IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v150y2021icp74-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling individual preferences of goods receivers for a Receiver-led delivery consolidation service

Author

Listed:
  • Aljohani, Khalid
  • Thompson, Russell G.

Abstract

There have been various initiatives to consolidate freight deliveries. Researchers have been primarily concerned with assessing the impact upon freight carriers. This study addresses a subject that has received limited attention: Receiver-led delivery consolidation (RLC) policy. The study aims to characterise freight receivers’ preferences for a RLC service and delve more deeply into the most preferred RLC policy variables that could induce receivers’ propensity towards choosing a RLC service. This study estimates behavioural responses of businesses in Melbourne’s CBD, Australia using a mixed logit model a latent-class logit mode with respect to receivers’ preferences for the RLC service as well as quantifying the willingness to pay (WTP) for a RLC delivery service. The modelling results show that the time-window of consolidated delivery and availability of relevant value-added services significantly influence receivers’ preferences. The study findings reveal high preferences for versions of a RLC service that maintain current delivery practices. The results of the WTP calculation suggest that while there might be a net benefit for receivers to pay for services, delivery characteristics of receivers, such as their sub-industry type, highly influence WTP. Future freight consolidation should be optimised by sub-industry and should accommodate as closely as possible the current delivery practices that businesses use. Accordingly, this study proposes suitable configurations of a RLC service based on the individual-level preferences of the most willing sub-industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2021. "Modelling individual preferences of goods receivers for a Receiver-led delivery consolidation service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 74-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:150:y:2021:i:c:p:74-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856421001439
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    2. Hausman, Jerry & McFadden, Daniel, 1984. "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(5), pages 1219-1240, September.
    3. Edoardo Marcucci & Romeo Danielis, 2008. "The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 269-284, March.
    4. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    5. Daly, Andrew & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2012. "Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modelling estimates," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 333-341.
    6. Holguín-Veras, José & Amaya Leal, Johanna & Seruya, Barbara B., 2017. "Urban freight policymaking: The role of qualitative and quantitative research," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 75-85.
    7. Khalid Aljohani & Russell G. Thompson, 2020. "An Examination of Last Mile Delivery Practices of Freight Carriers Servicing Business Receivers in Inner-City Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Arne Risa Hole, 2007. "Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(3), pages 388-401, September.
    9. Laetitia Dablanc, 2011. "City Distribution, a Key Element of the Urban Economy: Guidelines for Practitioners," Chapters, in: Cathy Macharis & Sandra Melo (ed.), City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    11. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Scaccia, Luisa, 2015. "Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 239-249.
    12. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2020. "Receivers-led delivery consolidation policy: Estimating the characteristics of the most interested businesses to participate," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2017. "Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rome: Retailers’ perceptions and stated reactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 142-156.
    14. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo & Delle Site, Paolo & Le Pira, Michela & Carrocci, Céline Sacha, 2019. "Planning with stakeholders: Analysing alternative off-hour delivery solutions via an interactive multi-criteria approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-62.
    15. Björklund, Maria & Abrahamsson, Mats & Johansson, Henrik, 2017. "Critical factors for viable business models for urban consolidation centres," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 36-47.
    16. Danielis, Romeo & Rotaris, Lucia & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2010. "Urban freight policies and distribution channels: a discussion based on evidence from Italian cities," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 46, pages 114-146.
    17. Mauricio Sillano & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2005. "Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Mixed Logit Models: Some New Evidence," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(3), pages 525-550, March.
    18. Amanda Stathopoulos & Eva Valeri & Edoardo Marcucci & Edourdo Marcucci & Valerio Gatti & Agostino Nuzzolo, 2011. "Urban Freight Policy Innovation for Rome’s LTZ: A Stakeholder Perspective," Chapters, in: Cathy Macharis & Sandra Melo (ed.), City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. dell’Olio, Luigi & Moura, Jose Luis & Ibeas, Angel & Cordera, Ruben & Holguin-Veras, Jose, 2017. "Receivers’ willingness-to-adopt novel urban goods distribution practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 130-141.
    20. Kenneth E. McConnell, 1977. "Congestion and Willingness to Pay: A Study of Beach Use," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(2), pages 185-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akgün, Emine Zehra & Monios, Jason & Cowie, Jonathan & Fonzone, Achille, 2024. "The retailer perspective on the potential for using urban consolidation centres (UCCs)," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.
    3. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2021. "Profitability of freight consolidation facilities: A detailed cost analysis based on theoretical modelling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Carla de Oliveira Leite Nascimento & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Paulo Tarso Vilela de Resende & Francisco Gildemir Ferreira da Silva, 2019. "Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2020. "Receivers-led delivery consolidation policy: Estimating the characteristics of the most interested businesses to participate," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Isa, Selma Setsumi & Lima, Orlando Fontes & Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo, 2021. "Urban consolidation centers: Impact analysis by stakeholder," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Marcucci, Edoardo & Le Pira, Michela & Gatta, Valerio & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo & Pluchino, Alessandro, 2017. "Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 69-86.
    8. Scaccia, Luisa & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2023. "Prediction and confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for mixed logit models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 54-78.
    9. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2023. "Social Responsibility and Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport Markets," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 829-850, July.
    10. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Le Pira, Michela, 2018. "Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 119-132.
    11. Kalkbrenner, Bernhard J. & Yonezawa, Koichi & Roosen, Jutta, 2017. "Consumer preferences for electricity tariffs: Does proximity matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 413-424.
    12. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    13. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2020. "A multi-criteria spatial evaluation framework to optimise the siting of freight consolidation facilities in inner-city areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 51-69.
    14. Helen Scarborough & Jeff Bennett, 2012. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14376.
    15. de Carvalho, Nayara Louise Alves & Ribeiro, Priscilla Cristina Cabral & García-Martos, Carolina & Fernández, Camino González & Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal, 2019. "Urban distribution centres in historical cities from the perspective of residents, retailers and carriers," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Comi, Antonio, 2020. "A modelling framework to forecast urban goods flows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Lu, Jiajun, 2020. "Household residential location choice in retirement: The role of climate amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Daniela, Paddeu, 2021. "The Five Attribute Performance Assessment (FAPA) model to evaluate the performance of an urban consolidation centre," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joelle Morana & Josep-Maria Salanova Grau & Tai-Yu Ma, 2013. "Design And Scenario Assessment For Collaborative Logistics And Freight Transport Systems," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 40(2).
    20. Priscila Pereira Suzart Carvalho & Ricardo Araújo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez & Sandro Breval Santiago, 2019. "Interactions among stakeholders in the processes of city logistics: a systematic review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 567-607, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:150:y:2021:i:c:p:74-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.