorter visibilities supported policy intentions by reducing bicycle collisions in low-speed limit areas, as MfS suggested. The results show that greater visibility 9 m back to left and right positively correlates with higher road traffic collisions. In comparison, greater left-hand visibility at 2.4 m back from minor arms has a counter-effect that improves safety. This supports the notion that shorter visibility in residential areas aid cyclist safety. This study contributes significantly to the literature by shedding light on the impact of shorter visibility on road safety. The findings have important implications for transportation policy and practice, highlighting the importance of the MfS approach for improving cyclist safety in the design of priority intersections.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekmekci, Mustafa & Dadashzadeh, Nima & Woods, Lee, 2024. "Assessing the impact of low-speed limit zones' policy implications on cyclist safety: Evidence from the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 29-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:152:y:2024:i:c:p:29-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.04.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24001173
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.04.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas, 2012. "The value of time and external benefits in bicycle appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 673-683.
    2. Chen, Chen & Wang, Haizhong & Roll, Josh & Nordback, Krista & Wang, Yinhai, 2020. "Using bicycle app data to develop Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) for bicyclists at intersections: A generic framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1034-1052.
    3. Feizi, Ahmad & Mastali, Majid & Van Houten, Ron & Kwigizile, Valerian & Oh, Jun-Seok, 2021. "Effects of bicycle passing distance law on drivers’ behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Börjesson, Maria & Fung, Chau Man & Proost, Stef & Yan, Zifei, 2018. "Do buses hinder cyclists or is it the other way around? Optimal bus fares, bus stops and cycling tolls," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 326-346.
    2. Paulsen, Mads & Rich, Jeppe, 2023. "Societally optimal expansion of bicycle networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. McArthur, David Philip & Hong, Jinhyun, 2019. "Visualising where commuting cyclists travel using crowdsourced data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 233-241.
    4. Alexander Bigazzi & Robin Lindsey, 2019. "A utility-based bicycle speed choice model with time and energy factors," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 995-1009, June.
    5. Lanzendorf, Martin & Busch-Geertsema, Annika, 2014. "The cycling boom in large German cities—Empirical evidence for successful cycling campaigns," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 26-33.
    6. Ralph Chapman & Michael Keall & Philippa Howden-Chapman & Mark Grams & Karen Witten & Edward Randal & Alistair Woodward, 2018. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Miroslav Vasilev & Ray Pritchard & Thomas Jonsson, 2018. "Trialing a Road Lane to Bicycle Path Redesign—Changes in Travel Behavior with a Focus on Users’ Route and Mode Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Björklund, Gunilla & Isacsson, Gunnar, 2013. "Forecasting the impact of infrastructure on Swedish commuters’ cycling behaviour," Working papers in Transport Economics 2013:36, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    9. Rossetti, Tomás & Broaddus, Andrea & Ruhl, Melissa & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Commuter preferences for a first-mile/last-mile microtransit service in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Klingen, Joris & van Ommeren, Jos, 2020. "Urban air pollution and time losses: Evidence from cyclists in London," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Fan, Zhufeng & Harper, Corey D., 2024. "Taking a multimodal approach to equitable bike share station siting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Dimitra Chondrogianni & Yorgos J. Stephanedes & Panoraia Fatourou, 2023. "Assessing Cycling Accessibility in Urban Areas through the Implementation of a New Cycling Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    13. van Wee, Bert & Börjesson, Maria, 2015. "How to make CBA more suitable for evaluating cycling policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 117-124.
    14. Chen, Chen & Wang, Haizhong & Roll, Josh & Nordback, Krista & Wang, Yinhai, 2020. "Using bicycle app data to develop Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) for bicyclists at intersections: A generic framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1034-1052.
    15. Michał Adam Kwiatkowski & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Jadwiga Biegańska, 2021. "Could It Be a Bike for Everyone? The Electric Bicycle in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Gernot Sieg, 2016. "Costs and benefits of a bicycle helmet law for Germany," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 935-949, September.
    17. Giagnorio, Mirko & Börjesson, Maria & D'Alfonso, Tiziana, 2024. "Introducing electric buses in urban areas: Effects on welfare, pricing, frequency, and public subsidies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Niek Mouter & Paul Koster & Thijs Dekker, 2019. "Participatory Value Evaluation versus Cost-Benefit Analysis: comparing recommendations in the context of urban mobility investments," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-046/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 27 Jan 2020.
    19. Liu, Chengxi & Tapani, Andreas & Kristoffersson, Ida & Rydergren, Clas & Jonsson, Daniel, 2020. "Development of a large-scale transport model with focus on cycling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 164-183.
    20. Chaloupka, Christine & Kölbl, Robert & Loibl, Wolfgang & Molitor, Romain & Nentwich, Michael & Peer, Stefanie & Risser, Ralf & Sammer, Gerd & Schützhofer, Bettina & Seibt, Claus, 2015. "Nachhaltige Mobilität aus sozioökonomischer Perspektive – Diskussionspapier der Arbeitsgruppe "Sozioökonomische Aspekte" der ÖAW-Kommission "Nachhaltige Mobilität" (ITA-manu," ITA manu:scripts 15_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:152:y:2024:i:c:p:29-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.