IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v183y2024ics1366554524000437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ChatGPT-enabled two-stage auctions for electric vehicle battery recycling

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Jianghong
  • Ning, Yu
  • Wang, Zhaohua
  • Li, Guo
  • Xiu Xu, Su

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to create an advanced management system that seamlessly integrates ChatGPT, an intelligent chatbot, with a cutting-edge two-stage auctions model. This integration aims to optimize the recycling process of electric vehicle batteries, ensuring utmost efficiency. To gauge the effect of incorporating ChatGPT on participants' values, we introduce technology coefficient parameters, providing a deeper understanding of its impact. In the initial phase of the auction, a sophisticated platform or an impartial third-party appraisal firm is employed. Their task is to collect vital attribute information from potential sellers regarding the waste batteries. Subsequently, this information is carefully matched with interested buyers. To determine the appropriate number of buyers both before and after the auction, we introduce two innovative matching mechanisms. We propose the implementation of a pioneering one-sided affine VCG (Vickrey-Clarke-Groves) auction, which portrays the affine externality of buyers to other buyers, along with a weighted generalized second-price auction. Additionally, we introduce a ground-breaking mechanism known as weighted multi-unit trade reduction. This inventive process allows successful bidders from the first stage to actively participate in the subsequent auction. Within this paper, we develop auction allocation rules based on the interplay between winning sellers' supply and winning buyers' demand. The outcomes of our numerical studies demonstrate the efficacy of the two-stage auction method in addressing buyers' concerns regarding battery performance. Furthermore, we have found that the utilization of ChatGPT technology proves advantageous for both participants and the platform; if buyers have a positive affine externality on other buyers, then the platform's revenue will be reduced, while social welfare will increase. In the realm of incentive compatibility, individual rationality, and budget balancing, our proposed mechanism stands unwaveringly strong, having undergone rigorous scrutiny and demonstrating commendable performance in numerous numerical experiments. Lastly, we offer practical management insights for stakeholders in the battery recycling market. These invaluable insights are derived from our hands-on experience, providing a fresh perspective for industry managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Jianghong & Ning, Yu & Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Guo & Xiu Xu, Su, 2024. "ChatGPT-enabled two-stage auctions for electric vehicle battery recycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000437
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524000437
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Meng & Kong, Zhaojun, 2022. "A multi-attribute double auction and bargaining model for emergency material procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Hongbin Cai & J. Vernon Henderson & Qinghua Zhang, 2013. "China's land market auctions: evidence of corruption?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 44(3), pages 488-521, September.
    3. Zhang, Qi & Tang, Yanyan & Bunn, Derek & Li, Hailong & Li, Yaoming, 2021. "Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2023. "ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Gu, Huaying & Liu, Zhixue & Qing, Qiankai, 2017. "Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 579-589.
    6. Xuan Zhao & Benhong Peng & Chaoyu Zheng & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Closed-loop supply chain pricing strategy for electric vehicle batteries recycling in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7725-7752, June.
    7. Eva A. M. van Dis & Johan Bollen & Willem Zuidema & Robert van Rooij & Claudi L. Bockting, 2023. "ChatGPT: five priorities for research," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 224-226, February.
    8. Ding, Xiaoshu & Qi, Qi & Jian, Sisi & Yang, Hai, 2023. "Mechanism design for Mobility-as-a-Service platform considering travelers’ strategic behavior and multidimensional requirements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-30.
    9. Yu, Haijun & Dai, Hongliang & Tian, Guangdong & Wu, Benben & Xie, Yinghao & Zhu, Ying & Zhang, Tongzhu & Fathollahi-Fard, Amir Mohammad & He, Qi & Tang, Hong, 2021. "Key technology and application analysis of quick coding for recovery of retired energy vehicle battery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Ye, Lixin, 2007. "Indicative bidding and a theory of two-stage auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 181-207, January.
    11. Li, Jizi & Liu, Fangbing & Zhang, Justin Z. & Tong, Zeping, 2023. "Optimal configuration of electric vehicle battery recycling system under across-network cooperation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    12. Xiao, Fei & Wang, Haijun & Guo, Shuojia & Guan, Xu & Liu, Baoshan, 2021. "Efficient and truthful multi-attribute auctions for crowdsourced delivery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Wang, Yufei & Liao, Zhongju, 2023. "Functional industrial policy mechanism under natural resource conflict: A case study on the Chinese new energy vehicle industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. James Morton Turner & Leah M. Nugent, 2016. "Charging up Battery Recycling Policies: Extended Producer Responsibility for Single-Use Batteries in the European Union, Canada, and the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(5), pages 1148-1158, October.
    15. Katzman, Brett, 1999. "A Two Stage Sequential Auction with Multi-Unit Demands," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 77-99, May.
    16. Wang, Lei & Wang, Xiang & Yang, Wenxian, 2020. "Optimal design of electric vehicle battery recycling network – From the perspective of electric vehicle manufacturers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    17. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    18. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Zhang, Huiming & Zhu, Kexin & Hang, Zixuan & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Yi & Xu, Zhidong, 2022. "Waste battery-to-reutilization decisions under government subsidies: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guohao Li & Tao Wang, 2022. "Long-Term Leases vs. One-Off Purchases: Game Analysis on Battery Swapping Mode Considering Cascade Utilization and Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Yongyou Nie & Yuhan Wang & Lu Li & Haolan Liao, 2023. "Literature Review on Power Battery Echelon Reuse and Recycling from a Circular Economy Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Menglin Zhan & Yan Chen, 2022. "Vehicle Company’s Decision-Making to Process Waste Batteries: A Game Research under the Influence of Different Government Subsidy Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Li, Jingjing & Wang, Zhaoxin & Li, Hui & Jiao, Jianling, 2024. "Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    5. Liu, Chang-Yi & Wang, Hui & Tang, Juan & Chang, Ching-Ter & Liu, Zhi, 2021. "Optimal recovery model in a used batteries closed-loop supply chain considering uncertain residual capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Debnath, Ramit & Bardhan, Ronita & Reiner, David M. & Miller, J.R., 2021. "Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental dimensions of electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A social-media interaction analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Zhang, Qi & Tang, Yanyan & Bunn, Derek & Li, Hailong & Li, Yaoming, 2021. "Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    8. Peng Xing & Junzhu Yao, 2022. "Power Battery Echelon Utilization and Recycling Strategy for New Energy Vehicles Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Claudiu Vasile Kifor & Niculina Alexandra Grigore, 2023. "Circular Economy Approaches for Electrical and Conventional Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Zhu, Lijing & Wang, Jingzhou & Farnoosh, Arash & Pan, Xunzhang, 2022. "A game-theory analysis of electric vehicle adoption in Beijing under license plate control policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    11. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Boyu & Li, Yan & Ni, Ruiyan & Wang, Yi, 2023. "What influences residents’ intention to participate in the electric vehicle battery recycling? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Li, Jizi & Liu, Fangbing & Zhang, Justin Z. & Tong, Zeping, 2023. "Optimal configuration of electric vehicle battery recycling system under across-network cooperation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    13. Zhenfang Zhang & Min Guo & Wei Yang, 2022. "Analysis of NEV Power Battery Recycling under Different Government Reward-Penalty Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Ari Hyytinen & Sofia Lundberg & Otto Toivanen, 2018. "Design of public procurement auctions: evidence from cleaning contracts," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 49(2), pages 398-426, June.
    15. Zhiqiang Fan & Yifan Luo & Ningning Liang & Shanshan Li, 2023. "A Novel Sustainable Reverse Logistics Network Design for Electric Vehicle Batteries Considering Multi-Kind and Multi-Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Xia, Xiaoning & Li, Pengwei & Cheng, Yang, 2024. "Economic and environmental evaluation of different collection models for spent power batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    17. Zhang, Huiming & Zhu, Kexin & Hang, Zixuan & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Yi & Xu, Zhidong, 2022. "Waste battery-to-reutilization decisions under government subsidies: An evolutionary game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2019. "A Structured Literature Review on Obsolete Electric Vehicles Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Hao Hao & Wenxian Xu & Fangfang Wei & Chuanliang Wu & Zhaoran Xu, 2022. "Reward–Penalty vs. Deposit–Refund: Government Incentive Mechanisms for EV Battery Recycling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.