IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v166y2022ics1366554522002629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daily load planning under different autonomous truck deployment scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Al Hajj Hassan, Lama
  • Hewitt, Mike
  • Mahmassani, Hani S.

Abstract

This paper presents and tests modified service network design formulations that account for five levels of truck automation in a daily load planning setting. Given daily updates of load information, the paths for the five deployment scenarios are adjusted using two daily updating strategies. Both strategies start with a base plan in which paths are generated based on the historic daily distribution of load dispatches during an average week. The two strategies are: (1) Option 1: re-optimization of pre-booked loads and new requests, and (2) Option 2: optimization of new requests only. The solutions of the two strategies are compared to the hindsight plan which assumes complete information of actual requests placed. The presented formulations are tested out on an industry partner’s network. Results show that the savings achieved with re-optimization (Option 1) compared to insertion (Option 2) increase with more demand variability; this outcome is consistent across all fleet mixes. When most of the loads are new arrivals, the computational time of the two approaches is comparable and insertion is less attractive than re-optimization. With daily re-optimization, most of the plan changes adjust the terminals visited by a load compared to just changing the dispatch and arrival times along the load’s path.

Suggested Citation

  • Al Hajj Hassan, Lama & Hewitt, Mike & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2022. "Daily load planning under different autonomous truck deployment scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:166:y:2022:i:c:s1366554522002629
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554522002629
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Erera & Michael Hewitt & Martin Savelsbergh & Yang Zhang, 2013. "Improved Load Plan Design Through Integer Programming Based Local Search," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 412-427, August.
    2. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 1998. "Acceptance and Dispatching Policies for a Distribution Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 127-141, May.
    3. Dall'Orto, Leonardo Campo & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Leal, Jose Eugenio & Powell, Warren B., 2006. "The single-node dynamic service scheduling and dispatching problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Barcos, L. & Rodríguez, V. & Álvarez, M.J. & Robusté, F., 2010. "Routing design for less-than-truckload motor carriers using Ant Colony Optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 367-383, May.
    5. Barrett W. Thomas & Chelsea C. White, 2004. "Anticipatory Route Selection," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 473-487, November.
    6. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Jacques Roy, 1992. "Design of Regular Intercity Driver Routes for the LTL Motor Carrier Industry," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 280-295, November.
    7. Mitrovic-Minic, Snezana & Krishnamurti, Ramesh & Laporte, Gilbert, 2004. "Double-horizon based heuristics for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 669-685, September.
    8. Mitrovic-Minic, Snezana & Laporte, Gilbert, 2004. "Waiting strategies for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 635-655, August.
    9. Jardar Andersen & Marielle Christiansen & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Roar Grønhaug, 2011. "Branch and Price for Service Network Design with Asset Management Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 33-49, February.
    10. Jin Y. Yen, 1971. "Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(11), pages 712-716, July.
    11. Jürgen Branke & Martin Middendorf & Guntram Noeth & Maged Dessouky, 2005. "Waiting Strategies for Dynamic Vehicle Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 298-312, August.
    12. Raymond K. Cheung & B. Muralidharan, 2000. "Dynamic Routing for Priority Shipments in LTL Service Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 86-98, February.
    13. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Mike Hewitt & Michel Toulouse & Duc Minh Vu, 2016. "Service Network Design with Resource Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 1380-1393, November.
    14. Jian Yang & Patrick Jaillet & Hani Mahmassani, 2004. "Real-Time Multivehicle Truckload Pickup and Delivery Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 135-148, May.
    15. Kathleen Lindsey & Alan Erera & Martin Savelsbergh, 2016. "Improved Integer Programming-Based Neighborhood Search for Less-Than-Truckload Load Plan Design," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 1360-1379, November.
    16. Berbeglia, Gerardo & Cordeau, Jean-François & Laporte, Gilbert, 2010. "Dynamic pickup and delivery problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 8-15, April.
    17. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel, 2000. "Service network design in freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 272-288, April.
    18. Nabila Azi & Michel Gendreau & Jean-Yves Potvin, 2012. "A dynamic vehicle routing problem with multiple delivery routes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 103-112, October.
    19. Scherr, Yannick Oskar & Neumann Saavedra, Bruno Albert & Hewitt, Mike & Mattfeld, Dirk Christian, 2019. "Service network design with mixed autonomous fleets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 40-55.
    20. Ahmad I. Jarrah & Ellis Johnson & Lucas C. Neubert, 2009. "Large-Scale, Less-than-Truckload Service Network Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 609-625, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiwei Wu & Hongyu Zhang & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen, 2023. "Mathematical Optimization of Carbon Storage and Transport Problem for Carbon Capture, Use, and Storage Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jian & Woensel, Tom Van, 2023. "Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Greening, Lacy M. & Dahan, Mathieu & Erera, Alan L., 2023. "Lead-Time-Constrained Middle-Mile Consolidation Network Design with Fixed Origins and Destinations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Pillac, Victor & Gendreau, Michel & Guéret, Christelle & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2013. "A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 1-11.
    4. Miguel Andres Figliozzi & Hani S. Mahmassani & Patrick Jaillet, 2007. "Pricing in Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 302-318, August.
    5. Hewitt, Mike & Lehuédé, Fabien, 2023. "New formulations for the Scheduled Service Network Design Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 117-133.
    6. Cheung, Bernard K.-S. & Choy, K.L. & Li, Chung-Lun & Shi, Wenzhong & Tang, Jian, 2008. "Dynamic routing model and solution methods for fleet management with mobile technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 694-705, June.
    7. Eskandarzadeh, Saman & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2024. "Containerised parcel delivery: Modelling and performance evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Herszterg, Ian & Ridouane, Yassine & Boland, Natashia & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2022. "Near real-time loadplan adjustments for less-than-truckload carriers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1021-1034.
    9. Natashia Boland & Mike Hewitt & Luke Marshall & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "The Continuous-Time Service Network Design Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1303-1321, October.
    10. Soeffker, Ninja & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Mattfeld, Dirk C., 2022. "Stochastic dynamic vehicle routing in the light of prescriptive analytics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 801-820.
    11. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Mike Hewitt & Michel Toulouse & Duc Minh Vu, 2018. "Scheduled service network design with resource acquisition and management," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 277-309, September.
    12. Diego Muñoz-Carpintero & Doris Sáez & Cristián E. Cortés & Alfredo Núñez, 2015. "A Methodology Based on Evolutionary Algorithms to Solve a Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problem Under a Hybrid Predictive Control Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 239-253, May.
    13. Marlin W. Ulmer & Barrett W. Thomas & Dirk C. Mattfeld, 2019. "Preemptive depot returns for dynamic same-day delivery," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(4), pages 327-361, December.
    14. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    15. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2014. "The benefit of advance load information for truckload carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 34-54.
    16. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    17. Barrett W. Thomas, 2007. "Waiting Strategies for Anticipating Service Requests from Known Customer Locations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 319-331, August.
    18. Diego Cattaruzza & Nabil Absi & Dominique Feillet & Jesús González-Feliu, 2017. "Vehicle routing problems for city logistics," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 51-79, March.
    19. Lars M. Hvattum & Arne Løkketangen & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "Solving a Dynamic and Stochastic Vehicle Routing Problem with a Sample Scenario Hedging Heuristic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 421-438, November.
    20. Srour, F.J. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Oppen, J., 2014. "Strategies for Handling Temporal Uncertainty in Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:166:y:2022:i:c:s1366554522002629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.