IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v106y2017icp1-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highway traffic state estimation per lane in the presence of connected vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Bekiaris-Liberis, Nikolaos
  • Roncoli, Claudio
  • Papageorgiou, Markos

Abstract

A model-based traffic state estimation approach is developed for per-lane density estimation as well as on-ramp and off-ramp flows estimation for highways in presence of connected vehicles. Three are the basic ingredients of the developed estimation scheme: (1) a data-driven version of the conservation-of-vehicles equation (in its time- and space-discretized form); (2) the utilization of position and speed information from connected vehicles’ reports, as well as total flow measurements obtained from a minimum number (sufficient for the observability of the model) of fixed detectors, such as, for example, at the main entry and exit of a given highway stretch; and (3) the employment of a standard Kalman filter. Furthermore, necessary and sufficient conditions for the (strong) structural observability of the introduced model are established (properties, which are rarely studied in the literature on traffic estimation), which yield the fixed detectors requirements needed for the proper operation of the developed estimation scheme. The performance of the estimation scheme is evaluated for various penetration rates of connected vehicles utilizing real microscopic traffic data collected within the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program. It is shown that the estimation performance is satisfactory, in terms of a suitable metric, even for low penetration rates of connected vehicles. The sensitivity of the estimation performance to variations of the model parameters (two in total) is also quantified, and it is shown that, overall, the estimation scheme is little sensitive to the model parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Bekiaris-Liberis, Nikolaos & Roncoli, Claudio & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2017. "Highway traffic state estimation per lane in the presence of connected vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:1-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261517302114
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coifman, Benjamin, 2003. "Estimating density and lane inflow on a freeway segment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 689-701, October.
    2. Duret, Aurélien & Yuan, Yufei, 2017. "Traffic state estimation based on Eulerian and Lagrangian observations in a mesoscopic modeling framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 51-71.
    3. Charles H. Knapp, 1973. "Traffic Density Estimation for Single and Multilane Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 75-84, February.
    4. Sun, Zhe & Jin, Wen-Long & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2017. "Simultaneous estimation of states and parameters in Newell’s simplified kinematic wave model with Eulerian and Lagrangian traffic data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 106-122.
    5. Herrera, Juan C. & Bayen, Alexandre M., 2010. "Incorporation of Lagrangian measurements in freeway traffic state estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 460-481, May.
    6. Yang-Yu Liu & Jean-Jacques Slotine & Albert-László Barabási, 2011. "Controllability of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7346), pages 167-173, May.
    7. Man-Feng Chang & Dunos C. Gazis, 1975. "Traffic Density Estimation with Consideration of Lane-Changing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 308-320, November.
    8. Laval, Jorge A. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "Lane-changing in traffic streams," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 251-264, March.
    9. Deng, Wen & Lei, Hao & Zhou, Xuesong, 2013. "Traffic state estimation and uncertainty quantification based on heterogeneous data sources: A three detector approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 132-157.
    10. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 1999. "A stochastic modeling approach to dynamic prediction of section-wide inter-lane and intra-lane traffic variables using point detector data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 79-100, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rinaldi, Marco, 2018. "Controllability of transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 381-406.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seo, Toru & Kawasaki, Yutaka & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Fundamental diagram estimation by using trajectories of probe vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 40-56.
    2. Coifman, Benjamin A. & Mallika, Ramachandran, 2007. "Distributed surveillance on freeways emphasizing incident detection and verification," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 750-767, October.
    3. Jin, Wen-Long, 2010. "A kinematic wave theory of lane-changing traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1001-1021, September.
    4. Zheng, Zuduo & Su, Dongcai, 2016. "Traffic state estimation through compressed sensing and Markov random field," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 525-554.
    5. Ma, Tao & Zhou, Zhou & Abdulhai, Baher, 2015. "Nonlinear multivariate time–space threshold vector error correction model for short term traffic state prediction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 27-47.
    6. Duret, Aurélien & Yuan, Yufei, 2017. "Traffic state estimation based on Eulerian and Lagrangian observations in a mesoscopic modeling framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 51-71.
    7. Coifman, Benjamin & Varaiya, Pravin, 2002. "Deployment and Evaluation of Real-Time Vehicle Reidentification from an Operations Perspective," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6tp5w2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Coifman, Benjamin, 2003. "Estimating density and lane inflow on a freeway segment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 689-701, October.
    9. Nantes, Alfredo & Ngoduy, Dong & Miska, Marc & Chung, Edward, 2015. "Probabilistic travel time progression and its application to automatic vehicle identification data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 131-145.
    10. Blake Davis & Ang Ji & Bichen Liu & David Levinson, 2020. "Moving Array Traffic Probes," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    11. Xing, Tao & Zhou, Xuesong & Taylor, Jeffrey, 2013. "Designing heterogeneous sensor networks for estimating and predicting path travel time dynamics: An information-theoretic modeling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 66-90.
    12. Wei, Bo & Liu, Jie & Wei, Daijun & Gao, Cai & Deng, Yong, 2015. "Weighted k-shell decomposition for complex networks based on potential edge weights," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 277-283.
    13. Bai, Lu & Wong, S.C. & Xu, Pengpeng & Chow, Andy H.F. & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Calibration of stochastic link-based fundamental diagram with explicit consideration of speed heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 524-539.
    14. Andreas Koulouris & Ioannis Katerelos & Theodore Tsekeris, 2013. "Multi-Equilibria Regulation Agent-Based Model of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 51-70.
    15. He, He & Yang, Bo & Hu, Xiaoming, 2016. "Exploring community structure in networks by consensus dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 342-353.
    16. Laval, Jorge A. & Toth, Christopher S. & Zhou, Yi, 2014. "A parsimonious model for the formation of oscillations in car-following models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 228-238.
    17. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    18. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    19. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    20. Bo Zhang & Jianping Yuan & J. F. Pan & Xiaoyu Wu & Jianjun Luo & Li Qiu, 2017. "Global Feedback Control for Coordinated Linear Switched Reluctance Machines Network with Full-State Observation and Internal Model Compensation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:1-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.