IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v113y2021icp37-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rail bonus: An empirical study onto relative valuation of railways in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Utsunomiya, Kiyohito
  • Shibayama, Takeru

Abstract

The roll of railways in rural areas is a subject of wide range of discussions. Cost benefit analysis (CBA) gives us some quantitative indicators to discuss it, while social benefits estimated through CBA are currently not comprehensive. Some studies have shown the existence of the rail bonus, which leads to people's preference of rail-based transportation to bus-based transportation. Others have made attempts to quantify option values (OV) and non-user values (NUV), which has been excluded from conventional CBA. It is difficult to apply those studies to practical issues. In this paper, using the contingent valuation method (CVM), an estimation of railways' additional relative values over buses in Austria, which are comparable and applicable to other cases, is made. The results show that premium rates obtained from the survey data from residents along two Austrian regional railways are around ten percent on average, which are similar to the results of prior researches in Japan. Those premium rates are recognized not only by frequent users but also by occasional users or non-users, which means that OV and NUV greatly contribute to the rail bonus. It is also found that the rail bonus could depend on geographical conditions, to some extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Utsunomiya, Kiyohito & Shibayama, Takeru, 2021. "Rail bonus: An empirical study onto relative valuation of railways in Austria," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 37-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:113:y:2021:i:c:p:37-45
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X19307139
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kottenhoff, Karl & Lindh, Christer, 1995. "The value and effects of introducing high standard train and bus concepts in Blekinge, Sweden," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 235-241, October.
    2. Utsunomiya, Kiyohito, 2018. "The value of local railways: An approach using the contingent valuation method," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 554-559.
    3. Laird, James & Geurs, Karst & Nash, Chris, 2009. "Option and non-use values and rail project appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 173-182, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drevs, Florian & Tscheulin, Dieter K. & Lindenmeier, Jörg & Renner, Simone, 2014. "Crowding-in or crowding out: An empirical analysis on the effect of subsidies on individual willingness-to-pay for public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 250-261.
    2. Jean-Philippe Meloche & Vincent Trotignon & François Vaillancourt, 2021. "Densification ou prolongement des réseaux de transport structurants ? Une recension des écrits sur les coûts et les bénéfices attendus," CIRANO Project Reports 2020rp-28, CIRANO.
    3. Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit, 2021. "On another track: Differing views of experts and politicians on rail investments in peripheral localities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Tsvetan G. Tsvetanov & Farhed A. Shah, 2012. "The Economics of Protection against Sea-Level Rise: An Application to Coastal Properties in Connecticut," Working Papers 10, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    5. Jaime Larumbe, 2021. "Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. del Mar Parra López, María & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "The added value of having multiple options to travel to. An explorative study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Shahin Shakibaei & Pelin Alpkokin, 2019. "Conflict Resolution in Competitive Liberalized Railway Market: Application of Game Theoretic Concepts," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Karen Lucas, 2012. "A critical assessment of accessibility planning for social inclusion," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 13, pages 228-242, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Mouter, Niek & Chorus, Caspar, 2016. "Value of time – A citizen perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 317-329.
    10. Johnson, Daniel & Jackson, James & Nash, Chris, 2013. "The wider value of rural rail provision," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 126-135.
    11. Dominika WOJTOWICZ & Michał WOLAŃSKI & Šukasz WIDŠA-DOMARADZKI, 2015. "The use of conjoint method for assessing the relevance of railway investments," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 10(1), pages 121-135, March.
    12. Xun Zheng & Tomio Miwa, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis on Residents’ Reservation Willingness for Bus Service Based on Option Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Jørgensen, Finn & Mathisen, Terje Andreas & Larsen, Berner, 2011. "Evaluating transport user benefits and social surplus in a transport market--The case of the Norwegian ferries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 76-84, January.
    14. Arthur Grimes, 2010. "The Economics of Infrastructure Investment: Beyond Simple Cost Benefit Analysis," Working Papers 10_05, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    15. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2009. "Inter-city bus scheduling under variable market share and uncertain market demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 178-192, February.
    16. Lee, Sunghoon & Burris, Mark W., 2018. "Estimating the Option Value of managed lanes," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 28-36.
    17. Utsunomiya, Kiyohito, 2018. "The value of local railways: An approach using the contingent valuation method," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 554-559.
    18. Utsunomiya, Kiyohito, 2020. "The impact of regional railways on travel behaviour and social capital," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Katrin Dziekan, 2008. "What do people know about their public transport options?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 519-538, July.
    20. van Wee, Bert & Börjesson, Maria, 2015. "How to make CBA more suitable for evaluating cycling policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 117-124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:113:y:2021:i:c:p:37-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.